Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Graphics Performance

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Graphics Performance E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Olin Coles   
Thursday, 22 March 2012
Table of Contents: Page Index
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Graphics Performance
First Look: GeForce GTX 680
NVIDIA Kepler GPU Details
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX10: Crysis Warhead
DX11: 3DMark11
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Batman Arkham City
DX11: Battlefield 3
DX11: Gugila GroundWiz RTS
DX11: Lost Planet 2
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Unigine Heaven 3.0
Temperature and Power Consumption
GeForce GTX 680 Conclusion

DX11: Metro 2033

Metro 2033 is an action-oriented video game with a combination of survival horror, and first-person shooter elements. The game is based on the novel Metro 2033 by Russian author Dmitry Glukhovsky. It was developed by 4A Games in Ukraine and released in March 2010 for Microsoft Windows. Metro 2033 uses the 4A game engine, developed by 4A Games. The 4A Engine supports DirectX-9, 10, and 11, along with NVIDIA PhysX and GeForce 3D Vision.

The 4A engine is multi-threaded in such that only PhysX had a dedicated thread, and uses a task-model without any pre-conditioning or pre/post-synchronizing, allowing tasks to be done in parallel. The 4A game engine can utilize a deferred shading pipeline, and uses tessellation for greater performance, and also has HDR (complete with blue shift), real-time reflections, color correction, film grain and noise, and the engine also supports multi-core rendering.

Metro 2033 featured superior volumetric fog, double PhysX precision, object blur, sub-surface scattering for skin shaders, parallax mapping on all surfaces and greater geometric detail with a less aggressive LODs. Using PhysX, the engine uses many features such as destructible environments, and cloth and water simulations, and particles that can be fully affected by environmental factors.

NVIDIA has been diligently working to promote Metro 2033, and for good reason: it's one of the most demanding PC video games we've ever tested. When their flagship GeForce GTX 480 struggles to produce 27 FPS with DirectX-11 anti-aliasing turned two to its lowest setting, you know that only the strongest graphics processors will generate playable frame rates. All of our tests enable Advanced Depth of Field and Tessellation effects, but disable advanced PhysX options.

  • Metro 2033 Benchmark
    • Settings: Very-High Quality, 4x AA, 16x AF, Tessellation, PhysX Disabled


Metro 2033 Benchmark Test Results

Graphics Card GeForce GTX570 Radeon HD6970 GeForce GTX580 Radeon HD7970 GeForce GTX680 Radeon HD6990 GeForce GTX590
GPU Cores 480 1536 512 2048 1536 3072 Total 1024
Core Clock (MHz) 732 880 772 925 1006 (1187 OC) 830/880 608
Shader Clock (MHz) 1464 N/A 1544 N/A Boost 1058 (1240 OC) N/A 1215
Memory Clock (MHz) 950 1375 1002 1375 1502 (1600 OC) 1250 854
Memory Amount 1280MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 1536MB GDDR5 3072MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 4096MB GDDR5 3072
Memory Interface 320-bit 256-bit 384-bit 384-bit 256-bit 256-bit 384-bit



# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card Performancedanwat1234 2012-03-22 07:43
I hope all of you buying these high end GPUs put them to good use when your not gaming! [email protected] or another distributed computing project, do your part to help science!
Peace out
Report Comment
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card Performancebob 2012-03-23 02:05
I hope you are joking. These gpu are bad for gpgpu like boinc. 7970 are great!
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card PerformanceOlin Coles 2012-03-23 08:37
Based on what factual evidence? I notice the 7970 couldn't even run a DirectX 11 tessellation test, so how will it compete with GPGPU tests?
Report Comment
# On what Evidence! Are You Blind, Deaf, Stupid & Insane?tophat killer 2012-03-27 09:55
REady any, and I mean any direct compute review of kepler and tahati,
tahati beats gk104 by 10 to over 500%. Nv castrated direct computer in gk104.
Report Comment
# Is there going to be a difference?Christopher Fields 2012-03-22 08:04
I have 2 GTX 580's in SLI and they are water cooled. After months of rumors you guys have seemed to clear things up. I read things like "3 Times more powerful than a GTX 580 OC" to "The Card will be 8-9" Long".

I guess my question is this. My monitor is a 60Hz LED 32" 1920x1080 with a 5ms refresh rate. I play Battlefield 3 100% of the time. If I buy this card will my experience be any different?

I can prob answer this one Nvidia makes great products and the nice thing is when you buy a top end card you can usually skip a generation and wait for the next knock out contender. I would say if you have a GTX480 Series to upgrade. But if you have a Single GTX580 then put on the brakes and wait for the next show.

This of course is just my opinion. This is a great article, I always like reading your stuff Olin. Thanks for the time & effort you guys put into these reviews.
Report Comment
# RE: Is there going to be a difference?Olin Coles 2012-03-22 08:27
As a BF3 player myself (Das Capitolin), I can say that you're not going to SEE a significant difference between an overclocked GTX 580 and the new GTX 680. That being said, Active vSync is something worth considering, as are the extremely low sound levels and heat output. Since you've already purchased the 580's, I see no solid reason to upgrade. But if someone's deciding between the two, the GTX 680 easily wins my vote.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: Is there going to be a difference?Christopher Fields 2012-03-22 08:49
I added you Olin, S1W3A3T7
Report Comment
# Very good POWReSeRe 2012-03-22 12:35
i'm talking about skiping 1 generation GPU (and usually CPU too). Yes that's my philosophy either.
now i'm BF3in' w/ 460 1Gb SLI on an (pretty old but excellent LCD) EIZO 1600/1200. high settings (not ultra). Actually i could go ultra BUT with a drastic tweak down AA and other 1, maybe 2 settings.
In BF3 my nick: mantuitoru.

Once again, good review.
Long live the competition, anyway. in this case nVidia vs AMD.
Report Comment
# gk110godrilla 2012-03-22 08:43
I'm going to wait for gk110 chip according to fudzilla will be out by July , currently using classified gtx 580 ultra.
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card Performanceroy 2012-03-22 10:04
Good card and excellent review! I love the low power usage and the new tech(txaa,adaptive v-sync,28nm,gpu boost,etc). A little concerned by the 256mb memory bus.
I wanna upgrade but until Nvidia (must have Phys-x) releases a single gpu card that can run Metro 2033 at max settings (4xAA,16xAF,very high quality,advanced DOF on and phys-x on) and average 60fps at 1920x1200 I guess I am stuck with my GTX480 sli for a long while.
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card Performanceclaydough 2012-03-22 13:34
at 3x the cuda cores than the card that was supposed to replace the 560ti that was supposed to be released first the benchmarks do not even seem to reflect the numbers of that affordable version? :(

Rumors however that this is the card was supposed to replace the 560ti but the performance was so good that they just gave it the 680 designation is very unsettling...

What happened to the consumer friendly mid powered card that was supposed to be released first?

What the heck happened to the Kepler super powered card?

Better than 480 to 580 but is this just another incremental release or hardware without drivers?

Or worse yet...
Did we just get version screwed?
Report Comment
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card PerformanceOlin Coles 2012-03-22 16:16
I don't recall NVIDIA ever making a statement on Kepler, it's roadmap, or what it was intended to replace. In other words, consider the source.
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card Performanceclaydough 2012-03-22 13:50
Maybe the rumors of gtx 780 were true?
If this is the replacement for the gtx 560ti..
and the gtx780 is coming out at the end of this year...
Then that would be fine with me!
If the following gtx 780 benchmarks are real:

Like I said in next gen console/xbox 720 article:
Anything without the benefit of present day maxwell development is sure to lead to a another very console limiting 10 year cycle!
Report Comment
# This..luay 2012-03-23 10:26
AMD replaced their mid-end product names with the higher end when they released their 6000 series, so not a first or even second time it has been done. This is a 560ti replacement and it will be marketed to death as a high-end product now and mid-end after July with a price reduction when the 580 replacement comes around.
If this card sells well, console makers should take note and try to cut a deal with Nvidia instead of AMD. I think this is why MS and Sony were not publicizing any future commitments of delivering next-gen consoles..
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Kepler Video Card PerformanceDoug Dallam 2012-03-22 14:40
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Reference Design

Load: 243 W


Also consider, extrapolating from your price comparison of other nVidia top end offerings, the GTX295 also came in at 500+ USD. That's pretty incredible.
Report Comment
# awesomecube 2012-03-22 19:50
If i buy this card, it means i will have to buy a new motherboard, LG2011 which means ill have to buy a new CPU and of course, the newest RAM. so all in all, the only thing i get to keep is my SSD and HDD. At the same time, i will also get a bran new case. so... the games i currently play and will play in the future dont require this much power.

this is what happens when devs dumb down the #ing games for consoles. people like me that used to upgrade every other cycle are now holding off and keeping their system alot longer. Means less PC part sales. =/ hope # will get better for us.
Report Comment
# RE: awesomeDavid Ramsey 2012-03-22 19:54
You don't have to buy an LGA2011 motherboard to use this will work fine in any PCI-E x16 slot in older motherboards.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: awesomecube 2012-03-22 19:58
but they must have PCI Express 3.0 right?
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: awesomeOlin Coles 2012-03-22 20:02
Just like PCI-E 2.0 is backward compatible with PCI-E 16x, PCI-E 3.0 is backwards to 2.0 and 16x as well.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: awesomecube 2012-03-22 20:03
yeah, but what about later on when games do take advantage of 3.0, if ever... then ill have to buy a new mobo for that.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: awesomeDavid Ramsey 2012-03-22 20:08
That's a long way off in the future. Current games don't come anywhere near to saturating a PCI-E 2.0 x16 slot.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: awesomecube 2012-03-22 20:34
can you please go to the forums under hardware. I posted a question and need some help.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: awesomeclaydough 2012-03-26 13:30
I like to emphasize the only factor keeping any hardware pipe from melting away from saturation is compromise and economics. The artist and imagination exists today for any game that is possible with tech at the end of the 21rst century. Creativity is both cpu and gpu limited!

The game that is possible in your lifetime is only limited by the rate of hardware acceptance. ( keep buying till cinematic levels of hyper real realtime rendering is possible... after that wait until holograms become a reasonable reality? )
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: awesomeChristopher Fields 2012-03-26 13:35
WTF? Holograms?..................I think we are a way off from gaming on holograms, lol, 3D Gaming has just barely been breaking the surface their Spock, lol. But it would be cool. PS beware of SUPER NERDS!!!!
Report Comment
# MrSteven 2012-03-24 14:50
I find it hard to believe that this is the replacement for the GTX 560ti when it costs 430. Ouch! Budget card my ass!
Report Comment
# Bought 2: Selling Bothkzinti1 2012-03-27 23:02
I realized that this is merely a replacement for mid-range cards.
Even though it beats the best of the 5xx series, it's still only a mid-range card.
The REAL high performers will be out in a couple of months.
Nvidia's hype-machine got me once again.
I should know better by now.
Report Comment
# AdamAdam 2012-04-01 16:03
I have one of these on order. Had 2 GTX 480 in SLi. This one card should easily beat them. My GTX 480 ran under water @ 900/1800/1848. They would out bench a stock 580 as they were the same GPU. Just tweaked a little.

This is a whole NEW GPU. Like Fermi was. The 670 has already been annouced and waterblock manufactors are shipping the bocks. Expect theor next release to be a lower version. Also Laptops are shipping with mobile versions. Check nVidia's homepage.

The next release will be the 780. Time range anything from 6 - 12 months. AMD could influence this.

I have my waterblock on order. I will also be SLi'ing them from about 2 months in.
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Video Card Performancestelios 2012-05-14 21:56
i did a test to see where im at with those settings and i got 46.7fps gtx580 @962Mhz compared to 39 is a 20% increase in performance and gtx 680 is 56fps compared to a stock gtx 580 is 41%increase in performance but compared to gtx 580 oc in my case 22-23% performance increase pretty good if u ask me
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Graphics Performanceramin 2012-11-11 07:42
NVIDIA?s newest flagship card(680) is superior to the HD 7970 in almost every way. Whether it is performance, power consumption, noise, features, price or launch day availability, it currently owns the road and won?t be looking over its shoulder for some time to come.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Graphics PerformanceDavid Ramsey 2012-11-11 09:38
Hm, no, not necessarily. The 7970 is superior in some games (as these benchmarks show), and NVIDIA still can't match the 7970's lower power usage, especially in multi-card setups where Radeons not being used are all but disabled-- sub 5-W power consumption, fan stopped, etc.-- when they're not needed (i.e. if you're not playing a game.)

Still, I'd agree GTX680 performance is better overall, and they still own the world in GPGPU.
Report Comment

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews

Like Benchmark Reviews on FacebookFollow Benchmark Reviews on Twitter