Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Processors arrow AMD Athlon-II X2-260 Regor Processor

AMD Athlon-II X2-260 Regor Processor E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Processors
Written by Hank Tolman   
Monday, 07 June 2010
Table of Contents: Page Index
AMD Athlon-II X2-260 Regor Processor
Features and Specifications
Closer Look: Athlon-II X2-260
Testing and Results
EVEREST Benchmark Tests
Passmark PerformanceTest
PCMark Vantage Benchmark Tests
SiSoftware Sandra
Cinebench R11.5 Benchmarks
Video Game Benchmarks
AMD Athlon-II X2 Final Thoughts
AMD Regor CPU Conclusion

Passmark Performance Test

PassMark PerformanceTest is a PC hardware benchmark utility that allows a user to quickly assess the performance of their computer and compare it to a number of standard 'baseline' computer systems. The Passmark PerformanceTest CPU tests all benchmark the mathematical operations, compression, encryption, SSE, and 3DNow! instructions of modern processors.

In our tests there were several areas of concentration for each benchmark, which are combined into one compound score. This score is referred to as the CPU Mark, and is a composite of the following tests: Integer Math, Floating Point Math, Find Prime Numbers, SSE/3DNow!, Compression, Encryption, Image Rotation, and String Sorting. For this review, we've also decided to run the memory benchmark, which results in a composite score based on the following tests: small block allocation, cached read, uncached read, write performance, and large block allocation.


The Passmark performance tests show a much different result than the Everest tests. It seems that the clock speed influences the test score a lot more than the amount of cores, where the AMD processors are concerned. The Athlon-II X2-260 not only maintains its 3% advantage over the X2-255, but in the Passmark tests, the X2-260 also outperforms the X3-445 at stock speeds. Granted, the performance increase over the X3-445 is less than 1%, and therefore within the margin of error. When overclocked, the faster clockspeed of the X3-445 at 3.9GHz outperforms the 3.6GHz X2-260 by about 9%.


The Memory marks show the same results as the CPU marks. The i7-920 was omitted from the Memory results so that the same test memory could be used in all the platforms. The Athlon-II X2-260 at stock speeds once again outperforms both of the slower clocked processors, the X2-255 and the X3-445, by about 3%. At overclocked speeds, the faster X3-445 takes the lead with its clock speed of 3.9GHz over the 3.6GHz Athlon-II X2-260. The Passmark results give us a good idea of how the X2-260 might perform under programs that only utilize a single core. The bottom line here is that it probably isn't worth the extra $11 to get the triple-core X3-445 if you aren't planning on putting that third core to use.



# NiceVyperN 2010-11-10 20:02
I didnt know if I should or shouldnt get this... I got a Phenom II X4 965 BE ... But I'm gonna get this one for my mother's pc....
Thanks for the review...
Report Comment
# RE: AMD Athlon-II X2-260 Regor Processorlalit panwar 2011-11-18 00:50
amd athlon processor is very cool and quiest processor its working fastly than intel processor, lower price or not expensive yet,improving the pc performance. so i should suggest all friend use the amd processor
Report Comment
# RAMTakisK 2012-08-31 08:04
I will buy this processor soon and i want to know if it handle 1333 mhz ddr3 memory
Report Comment
# RE: RAMOlin Coles 2012-08-31 18:44
That should be fine, although faster memory is limited by the motherboard (not processor).
Report Comment

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews

Like Benchmark Reviews on FacebookFollow Benchmark Reviews on Twitter