Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow Sapphire HD4890 Toxic Vapor-X 11150-01-40R

Sapphire HD4890 Toxic Vapor-X 11150-01-40R E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Olin Coles   
Tuesday, 09 June 2009
Table of Contents: Page Index
Sapphire HD4890 Toxic Vapor-X 11150-01-40R
Radeon HD 4890 Features
RV790 GPU Specifications
HD4890 Toxic Closer Look
Video Card Testing Methodology
3DMark06 Benchmarks
COD 4 Fraps Benchmarks
Crysis Benchmark Results
Devil May Cry 4 Benchmark
Far Cry 2 Benchmark
World in Conflict Benchmarks
Radeon HD 4890 Temperatures
VGA Power Consumption
Radeon 4000 Final Thoughts
HD4890 Toxic Conclusion

World in Conflict Results

The latest version of Massive's proprietary Masstech engine utilizes DX10 technology and features advanced lighting and physics effects, and allows for a full 360 degree range of camera control. Massive's MassTech engine scales down to accommodate a wide range of PC specifications, if you've played a modern PC game within the last two years, you'll be able to play World in Conflict.

World in Conflict's FPS-like control scheme and 360-degree camera make its action-strategy game play accessible to strategy fans and fans of other genres... if you love strategy, you'll love World in Conflict. If you've never played strategy, World in Conflict is the strategy game to try.

World in Conflict offers an in-game benchmark; which records the minimum, average, and maximum frame rates during the test. Very recently another hardware review website made the assertion that these tests are worthless, but we couldn't disagree more. When used to compare video cards which are dependant on the same driver and use the same GPU architecture, the in-game benchmark works very well and comparisons are apples-to-apples.


World in Conflict plays well on most modern graphics cards, as evidenced by the close proximity of frame rate performance between everything from the GeForce 8800 GT to the GTX 285 (which matched the GTX 295). With a balanced demand for CPU and GPU power, World in Conflict just begins to place demands on the graphics processor at the 1920x1280 resolution. I was expecting more results along the same line I've seen so far, and that is pretty much exactly what I got, only in much smaller differences. There were a few interesting turn-arounds though.

The GeForce 8800 GT performed better than the Radeon HD 4850 (not illustrated), and produced 40 FPS at 1920x1200 resolution in WiC. Rather odd, I will admit, but WiC isn't particular to GPU; although it does feature NVIDIA's TWIMTBP slogan. The GTX 260 series has gone neck-and-neck with the HD 4850 for most of our tests, but now it seems to be beating out the Sapphire Radeon HD 4890 Toxic by some miracle of a chance. Even stranger is how the Radeon HD 4890 Toxic matched the Atomic 4870 X2 (not illustrated) and CrossFireX HD4770's. The factory-overclocked ASUS ENGTX285 TOP GeForce GTX 285 tops our chart with an average 63 FPS performance at 1920x1200, which matches the dual-GT200 GeForce GTX 295. This is another game that proves that what you plan on playing might determine what you plan on buying, since some games prefer one manufacturer or GPU over another.

Product Series NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Reference Design NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260216 Reference Design Radeon HD 4890 GDDR5 Video Card ASUS GeForce GTX 285 ENGTX285 TOP Sapphire Radeon HD 4870 102-B50701-10-AT CrossFireX Set NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Reference Design
Stream Processors 112 216 800 240 640 x2 480
Core Clock (MHz) 600 576 850 670 750 x2 576
Shader Clock (MHz) 1457 1242 N/A 1550 N/A 1242
Memory Clock (MHz) 950 999 975 1300 850 x2 999
Memory Amount 512 MB GDDR3 896 MB GDDR3 896 MB GDDR3 1024 MB GDDR3 512MB (x2) GDDR5 1024MB (x2) GDDR3
Memory Interface 256-bit 448-bit 256-bit 512-bit 256-bit 512-bit

In our next section, we discuss electrical power consumption and learn how well (or poorly) each video card will impact your utility bill...


Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews

Like Benchmark Reviews on FacebookFollow Benchmark Reviews on Twitter