Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow ASUS GeForce GTX 660Ti DirectCU-II TOP
ASUS GeForce GTX 660Ti DirectCU-II TOP E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Olin Coles   
Thursday, 16 August 2012
Table of Contents: Page Index
ASUS GeForce GTX 660Ti DirectCU-II TOP
First Look: ASUS GTX 660Ti TOP
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX10: Crysis Warhead
DX11: 3DMark11
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Batman Arkham City
DX11: Battlefield 3
DX11: Lost Planet 2
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Unigine Heaven 3.0
Temperature and Power Consumption
ASUS GPU Tweak Overclocking
ASUS GTX 660Ti TOP Conclusion

DX10: Crysis Warhead

Crysis Warhead is an expansion pack based on the original Crysis video game. Crysis Warhead is based in the future, where an ancient alien spacecraft has been discovered beneath the Earth on an island east of the Philippines. Crysis Warhead uses a refined version of the CryENGINE2 graphics engine. Like Crysis, Warhead uses the Microsoft Direct3D 10 (DirectX-10) API for graphics rendering.

Benchmark Reviews uses the HOC Crysis Warhead benchmark tool to test and measure graphic performance using the Airfield 1 demo scene. This short test places a high amount of stress on a graphics card because of detailed terrain and textures, but also for the test settings used. Using the DirectX-10 test with Very High Quality settings, the Airfield 1 demo scene receives 4x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering to create maximum graphic load and separate the products according to their performance.

Using the highest quality DirectX-10 settings with 4x AA and 16x AF, only the most powerful graphics cards are expected to perform well in our Crysis Warhead benchmark tests. DirectX-11 extensions are not supported in Crysis: Warhead, and SSAO is not an available option.

  • Crysis Warhead v1.1 with HOC Benchmark
    • Settings: Airfield Demo, Very High Quality, 4x AA, 16x AF

Crysis_Warhead_Benchmark.jpg

Crysis Warhead Benchmark Test Results

Graphics Card GeForce GTX570 Radeon HD6970 GeForce GTX580 GeForce GTX660Ti Radeon HD7970 GeForce GTX670 GeForce GTX680
GPU Cores 480 1536 512 1344 2048 1344 1536
Core Clock (MHz) 732 880 772 915 925 915 1006
Shader Clock (MHz) 1464 N/A 1544 980 Boost N/A 980 Boost 1058 Boost
Memory Clock (MHz) 950 1375 1002 1502 1375 1502 1502
Memory Amount 1280MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 1536MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 3072MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5
Memory Interface 320-bit 256-bit 384-bit 192-bit 384-bit 256-bit 256-bit



 

Comments 

 
# Good valueRealNeil 2012-08-16 07:25
These things are gonna drive market prices down. With such stellar performance from these GTX660Ti cards, AMD will have to do something.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Good valuehcforde 2012-08-18 19:55
I think the BOOST bios is suppose to help in addressing that in the 7950 series and the GHZ cards in the 7970 series
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: ASUS GeForce GTX 660Ti DirectCU-II TOPDoug Dallam 2012-08-16 16:28
I didn't read the entire article in depth, so if you have already stated this, excuse the redundancy.

Is the GTX 660 the same card as the 660ti TOP except for OCing?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: ASUS GeForce GTX 660Ti DirectCU-II TOPOlin Coles 2012-08-16 16:35
GTX 660 is/should be GTX 660 Ti, and the TOP edition is an ASUS special product that uses a very high factory overclock.
Report Comment
 
 
# Reader friendly graphsSudarshan_SMD 2012-08-17 05:45
@benchmarkreviews team
The graph representation you are using looks ugly and are difficult to read. It's bit confusing to read the graph, for instance I read the figure on bar, ok, but what is that figure for? I have refer the bottom of graph again to find what card it is for.
Maybe I am over-reacting, but it can be much simpler.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Reader friendly graphsOlin Coles 2012-08-17 07:27
Why don't you give us an example of how it could be done better?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Reader friendly graphsSudarshan_SMD 2012-08-17 08:53
Hi Sire,
I am glad you took a notice of it and I hope you are not joking when you are asking for example.
Maybe something like this: ##anandtech.com/show/6159/the-geforce-gtx-660-ti-review/7


Sire, I am in no way saying anything about the content of the review. It's just about the graph. Cheers.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Reader friendly graphsDoug Dallam 2012-08-18 16:01
I tend to agree with this. It's much easier to read. I've never liked the BMR graphs.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Reader friendly graphsOlin Coles 2012-08-18 16:11
Which is odd, since you've written for us and know that you're free to use/make any graph you like. Of course, then again, you never really made it into the demanding reviews that require charts.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reader friendly graphsDoug Dallamllam 2012-08-18 16:14
Right I've never created graphs or I may have suggested a different style. It's not a huge deal either. but the clearer the graph, the easier it is for readers to glean information at a glance.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Reader friendly graphshcforde 2012-08-18 19:53
OUCH!! Let's play nice
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: ASUS GeForce GTX 660Ti DirectCU-II TOPDoug Dallam 2012-08-18 20:37
What's not nice? Olin and I are both making factual comments here. Unless I've said something mean, I see nothing here that would cause me to think anything otherwise. It's good someone pointed out the graphs could be more clear. I think the reason no one has is that it is true, they are a little hard too read, and also that it's not a deal breaker. So no one said anything.
Report Comment
 
 
# electroman0076electroman0076 2012-08-19 10:49
I have always found the graphs used by benchmark reviews to be hard to read the problem is matching colors from the key to the graph, it's often hard to determine the dark colors from one another in particular when they add more cards to the mix.
Report Comment
 
 
# everything's fineresere 2012-08-20 06:10
Hi.
I mean, the review is ok. the board is good, even the comptetition is not bad.
And the graph is ok. not brilliant, but fine. Me genius? neah.
Report Comment
 
 
# Graph ClarityAmyn 2012-08-21 08:49
After reading the comments first, I was intrigued to see the graphs.
I can't say I remember taking notice of them if ever the times I have read any review.
And I think they are fine, even the color coded part. I can understand the color brown and grayish black were a bit difficult to discern, but once I got they are in order on both top and bottom, it wasn't too challenging.
Bottom line: Graphs nice and clear.
One mans opinion.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter