Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Storage arrow Intel SSD 520 Series Solid State Drive
Intel SSD 520 Series Solid State Drive E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Storage
Written by Olin Coles   
Monday, 06 February 2012
Table of Contents: Page Index
Intel SSD 520 Series Solid State Drive
Closer Look: Intel SSD 520 Series
Features and Specifications
SSD Testing Methodology
AS-SSD Benchmark
ATTO Disk Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 Tests
Iometer IOPS Performance
EVEREST Disk Benchmark
PCMark Vantage HDD Tests
Intel SSD 520 Series Conclusion

Iometer IOPS Performance

Iometer is an I/O subsystem measurement and characterization tool for single and clustered systems. Iometer does for a computer's I/O subsystem what a dynamometer does for an engine: it measures performance under a controlled load. Iometer was originally developed by the Intel Corporation and formerly known as "Galileo". Intel has discontinued work on Iometer, and has gifted it to the Open Source Development Lab (OSDL). There is currently a new version of Iometer in beta form, which adds several new test dimensions for SSDs.

Iometer is both a workload generator (that is, it performs I/O operations in order to stress the system) and a measurement tool (that is, it examines and records the performance of its I/O operations and their impact on the system). It can be configured to emulate the disk or network I/O load of any program or benchmark, or can be used to generate entirely synthetic I/O loads. It can generate and measure loads on single or multiple (networked) systems.

To measure random I/O response time as well as total I/O's per second, Iometer is set to use 4KB file size chunks over a 100% random sequential distribution at a queue depth of 32 outstanding I/O's per target. The tests are given a 50% read and 50% write distribution. While this pattern may not match traditional 'server' or 'workstation' profiles, it illustrates a single point of reference relative to our product field.

All of our SSD tests used Iometer 1.1.0 (build 08-Nov-2010) by Intel Corporation to measure IOPS performance, using a SandForce-created QD30 configuration: 4KB 100 Random 50-50 Read and Write.icf. The chart below illustrates combined random read and write IOPS over a 120-second Iometer test phase, where highest I/O total is preferred:


In our Iometer tests, which is configured to use 32 outstanding I/O's per target and random 50/50 read/write distribution, SandForce SSDs generally outperform the competition when tested with this large queue depth. The latest SATA 6Gb/s storage solutions lead the pack, and while the 240GB OCZ Vertex 3 Max IOPS Edition is on top with 83,117 IOPS, the 240GB Intel SSD 520 Series solid state drive produced 80433 peak combined IOPS. This high level of I/O is beyond the needs of casual users, and would certainly appeal to access-intensive computing environments such as database transaction workstations.

In our next section, we test linear read and write bandwidth performance and compare its speed against several other top storage products using EVEREST Disk Benchmark. Benchmark Reviews feels that linear tests are excellent for rating SSDs, however HDDs are put at a disadvantage with these tests whenever capacity is high.



# "As of 06 February 201, the Intel SSD 520 Series launches..."Dan 2012-02-06 08:35
Wow, so long ago. The age when Caracalla ruled. Did they have SSDs back then?
Report Comment
# RE: "As of 06 February 201, the Intel SSD 520 Series launches..."Olin Coles 2012-02-06 08:41
There's always got to be at least one person... the typo's been fixed smartass. :)
Report Comment
# LOL!realneil 2012-02-06 10:42
Good review Olin. Now I want one of these too. As a matter of fact, it's on the top of the list.
Report Comment
# RE: LOL!Olin Coles 2012-02-06 10:45
Thanks! This is a VERY FAST drive that costs the same as SandForce SSDs, and with a five year Intel warranty you really can't go wrong.
Report Comment
# RE: Intel SSD 520 Series Solid State DriveJerry Record 2012-02-06 15:42
Thanks for the review. I have been looking at these for some time, but still straddling the fence. My concerns are longevity of the drive. The Intel 520 & 320 series have the best reviews with the fewest number of DOA's & BSOD's with in a short time period after installation. I also understand Intel has a 5 yr waranty. But, when it holds you OS and all you software and dies. It is a hassle. Just thought I would check and see if you had any insight into the real world life expectancy of the SSD today.
Report Comment
# RE: Intel SSD 520 Series Solid State DriveEndocine 2012-02-07 02:38
Unfortunately your question can not be easily answered. But my anecdotal observation from running intel SSD's for a couple years now, in laptops and desktops - I have never seen a failure personally. I wouldn't rely on SSDs for long term data storage, and regardless of their failure rate or life expectancy, always do data backups, if you do not then you are asking for a hassle. Don't put anything critical on a consumer SSD and always do backups.

While these drives are appreciably more expensive than equally performing models from other companies, one would hope that a lot more testing and quality controls went into making them, and there's no way to test for reliability between brands in a review like this, you need to run tests for a long period of time using large numbers of drives and the expense and time of such an undertaking would be beyond the capabilities of a review site.
Report Comment
# AES 256-bit EncryptionBill McGovern 2012-04-23 07:36
I currently use a 'standard' hard drive. I keep all data on a partition other than the OS partition. I use TrueCrypt to encrypt the data partition.
I am concerned with the 520's reliance on the bios password for encryption. Isn't the bios password fairly easy to hack? If my laptop 'walks off' is my data really 100% secure or is it readily available to anyone who can garner the bios password?
Report Comment
# RE: AES 256-bit EncryptionOlin Coles 2012-04-23 07:42
Hello Bill:
Although I do not use it personally, it is my understanding that TrueCrypt works perfectly on an SSD.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: AES 256-bit EncryptionBill McGovern 2012-04-23 07:48
Sorry if I wasn't clear....I'm interested in utilizing the 520's native encryption, not TrueCrypt. My understanding is that using a software encryption program will cause additional performance and wear issues. My concern is with the 520's native, hardware encryption reliance on the bios password.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: AES 256-bit EncryptionOlin Coles 2012-04-23 07:57
Because SSDs feature automatic data encryption from the moment they initialize, there's an inherit problem giving users password-controlled access to data. There are several articles around the web (search: SandForce SSD Encryption Demystified) that explain how this happens, but in summary it's a problem that has existed as long as self-encrypting drives. Intel offers an SSD toolkit to work with the encryption key on their drives:
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: AES 256-bit EncryptionBill McGovern 2012-04-23 08:51
Olin, many thanks for the response(s). Not sure I still have a definitive answer. I'm not a security expert, nor do I want to be one. I'm simply someone who has enough computer smarts (barely) to realize the need for encryption and be able to install and utilize TrueCrypt. I am hoping that the Intel 520 eliminates the need for me to be concerned about encryption. I don't require DOD level security. I store my financial info on my laptop. If it is stolen, is my data at risk by anyone who can google for "bios password recovery"? Or would it take some very high tech hacking to get access to my SSD data? Thanks for your patience.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: AES 256-bit EncryptionOlin Coles 2012-04-23 09:01
The short answer is to use a third party software or tool, because if your drive is stolen it can be plugged into any other computer and read.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: AES 256-bit EncryptionBill McGovern 2012-04-23 09:30
Thanks again for your time and patience. I've been doing some web searching in addition to the links / strings you suggested. I ran across which talks about Intel 320 SSD encryption. If the same applies to the 520, their opinion is that the encryption is sufficient for personal or corporate use. Does their explanation negate the ability to bypass security by "plugging it into any other computer and read", or using the widely available bios password obtaining schemes?
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: AES 256-bit EncryptionOlin Coles 2012-04-23 10:01
I don't share their opinion, and believe a drive should have more than a BIOS password to protect it.
Report Comment
# Missunderstanding - ATA HD encryption is sufficient for personal or corporate useBjoern 2012-05-22 02:37
Sorry, but you mix up BIOS password protection and the ATA HD security command. This seems to be a very common mistake since you can read it all over the net.

I think the origin for this mixup is comming from the first sandforce controlled SSDs - they encrypted the data on the memory chips, but users had no way to enter a password since ATA HD security was not supported. back then it was no security enhancement at all. encryption was just used as a cheap way to randomly scatter data over the NAND as a wear leveling tool.

Setting up a ATA HD password with a selfencrypting ssd like the intel 520 series will securly encrypt all data and you wont be able to read or write to the drive without the password. the drive cannot be pluged into another computer and be accessed there. It will show up as a locked drive until you enter the correct ATA master- or user password. you wont even be able to secure erase the drive without a password - better don't loose it or you have to dump your drive. However, your mainburd has to support ATA HD security. That is a still little hard to find...

this is also not what the article you reffere to (SandForce SSD Encryption - Demystified) is stating. the articel you reffered to was mainly questioning the security of such a "black box" solution in spite of an open source solution like truecrypt. The article is also quite old.

to get a clearer view of how it actually works see the document:$file/HowToGuide_BulkDataE ncryption_final.pdf

It seems to be just a logical step to use ondisk encryption whenever possible with a SSD since SSDs loose up to 80% performance if you use truecrypt.

@Bill: Yes, ATA HD encryption is sufficient for personal or corporate use.

Report Comment
# RE: Missunderstanding - ATA HD encryption is sufficient for personal or corporate useBill McGovern 2012-05-22 09:51
Bjoern, thanks so much for your time.

From your comments, my understanding is that if my motherboard supports ATA Security, I can set a password that is unrelated to the BiOS password and is not stored in the BIOS. Correct?

One other question, if my motherboard does NOT support ATA Security, can the Intel toolkit be used to set the SSD ATA password? Do I then continue to use the toolkit to provide the password and enable access?
Report Comment
# RE: RE: Missunderstanding - ATA HD encryption is sufficient for personal or corporate useBjoern 2012-05-22 10:09
Dear Bill,

1.) Yes. The PW will be hashed and the hash will be saved in the drive. the PW can then be used to decrypted the key used for the encryption of the data on the drive itself. You can also use the drive in another computer supporting ATA security - at least if it is the same mainboard and therefore BIOS implementation of ATA security.

2.) If your BIOS does not support ATA security there is no way to use a password protected disk. the disk would be locked - without a supporting BIOS you cannot enter the password. Most systems would not even boot with a locked drive on any SATA channel. that is also the reason why you cannot set the password using the intel toolkit. imagin you would set a password in windows and then be unable to access your system anymore, because your bios actualy does not support it.

Therefore, the entire handling of the password is quite uncomfortable and you have a risk of loosing your hardware. allways remember - if you loose the password you loose not only the data but also the drive itself. It would be bricked forever.
Report Comment

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter