Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Video Card
MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Video Card E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Steven Iglesias-Hearst   
Wednesday, 18 May 2011
Table of Contents: Page Index
MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Video Card
Closer Look: MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk
MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Details
Features and Specifications
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX10: 3DMark Vantage
DX10: Street Fighter IV
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Battlefield Bad Company 2
DX11: BattleForge
DX11: Lost Planet 2
DX11: Tom Clancy's HAWX 2
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Unigine Heaven 2.1
MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Temperatures
VGA Power Consumption
MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Overclocking
Final Thoughts and Conclusion

DX11: Metro 2033

Metro 2033 is an action-oriented video game with a combination of survival horror, and first-person shooter elements. The game is based on the novel Metro 2033 by Russian author Dmitry Glukhovsky. It was developed by 4A Games in Ukraine and released in March 2010 for Microsoft Windows. Metro 2033 uses the 4A game engine, developed by 4A Games. The 4A Engine supports DirectX-9, 10, and 11, along with NVIDIA PhysX and GeForce 3D Vision.

The 4A engine is multi-threaded in such that only PhysX had a dedicated thread, and uses a task-model without any pre-conditioning or pre/post-synchronizing, allowing tasks to be done in parallel. The 4A game engine can utilize a deferred shading pipeline, and uses tessellation for greater performance, and also has HDR (complete with blue shift), real-time reflections, color correction, film grain and noise, and the engine also supports multi-core rendering.

Metro 2033 featured superior volumetric fog, double PhysX precision, object blur, sub-surface scattering for skin shaders, parallax mapping on all surfaces and greater geometric detail with a less aggressive LODs. Using PhysX, the engine uses many features such as destructible environments, and cloth and water simulations, and particles that can be fully affected by environmental factors.

NVIDIA has been diligently working to promote Metro 2033, and for good reason: it's one of the most demanding PC video games we've ever tested. When their flagship GeForce GTX 480 struggles to produce 27 FPS with DirectX-11 anti-aliasing turned to to its lowest setting, you know that only the strongest graphics processors will generate playable frame rates. All of our tests enable Advanced Depth of Field and Tessellation effects, but disable advanced PhysX options.

  • Metro 2033
    • Moderate Settings: (Very-High Quality, AAA, 16x AF, Advanced DoF, Tessellation, 180s Fraps Chase Scene)

Metro_2033.jpg

Cost Analysis: Metro 2033 (1680x1050)

  • $154.99 MSI GeForce GTX550-Ti costs $9.14 per FPS
  • $169.99 Radeon HD6850 costs $6.88 per FPS
  • $185.99 GeForce GTX 460 costs $7.98 per FPS
  • $199.99 Radeon HD6870 costs $7.13 per FPS
  • $249.99 GeForce GTX 560Ti costs $8.64 per FPS
  • $249.99 Radeon HD6950 costs $7.51 per FPS
  • $264.99 MSI GeForce GTX 560Ti Hawk costs $8.20 per FPS
  • $299.99 MSI HD6950 TwinFrozr III PE/OC costs $8.61 per FPS
  • Test Summary: Metro 2033 is hard on all video cards, and in our tests only the factory overclocked video cards delivered acceptable frame rates. It is also rather apparent that the AMD GPU's deliver better performance across the board when compared to their theoretical rivals. This game was intended to be played with PhysX enabled and we all know this is something only NVIDIA cards can do well at the moment, hopefully in the future we might see PhysX code that is better optimized for multi-core CPU's.

    Graphics Card GeForce
    GTX550-Ti (OC)
    Radeon
    HD6850
    GeForce
    GTX460 (OC)
    Radeon
    HD6870
    GeForce
    GTX 560Ti
    Radeon
    HD6950
    MSI GeForce
    GTX 560Ti Hawk
    MSI Radeon
    HD6950 TF III
    GPU Cores 192 960 336 1120 384 1408 384 1408
    Core Clock (MHz) 950 775 715 900 822 800 950 850
    Shader Clock (MHz) 1900 N/A 1430 N/A 1645 N/A 1900 N/A
    Memory Clock (MHz) 1075 1000 900 1050 1002 1250 1050 1300
    Memory Amount 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 1024MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5
    Memory Interface 192-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit



     

    Comments 

     
    # Congrats!Austin Downing 2011-05-19 18:16
    Congrats on getting quoted by MSI!
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: Congrats!Steven Iglesias-Hearst 2011-05-20 23:40
    Thanks Austin, it's nice when your work is appreciated isn't it :D
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: RE: Congrats!Steven Iglesias-Hearst 2011-05-23 23:55
    MSI liked this article so much that they posted it twice on their Facebook :P
    Report Comment
     
     
    # re:MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Video CardPinakio 2011-05-21 16:12
    I've got two questions Steven, first- are those nickel plated copper heatpipes or aluminum ones? Next, you probably have reviewed MSI's Twin-frozrII series of cards in past, do you consider this Twin-frozrIII/Hawk to be a real upgrade on what already is a very good cooling solution? I mean is it worth the extra $$? Regards.

    * Not to mention a fine effort again from you guys:)
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: re:MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Video CardSteven Iglesias-Hearst 2011-05-22 04:22
    Thanks for the positive comment, Pinaio.
    1)They are nickel plated copper heatpipes.
    2)I have not actually reviewed a video card with the twin frozr II, but if you look at Bruce Norman's review of the MSI N560GTX-Ti Twin Frozr II here at BmR #benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=689&Itemid=72&limit=1&limitstart=1 you will see they are essentially the same cooler with a different shroud and different fans (as I described in my final thoughts). The extra $$ is not necessarily just for the cooler but the different features the Hawk card has over the Twin Frozr II card.

    Hope this helps.
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: RE: re:MSI N560GTX Ti Hawk Video CardPinakio 2011-05-22 22:19
    Thank you for the explanation:) Yes, after looking carefully through the feature set, it's obvious that the 'Hawks' are more aggressive in terms of factory OC and overvolting plus there is the so called 'propeller' fan. Anyway looking fwd for more reviews.
    Report Comment
     
     
    # MSI 560 HAWKgangsta072 2011-05-23 03:47
    Would buy that adapter just because of the looks :D
    Report Comment
     
     
    # PiccoloAviral 2011-05-30 07:55
    Hi Steven, I just purchased this card and it does performs brilliantly! However, I cant manage to make it reduce its PWM phase usage (all LEDs are always lit) and I cant even obtain this app that you speak of.. How to go about this?
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: PiccoloSteven Iglesias-Hearst 2011-05-30 13:41
    Insert your driver and utility dvd and click on the afterburner icon. You will see a button at the bottom called 'N560GTX-Ti Hawk APS'

    Hope this helps.
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: RE: PiccoloAviral 2011-05-30 21:16
    Thanks a ton.. works like a charm!!
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: Piccologangsta072 2011-05-31 06:33
    not necessary - leave it as it is
    Report Comment
     
     
    # Great reviewChris 2011-08-03 22:15
    After doing a lot of research, I decided to buy this card. It seems like the 560Ti to beat performance-wise. Will report back when it arrives.

    MSI's bizarre marketing aside, the cooler seems to be the best custom air cooler on the market right now.
    Report Comment
     
     
    # guideAlireza 2011-10-03 12:18
    Hi Steven;
    I've got a pretty hard to answer question!! I'm totally confused to buy this card (MSI N560 GTX Ti hawk)or ATI HD 6950 2GB reference version and flash it to HD 6970 2GB which is quit stronger than this card.But I don't know anything about the risks of this flashing process and consequences. The price of this card (MSI) is about 30$ cheaper than 2GB version of 6950 in our country. But XFX version of 6950 2gb has the same price as the MSI card has.What do you say Steven? (power consumption of this card is higher than HD 6950)
    Thank you very much.
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: guideSteven Iglesias-Hearst 2011-10-03 12:37
    Good question Alireza, one that I can only answer in part though.

    Buying a reference 6950 to flash to a 6970 is a risky choice. First you must find a compatible BIOS and then of course you have to flash it.

    If the flash goes wrong or you use an incompatible BIOS you will only see a blank screen next time you boot, some 6950's have dual BIOS switch to overcome this issue but some don't. If the flash does not work out you will have to install another card in slot one and the failed flash card in slot 2 and use the -i function of atiflash to detect the correct GPU to and reflash the BIOS to the correct card.

    For example where the failed GPU is in slot 2 the command "atiflash -i" would list any installed GPU's starting with 0 upwards, the second card would typically be 1. The command to reflash that would be "atiflash -r -f 1 biosname.bin"

    While the GTX560Ti HAWK has higher power consumption, my testing shows that it is better than the 6950 2gb at the tested resolutions in most tests.

    If you do manage to flash a HD6950 to a HD6970 you would see a big rise in power consumption and heat production but obviously you would get much better FPS.

    What are your thoughts?
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: RE: guideDavid Ramsey 2011-10-03 13:01
    I have seen several 6550s that won't flash to 6970 at all (like the one I have). This probably means AMD now has dedicated 6950 dies. Or something.

    The one 6950 I've played with that would flash to 6970 would always crash under heavy load, probably because it only had a single 6-pin power connector, rather than the dual 6-pin power connectors a "real" 6970 has.

    Bottom line: if you can flash your 6950 to a 6970 and it runs well, great, but don't buy any 6950 expecting to be able to do this.
    Report Comment
     
     
    # power suply?darky 2012-01-17 16:10
    i plan to buy FSP - 750 Watt Aurum GOLD ATX 12V V2.3 80+ Gold
    no i see it have only 18 Amps available per lane (12x18=216w)
    you think is possible to use it or ill better start looking for a single lane ( CM Silent Pro M850)
    thanks in advance for reply
    Report Comment
     
     
    # RE: power suply?Steven Iglesias-Hearst 2012-01-18 16:36
    Look into the Corsair TX or HX series, 750 is plenty powerful for just one GPU.
    Report Comment
     

    Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

    Search Benchmark Reviews
    QNAP Network Storage Servers

    Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter