Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video Card

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video Card E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Olin Coles   
Thursday, 24 March 2011
Table of Contents: Page Index
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video Card
GeForce GTX 590 Basic Details
NVIDIA Gemini Internal Details
Features and Specifications
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX9 SSAO: Mafia II
DX10: 3DMark Vantage
DX10: Crysis Warhead
DX11: 3DMark11
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Battlefield Bad Company 2
DX11: BattleForge
DX11: Lost Planet 2
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Unigine Heaven 2.1
NVIDIA Gemini Overclocking
GeForce GTX 590 Temperatures
VGA Power Consumption
GeForce GTX 590 Conclusion

GeForce GTX 590 Conclusion

IMPORTANT: Although the rating and final score mentioned in this conclusion are made to be as objective as possible, please be advised that every author perceives these factors differently at various points in time. While we each do our best to ensure that all aspects of the product are considered, there are often times unforeseen market conditions and manufacturer changes which occur after publication that could render our rating obsolete. Please do not base any purchase solely on our conclusion, as it represents our product rating specifically for the product tested which may differ from future versions. Benchmark Reviews begins our conclusion with a short summary for each of the areas that we rate.

NVIDIA designed the GeForce GTX 590 to be the best graphics card available on the market, and they contend that it's a better total solution than the Radeon AMD Radeon HD 6990. I will discuss graphics performance in a moment, but first let's look at the other factors that come into play. NVIDIA's Gemini graphics card consumes a few more watts of power at idle than the Radeon HD 6990, but under load the GTX 590 consumes 46W more than its competitor. Yet, as a direct result of superior cooling efficiency, less heat byproduct is produced by the GTX 590 video card when matched against the Radeon HD 6990. Fan noise from the cooling unit offers the largest contrast we've found between these two products: the GeForce GTX 590 operated quietly under full load, while the Radeon HD 6990 was significantly louder. Let's not forget that the GTX 590 is a full inch shorter, and can fit in more computer cases. Comparing these two products on overall size, heat output, and operational noise, the evidence all points back in favor of NVIDIA's GeForce GTX 590 being the better product.

The closest competition GeForce GTX 590 has is the AMD Radeon HD 6990 in terms of single-card graphics performance, or two GeForce GTX 570's paired together into a SLI set. We've included a pair of AMD Radeon HD 6870's joined in a CrossFireX set, just to illustrate other options. Although NVIDIA has previously informed us the GTX 590 performs to 1.5x the level of two GTX 580's in SLI, we've added them to the results of our tests as well. Now on to the graphics performance results... which take some attention to fully appreciate.

After running benchmarks on each video card through fourteen different tests, the results occasionally placed one product better than the other, and then vice versa. Beginning with DirectX 9 graphics performance in Mafia II with all of the setting turned up high and played with SSAO enabled and PhysX turned off, the GeForce GTX 590 produced an impressive lead over the Radeon HD 6990 but couldn't quite match GeForce GTX 570 SLI performance levels. Call of Duty: Black Ops was tweaked to use the absolute highest quality settings possible, and yet still had extremely fluid video performance during action-packed multiplayer maps for both products.

In the more modern DirectX 10 game tests, Crysis Warhead kept the GTX 590 even with the Radeon HD 6990 and a few frames ahead of the GTX 570 SLI set. 3dMark Vantage used high-end DirectX 10 settings to place all three contenders approximately equal in the Jane Nash test, but both GeForce products would excel past the Radeon HD 6990 in New Calico tests. Battlefield: Bad Company 2 used 8x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering to produce far superior framerates on the GTX 590 compared to the Radeon HD 6990, but slightly trailed the pair GTX 570's in SLI.

In the DirectX 11 tests, Futuremark's 3DMark11 benchmark suite strained our high-end graphics cards with only mid-level settings displayed at 720p, yet the HD6990 generally matched up well to the GeForce GTX 590 as well as both GTX 570's in SLI. Aliens vs Predator pushed the Radeon HD 6990 to produce considerably higher average framerates than the GTX 590, while also surpassing the GeForce GTX 570 SLI set. Lost Planet 2 played well at 2x AA, allowing the GeForce GTX 590 to pass the 570 SLI set and leap beyond Radeon HD 6990 performance capabilities. Metro 2033 is a demanding game even when played with high-end graphics, but the Radeon HD 6990 edged past both the GTX 590 and GTX 570 SLI set. Unigine Heaven positioned the Radeon HD 6990 well ahead of the GeForce GTX 590, and only slightly ahead of the GTX 570 SLI pair.

My tally of these results have the GTX 590 ahead in five tests, equal in five, and trailing in five. Based on how the GeForce GTX 590 and Radeon HD 6990 swap paint in most tests or go tit-for-tat in others, graphics performance is roughly equal between these two cards in my book. Compared against the GTX 570 SLI set, the benchmark scores give the SLI set a lead in seven tests, even in two, and trailing in three. If it's a battle between GeForce GTX 590 and Radeon HD 6990 with all things (performance, heat, and noise), most would agree that the GTX 590 is the better choice. For those looking to match graphics frame rate performance at the expense of all the previously mentioned items, plus installation space, then a SLI set of GeForce GTX 570's will also work well.


Each GPU on the GeForce GTX 590 offers two graphics adapters, which are doubled to four with the NF200-P-SLI-A3 chip. Three dual-link DVI ports and a mini-DisplayPort 1.1s output really open up visual functionality, allowing the GTX 590 to power four concurrent displays at once. DL-DVI #1 and DL-DVI #2 are routed from the first GF110 GPU, while DL-DVI #3 and the mini-DP are routed from the second GPU. It's great to see NVIDIA finally include a DisplayPort option, which enables display expansion as the technology catches up with consumers. Gamers will likely take advantage of triple-display surround, or even 3D Vision Surround for those of us who want the most out of our NVIDIA 3D-Vision kit.

GeForce GTX 590 uses 40nm NVIDIA GF110 GPUs identical to those in the flagship GTX 580 model, and with the added thermal management system they've worked perfectly in Gemini's dual-GPU package. The constant move towards building with a smaller die process is rather insignificant in the grand scheme of things, as was proved when the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 successfully launched at 65nm instead of the expected 55nm process. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) is already building 32nm processors for other clientele, but just not to the level needed to create GPUs.

Appearance is a much more subjective matter, especially since this particular rating doesn't have any quantitative benchmark scores to fall back on. NVIDIA's GeForce GTX series has used a fairly recognizable design for the past year, and with the exception of angular corners the GTX 590 looks very similar to the recently launched GTX 580 and 570 models. Gemini's relatively compact size helps this dual-GPU video card to do what the Radeon HD 6990 could not: fit two processors into a card the size of products designed with only one GPU. Some add-in card partners may offer their own unique designs by incorporating an improved cooling solution, but most will simply dress up the original design with colorful fan shroud graphics.

Value is a fast moving target, and please believe me when I say that it changes by the minute in this industry. The premium-priced GeForce GTX 590 "Gemini" graphics card demonstrates NVIDIA's ability to innovate the graphics segment while leading their market. As of launch day 23 March 2011, the GeForce GTX 590 has been assigned a $699 MSRP. In terms of value, the GeForce GTX 590 costs roughly the same as AMD's Radeon HD 6990. To compare one cards' value to another based solely on video frame rates, then identical pricing fools you into thinking these cards offer approximately the same value. Just remember that only one of these video cards can offer multi-display 3D gaming, standard form-factor installation, and PhysX technology.

When I reviewed the AMD Radeon HD 6990 for the launch event two weeks ago, I genuinely liked the card's ability to produce unmatched performance using the sheer strength of two top-end GPUs. NVIDIA answered back with a product just as powerful, but refined so many of Gemini's smaller details that the scales now tip in their favor. Depending on your collection of games and settings, graphics performance is fairly even between the GeForce GTX 590 and Radeon HD 6990. But unfortunately for the Radeon HD 6990, modern graphics cards are capable of a lot more than simply producing frame rates. Consumers are looking at supplemental features, such as stereoscopic 3D functionality, graphical enhancements, affordable multi-display possibilities, broad software support, and stable drivers. NVIDIA 3D Vision, APEX PhysX, The Way It's Meant to be Played developer support, surround support with inexpensive DVI monitors, and Forceware drivers all deliver these things. AMD's solutions are either no widely supported (DisplayPort), unpopular (AMD HD3D), or lack affordable integration (Eyefinity).

GeForce GTX 590 is the ultimate enthusiast graphics card intended for affluent top-end gamers. It may match the competition's solution in terms of frame rate performance, but then again it also operates at lower temperatures, and does so very quietly. For elite-level gamers and hardware enthusiasts the GeForce GTX 590 represents the best you can buy, and delivers on its price point. Of course, putting together a GeForce GTX 570 SLI set is still an option, but it will consume more power and dissipate additional heat. If you're looking to match performance on the cheap, value-seeking gamers could purchase one GeForce GTX 570 now while saving to upgrade with a second unit later. You'll take up more room inside the computer case and a multi-card setup could require a new power supply unit, but it's possible so long as you're willing to make concessions. If you can afford the asking price, the GeForce GTX 590 'Gemini' graphics card delivers the best total package that money can buy.

Do you agree with my assessment of the GeForce GTX 590 video card? Leave comments below, or ask questions in our Forum.


+ Best total package for DX11 video games
+ Short profile fits into standard size computer cases
+ One card drives four displays or 3D Vision Surround
+ Fermi GPUs enable 3D Vision and PhysX functionality
+ Cooling fan operates at very quiet acoustic levels
+ Includes DisplayPort connectivity for future display tech
+ Supports quad-SLI for unmatched potential


- Extremely expensive enthusiast product
- Heated exhaust vents out to computer case
- Does not include HDMI output for HDTVs

Related Articles:



# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video Cardmihai 2011-03-24 06:37
good review, great battle, 590gtx ugly competitor, for me is no choice
Report Comment
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video CardOlin Coles 2011-03-24 06:40
Thank you Mihai. What features made you want one card more than the other?
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video Cardmihai 2011-03-24 08:27
good question ! there are not big things (power consumption,eyefinit y 4gb of vram)
but i will wait until aftermarket coolers for 6990 appears
anyway i appreciate great competitions like this one
Report Comment
# Poor reviewGT40 2011-03-25 06:01
For a balance please redo the temp/fan noise on the same test you mesured the power draw with. Then also do the power test on the Furmark test.

If the results show low power use in Furmark for the 590, you know the card is activating its limiter, therefor the temp/noise reading are not realistic.

Simply put the power/temp/fan noise should be done on the games as you benched them, its all to easy to program a driver to fool one application to make it look and sound good.

Report Comment
# RE: Poor ReviewCom-Tek Chris 2011-03-25 08:41
I think these guys spend more time than you think ATI FANBOY. The results these guys give don't come out of a cracker jack box. Read the whole review. They give you power readings at idle and under the heaviest load. The sound results were simply put, ATI is louder. I own the 6990, its louder and somewhat annoying, but I deal with it because I have noise canceling headphones. Do you trolls even read the whole articles....? Or just bits and pieces?
Report Comment
# RE: Poor reviewOlin Coles 2011-03-25 10:09
Poor review? If that's the case, go hold your breath for that special request!
Report Comment
# VS 6990Summary 2011-03-24 06:42
after all gtx 590 is better why? preformance maybe is not as great as i expected and found lack of it in gpu/mem clocks...3Gb vs 4GB for higher resolutions is lack too..but i had previously ati 5870(paid so much for buggy card with buggy memory) and what i suffered from? first card was an issue because of memory chips of samsung not form hynx and random GSOD happened...niether bios change fix that problem...rma'd card second was good but again samsung chips did not allow me to clock card higher than 1mhz even it had great afetmarket cooler....second the driver issue cf scaling in games tess' performance and on and on...i considered on going on 6970 but bought gtx 580 and was amazed with performance and driver release adn support...drivers was released in 18-th january and new release was not needed...but when i had 5870 driver fixes or many issues and games was released every 1-2 months ???? that is mine expierence with ati that i don't want to live again ,thanks but no way...about gtx 590 this card offer cuda(i needed so much for my study at university),3d vision,now multimonitor setup,physx and many other stable technologioes by nvidia that are certified....even if it is not faster than amd 6990 which is not faster that much than gtx 590 for me quality is number one and nvidia offer that....i am not fanboy of nvidia niether ati but i had many products from nvidia staring with agp card geforce 2 MX440 that served me great for long period of time that 8600gt,8600 gts,9500gt than ati 4870 that had also driver issues and 4870x2 with heat issues...than came 5870 and finally gtx 580 which i plan soon to sli with another one card...
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video CardDavid Ramsey 2011-03-24 11:32
Like the ammo-case packaging, although I assume that's only for the review cards. Did it come with the magazines, too?
Report Comment
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video CardOlin Coles 2011-03-24 11:39
Nope, those are for my AR-15's. As you already know, I shoot all review samples after testing.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video CardSteven Iglesias-Hearst 2011-03-24 13:15
Good job you couldn't over-volt this card or you really would have to shoot this sample... Damn shame about these cards blowing up.
Report Comment
# Shoot? What?Eric Garay 2011-03-24 15:29
LOL! Do you literally shoot them? Or, are you just messing around? Because...damn. :p
Report Comment
# RE: Shoot? What?Olin Coles 2011-03-24 15:35
I shoot the big ones, but throw back the youngin's. :)

Actually, the hardware sits in a big box for retests and other projects. After a year or so, they become gifts or sold for what little they're still worth.

Hey- I never did see any of your work from PAX! Hope it was fun, and worth the visit.
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video CardFxAsus 2011-03-24 12:19
I think with two 6870 you are done this year
Report Comment
# What holdSuccellus 2011-03-24 16:43
What hold Nvidia from topping is the lack of memory in game really pushing like A10C full, Nvidia Short of memory especially on triple + monitor settings.
They really need to put some 2g or even 3g of mem on those 580 cards.
Report Comment
# Quick heads upCharles McGraw 2011-03-24 17:34
Great review; as a quick heads up though, on the Features & Spec's page you have the GTX 590 listed as 7.7 Gigapixels per second.

I'm pretty sure that's not right.
Report Comment
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Gemini Video CardRobert17 2011-03-24 20:57
Nice review. Interesting how one week, one product, can up-end the previous high-water mark.

So what's up next week?
Report Comment
# Amazing ArticleCom-Tek Chris 2011-03-24 21:18
I always appreciate the time that is taken into all the tests. I also appreciate the non bias assessments made. I currently own the 6990 (Great Card but it is noisy but I have the Logitech G930 Headset and it offers some noise cancellation) & I own 2x 580 GTX's in SLI, also beastly cards. If I had an extra $700 to bang out I would prob buy this new 590 but the budget says................oh wait..........I just sold 40 computers today to a, gimme a week, I got this baby!
Report Comment
# I was surprisedBruceBruce 2011-03-24 21:35
The thing that surprised me the most was the price. But when I look at the clocks, and I see that it is basically the same performance as two GTX 570 cards, well it makes sense since thaey are hanging at $350 right now. It's kinda funny how ATI got slammed for making the HD 5970 from two 5850 chips, and then NVIDIA decides to follow the same path. I know the GTX 590 isn't gimped on shaders, but it's so hamstrung by it's low clocks that it may as well be. Well, they pinned a target on the HD 6990 and they hit it, center of mass! Or was that a headshot?
Report Comment
# RE I was SurprisedCom-Tek Chris 2011-03-24 22:18
HEAD SHOT!!!!! coming soon to give reviewers a chance to test the real gaming pc's. Sorry had to do it, please don't kill me, lol.
Report Comment
# does not seem to be as unbias a review as should betoros 2011-03-24 21:54
First I am not a diehard fan of either brand I go with who has the best overall product at the time. But its clear whenever a Nvidia product is launched it is always tested with a bias on games that have the nvidia tag on them. This is obviously going to make there card perform better.

When you look at the things that are not bias towards either product IE Heaven benchmark. Thats where you see the real difference in the cards. All this end talk about features is complete garbage. You can say the same for ATI there card and 3d bluray is far superior then the Nvidia solution. Eyefinity maybe a novel feature but it does work. Something Nvidia has yet to even come close to matching. Heck this is first card with 3 monitors support. Also the displayport is a mute point because ATI is now including a displayport adaptor that illiminates the super high cost of this solution among other reasons could state that this is not a fd it will eventually be the standard. If your going to skew your review because you like nvidia just do it at the begining. Its getting extremely old seeing the bait and switch from both sides.
Report Comment
# Fan-boys cry the loudestOlin Coles 2011-03-24 22:27
You know what else gets old? Fan boy trolling. It's obvious you favor ATI, and that's your right as a consumer. I'm a reviewer without a horse in this race, so I couldn't care less for who wins the graphics war every week. If you researched my position a little more before you made rude comments on the work I've just delivered, you might see that. Just two weeks ago I was highlighting the AMD Radeon HD 6990. Anyone with their head pulled from the clouds would realize that the GTX 590 is virtually the same card, only with more polish.

Some of your remarks are a relief to me, because they show how uninformed you truly are. According to you, features like PhysX, 3D Vision, and CUDA support don't matter. I suggest you start asking around, because like it or not those 'garbage' features help sell these products.

By the way, those 'biased' NVIDIA games that always score the highest... games like BattleForge and Battlefield Bad Company 2... those are AMD co-developed games, not NVIDIA.
Report Comment
# RE: Fan-boys cry the loudestCom-Tek Chris 2011-03-24 22:56
In all honesty with "toros" comment I really don't think he read all of your review or any of it for that matter. I would say his comment is based on 1 of 2 things. 1. He got this email and 2. He only read Page 19 Paragraph 2 line 1 where "NVIDIA designed the GeForce GTX 590 to be the best graphics card available on the market".

Then Toro's jumped on this forum and blogged his ATI Fanboy Mumbo Jumbo. But you know what, that's ok, Handicap need a place to lay their heads at night. If he had read the whole review he would have seen that facts. 1. The 6990 has its pro's and con's. Fact 2, The Nvidia and ATI cards are pretty neck and neck. Fact 3, the 590 won 5, tied 5 and (barley) lost 5. I don't know how anyone could have taken this review as "BIAS" towards Nvidia. I am an Nvidia fan, but I own a 6990 and 2 580 GTX's, they are both powerful................nevermind, I know if Toros is reading this it wont make sense so i will save my time.
Report Comment
# RE: Fan-boys cry the loudestVik 2011-03-26 17:05
I think the points about NVidia's features are valid, but I disagree with what was said about Eyefinity support. In the past the adapters or dp capable monitors may indeed have been an expensive proposition, but given that the 6990 ships with an assortment of adapters, I don't think that is a fair point to try and make. I am running Eyefinity on the older 5970 now with 3 DVI monitors and one adapter. I wish those cheap adapters and free adapter were available back when I set this up, but early adopters pay that price.
Interesting read though. I am anxious to see how the cards compare at their overclocked overvolted limits on reference cooler.
Report Comment
# seems unbiased enoughSempifi99 2011-04-01 10:26
I would think the review is plenty unbiased. But I would hardly discount features, since that is where the real difference between ati cards and nvidia cards are. Both brands can provide more than enough horsepower for most games at anything but extreme resolutions and their price points for performance are similar. But I think it is funny that someone who complains about bias in a review notes such a strong bias in his reply.
Report Comment
# You know...Jake 2011-03-25 08:26
I am the kind of consumer that actually check this cards when they lower the price (you know, as long its using the same DirectX and not a lot different from other features), does the card industry will get better or will be a very stable year after this last movements?
For all I know next year could have big stuff for processors.
Report Comment
# Finally!Rob 2011-03-25 09:57
It's about time to see some neck-and-neck battles between ATi and Nviida again. I was especially surprised to see how well the 6990 made improvement in Dx11 titled games as before it was for the most part Nvidia based products rather outperforming in Dx11 titled games. Now I just have to wait a few years for the next DirectX (12 perhaps) and then I will replace this GTX480 with a revised Dx12 card rather than just jumping the gun. Good to finally see some strong competition for a change between both manufacturers.

The rest of you fanboys should really stop honestly. In the case of the 6990 and 590, what is there really to say one card is superior to the other? I don't find 50w less, 5c degrees less or a card that runs EVER SO quieter to the other good ways of saying my card beats yours. There is no real pure power difference. So I must agree with Colin above and say they are both virtually the same exact cards.

I just have to stick with purchasing Nvidia however for my 3D setup, no biggie.
Report Comment
# Image QualityRamin 2011-03-25 13:42
I have a question from "benchmark reviews"

I was wondering if the 6990 still had the aggressive AF optimizations which results in texture shimmering. I am referring to the AF optimization discovered earlier and brought up in an nViDIA blog.

I really hate texture shimmering, that is a deciding factor for me. If I have to switch setting around in Catalyst in order to get rid of shimmering the benchmark results would not indicate the actual performance I'll get from 6990.

Thanks in advance.
Report Comment
# What I see...BruceBruce 2011-03-25 14:28
In the night scenes of the Unigine Heaven Benchmark, I see severe (bat-like) shimmering on the stones below some of the street lights. Both scenes are towards the end of the benchmark. Is this what you are referring to?
Report Comment
# Videos in this pageRamin 2011-03-25 21:48
Yep what I mean by shimmering can be seen in videos posted in this page:

Usually shimmering (if it's present) can easily be seen in Half-Life 2 in road or railroad parts of the map which extend long into the horizon.

I remember having horrible shimmering in HL2 back when I had 7800GTX.

In the Unigine night scene you mention, can you get rid of shimmering by setting Catalyst AI to high or turning it off altogether?

I suppose in the same Unigine scene , GTX 590 is not showing any shimmering?

Thanks for the reply btw.
Report Comment
# CorrrectionRamin 2011-03-25 21:50
Ooops! My mistake, scratch that URL. This page has contains the videos d_6850/s09.php
Report Comment
# RE: Image QualityOlin Coles 2011-03-25 16:09
Yes, because they are Cayman-based, they still show a collision of ranges in AF-specific testing. Most people will never see the end-effects, but you can see them on tests made for this purpose.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: Image QualityRamin 2011-03-25 22:03
Thanks for the reply Olin I just noticed that you are the reviewer.

Can you get rid of shimmering by fiddling with Cat AI ? Does the GTX 590 show the same amount of shimmering as well? In HL2 particularly, since it can easily be detected when moving the camera.
Report Comment
# Struggles of Small BusinessPrasad 2011-03-26 06:27
This Graphics card is very expensive. If the company reduces its price then so many people, students and other game lovers can enjoy the games.
Report Comment
# RE: Struggles of Small BusinessVik 2011-03-26 18:02

Neither AMD nor NVidia are charities. You want a bleeding edge product, prepare to bleed the cash.
Report Comment
# RE: RE: Struggles of Small BusinessAvro Arrow 2011-03-27 17:10
Amen to that Vik! :D
Report Comment
# Quad-SLI / Triple SLI?Sempifi99 2011-04-01 10:19
I enjoyed reading the article though the only thing I wish was here was some results of a quad-SLI of 590s and a triple-SLI of 580s. I know that it would not help everyone but I am sure at least everyone would find it an interesting read. Especially if Nvidia claims that the 590 has 1.5x the performance of the 580. Also it would be especially useful to me since I currently have 2x 580 in SLI for surround-3D gaming but have been finding them a little underwhelming, my resolution is 6160 x 1080, or essentially 6x 1080p monitors at 60Hz each. I have a little time left with the step up program and would love to see an article comparing the quad vs. triple SLI setups. Also triple-SLI 570s would be an interesting inclusion too.
Report Comment
# I was wonderingjec 2011-04-03 23:31
I was just wondering when I was reading this review...does nvidia ever put HDMI ports in any of their cards at all. I've owned both types in my systems and lately don't recall many nvidias at all having hdmi ports. maybe its not a big deal for many people. what do you guys think? all in all great and fair review. first time coming to this site, great work.
Report Comment
# RE: I was wonderingSteven Iglesias-Hearst 2011-04-04 00:31
Welcome to BmR jec.

Yes NVIDIA does include HDMI with their cards, I can only assume it is up to AIB partners whether it will be mini-HDMI or a full size port.
Report Comment
# Re: I was wonderingSempifi99 2011-04-04 13:52
Nvidia puts a HDMI on many of their cards, though with dual link DVI supporting more bandwidth I don't see any need for a direct HDMI cable plug, since with an adapter you get the same thing. I would rather have more dual link DVI plugs and just use adapters. The only acception I can think of is for cards that would be meat to be used for HTPC since there are no TVs I can think of off the top of my head that would requier a dual link DVI connection, though with some of the 3d tvs today I could be wrong. But since dual link DVI supports the most bandwidth I would think it be more adventagious to have more dual link DVI and just have a DVI ? HDMI cable.
Report Comment

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews

Like Benchmark Reviews on FacebookFollow Benchmark Reviews on Twitter