Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Cooling arrow Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Heatsink
Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Heatsink E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Cooling
Written by David Ramsey   
Monday, 14 February 2011
Table of Contents: Page Index
Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Heatsink
Closer Look: Achilles Plus Prototype
Heatsink Test Methodology
Testing and Results
CPU Cooler Final Thoughts and Conclusion

Testing and Results

For this test, I used the following heat sinks in addition to the Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Prototype Sample:

  • Thermalright Venomous X
  • Cooler Master V6 GT
  • CoolIt Vantage A.L.C.
  • CoolIt ECO A.L.C.
  • ProlimaTech Super Mega
  • Corsair Hydro Series H50
  • Corsair Hydro Series H70
  • Antec Kühler H2O 620

For heat sinks without a stock fan (including the Achilles SD1484), I used a Thermalright TR-FDB-12-1600 fan, which puts out 63.7CFM at 28dBa according to Thermalright. This mid-range fan provides good air flow and reasonable noise levels. For "apples to apples" testing, where each heat sink is tested with the same fan, I used a Delta AFC1212D. This high-performance PWM fan is rated at 113CFM at a claimed 46.5dBa at full speed...which means that while it moves quite a bit of air, it's very loud.

The Intel Core i7-950 I used in this test runs much hotter than the Core i7-920 I'd used previously. At 1.35 volts, with a BCLK of 175 MHz, the 4,025 MHz CPU pumped out enough heat to stress the very best heat sinks. AIDA64 would report throttling once any single core reached 100 degrees Celsius; any throttling resulted in cancelling the test and recording a "FAIL". Although this overclocked and overvolted Core i7-950 represents an extreme, these are expensive, high-end heat sinks.

The chart below summarizes the results with the stock fans (hotter temperatures towards the top of the chart, and cooler temperatures towards the bottom). The twin-fan Cooler Master V6 GT and Corsair H70 have a real advantage here, since their dual fans move more air than the stock single fan of any of the other units.

Stock Fan Tests

Heat Sink

Thermal Difference
(degrees Celsius)
Difference
from SD1484
CoolIt ECO A.L.C. 75.2 +6.2
Corsair H50 73.1 +4.1
CoolIt Vantage A.L.C. (extreme) 73.0 +4.0
Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Proto 69.0 +0.0
Corsair H70 (low) 67.7 -1.3
ProlimaTech Super Mega 67.2 -1.8
Antec Kühler H2O 620 65.9 -3.1
Corsair H70 (high) 65.3 -3.7
Thermalright Venomous X 63.0 -6.0
Cooler Master V6 GT 61.2 -7.8

With its dual fans providing an aggregate airflow of over 180CFM, the Cooler Master V6 GT takes the lead here, keeping the blistering hot Core i7-950 almost 8 degrees cooler than the Achilles Plus prototype. But the Xigmatec acquits itself pretty well here, coming in only 1.8 degrees hotter than the ProlimaTech Super Mega and 4 degrees cooler than the CoolIt Vantage A.L.C. This four-degree break is the largest difference between adjacent coolers in this test. Xigmatek's existing Achilles II SD1284 cooler comes with an 85CFM fan; if the retail Achilles Plus SD1484 comes with a similar fan, the temperature results in this test would be somewhat better than the ones I obtained with the 63.7CFM Thermalright fan.

Delta High Speed Fan Tests

Heat Sink

Thermal Difference
(degrees Celsius)
Difference
from Vantage
Corsair H50 68.1 +7.0
CoolIt Vantage A.L.C. 67.8 +6.7
Corsair H70 64.7 +3.6
CoolIt ECO A.L.C. 64.3 +3.2
Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Proto 61.1 +0.0
Cooler Master V6 GT 59.5 -1.6
ProlimaTech Super Mega 59.4 -1.7
Antec Kühler H2O 620 58.7 -2.4
Thermalright Venomous X 58.0 -3.1

With more airflow, courtesy of the Delta 113CFM fan, the lineup changes. The Corsair H50 and CoolIt Vantage A.L.C. betray their first-generation designs with bottom-of-the-pack performances, while the Xigmatek Achilles Plus prototype manages an 8-degree improvement, which brings it to within 3 degrees of the top-performing cooler in this test, and only 1.6 degrees short of the Cooler Master V6 GT. This is an excellent result considering the other air coolers are either almost twice the depth (the Super Mega and the Venomous X) or have two fans with much more airflow (V6 GT).



 

Comments 

 
# Faulty assumption.Olle P 2011-02-15 07:49
Two fans mounted in series will *not* move twice as much air as a single fan. (In free air they will move just a little more than a single fan.)
They will, however, be the equivalent of a *stronger* fan, able to build a higher pressure. That is good if the air flow is very constricted by dense fins or so, like in the case of the H70 cooler. It's a very noisy solution though.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 08:50
Let's try a though experiment: take two 90CFM fans as used on the V6 GT. Put them in series-- the output of one blowing towards the input of another-- but space the fans 6 feet apart. In this configuration the aggregate air flow of the fans is obviously 180CFM, although it's really two independent air streams.

The question is "How close do the fans have to be before the aggregate air flow drops?" A secondary question would be "How does the introduction of an obstruction affect this?"

Obviously a 90CFM fan isn't going to blow 90CFM through the tightly-packed fins of a typical cooler, but I don't know of a good way to measure this. Custom PC magazine did a fan test roundup some years back where they measured how long a given fan took to inflate a garbage bag of known volume, and that might be worth trying.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 09:20
Time to get a digital anemometer and test it. It sounds like a very interesting experiment.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 12:43
Yeah, well, the trouble with that is that commercial anemometers are designed to test air flow in HVAC systems, and generally have low-end CFM ranges of about 80CFM, which means they wouldn't be able to give readings on the majority of fans...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 13:03
Majority of the fans? I'd say most of the enthusiasts use fans below the 80CFM Spec. Fans included with heat-sinks or radiators normally stay between 30-80CFM range. Only when you're looking for an specific test or if you're overclocking a lot your components you'll go for a delta or any other 80+ CFM fan, because they sound like vacuums.

Also, for measuring performance, readings should be measured after passing the radiator/heatsink. So even if a 80CFM fan is mounted, I doubt you'll see 80 CFM after passing trough the heatsink, and will also depend a lot on static pressure for sure.

Anyway, I think there are a lot of fans to test in those conditions. The only problem I can think off, is that we should tap or make a tunnel after the heatsink/rad to make proper measurements, I suppose. Here's a simple, yet useful example at Xtreme Systems: ##youtube.com/watch?v=8AmF1Z0M8JY
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 13:16
Um, yeah. Isn't "majority" similar in meaning to "most of"?

If we're measuring a fan's output to see how well it corresponds to its advertised rating, we'd need to measure the fan in isolation. The performance with specific heat sinks might be interesting, but in that case we'd be testing the heat sink more than the fan...

The video was interesting, but with no explanation of what was being measured or how it was being measured, I didn't get any useful information from it. I assume the orange meter at the right was showing volts, and perhaps one of the three devices to the left was reading out CFM, but I don't really know.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 13:29
Yes, but really, most of the PC fans work above 80CFM?
Oh, It's my fault not to include a link to the specific thread. From left to right: anemometer, sound meter 1, sound meter 2 (on a cellphone, which I don't trust), Fan Voltage. I thought the video was clear enough to see the units, but maybe because I saw it at 1080p res.
I think we'd be testing both heatsink/radiator performance and fan performance.
Here's the link for complete info at XS: ##xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=259802

Regards.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 13:40
It would be nice to know which anemometer he was using, since it can obviously handle low air flows...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 13:51
OK, now that I've re-read your phrase I need to apologize because I misread it. You actually meant low-end CFM ranges about 80 CFM, and I understood it the other way. Now all makes sense.

About the model, I could easily read it while watching the video. It's an AM-4836V. Google lead me here: #starmeter.en.made-in-china.com/product/gobQWtUjYLcu/China-Multi-Functions-Thermo-Anemometer-AM-4836V-.html
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 13:58
There doesn't seem to be any way to get one except to order it directly from China, and the price is unknown (all the dozens of web pages just say "Contact" or "Quote", apparently because they want to sell you bulk quantities), but now that I know these low-air-flow anemometers exist, I'll see if I can find one.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 14:10
There are other models supporting 0-9999 CFM like this: ##digital-meters.com/products/HVAC-Thermo-Anemometer-%252d-CEM-DT%252d619.html

Ebay could also be an option.
Report Comment
 
 
# Not that hard...Olle P 2011-02-17 03:48
"How close do the fans have to be before the aggregate air flow drops?"
Assuming the fans are placed freely the answer is very simple to detect experimentally: Move them slowly closer until they start to increase their rotational speed. That's when the interaction between them is big enough to notice. (I've done this myself, and the distance do differ with the force and geometry of the fans.)
When mounted at the opposite sides of a heatsink one can easily assume a negligible amount of air to not pass through both fans. Especially if the heatsink, like in the V6, is a closed tunnel.

"How does the introduction of an obstruction affect this?"
It does reduce the airflow, in the case of high speed fans the reduction is substantial, as can be read from the pressure/flow curves supplied by the fan manufacturers.
The typical optimal work-span for most fans is at around half of the free flow, and then it's up to the user to pick a fan that have a span covering the desired flow and pressure applicable.
Report Comment
 
 
# Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 prototypeDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 14:17
Servando, the anemometer at the link you supplied (the CEM DT-619) specifically says that the lower bound it supports is 80CFM...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 prototypeServando Silva 2011-02-15 17:11
I'm sorry David but I fail to see that in the specifications table. It says it supports a minimum of 0 CFM and a maximum of 9999CFM. However I do see that it supports a minimum of 80 ft/min, which stands for speed, not volume (air-flow).
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 prototypeDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 17:16
You're right, my bad. I suppose to use this for fan testing, I'd have to construct some sort of tunnel so that all the air flow from the fan was focussed through the blades of the anemometer...
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter