Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Cooling arrow Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Heatsink
Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Heatsink E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Cooling
Written by David Ramsey   
Monday, 14 February 2011
Table of Contents: Page Index
Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Heatsink
Closer Look: Achilles Plus Prototype
Heatsink Test Methodology
Testing and Results
CPU Cooler Final Thoughts and Conclusion

Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Heatsink Prototype

One of the benefits of testing computer hardware is that you occasionally get to look at a new product before it's introduced to the market. In my time at Benchmark Reviews, I've been fortunate enough to be able to review computer cases and CPUs before they were generally available (or in some cases, before they were even announced). Recently Benchmark Reviews was given the opportunity to evaluate a prototype of Xigmatek's forthcoming Achilles Plus SD1484 CPU cooler, and I tested it to compare performance against a variety of air and water coolers.

While all-in-one water coolers have become more popular recently, their performance in most cases still can't compete with that of the best air coolers. Air cooling will remain the norm for most rigs, and as Intel and AMD transition to 32nm and smaller processes, the amount of heat their CPUs produce will go down, as we've seen with testing of Intel's Sandy Bridge processors, which even when heavily overclocked simply don't require the likes of a ProlimaTech Megahalems to keep them cool.

xigmatek_achilles_plus_sd1484_proto_bottom.jpg

The sample Benchmark Reviews received is, officially, a "Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 Prototype Sample". There was no retail box, fans, fan mounts, or even marketing specifications, so all we can do is show you pictures and report the performance we observed.

Manufacturer: Xigmatek
Product Name: Achilles Plus SD1484
Price: $39.95 MSRP

Full Disclosure: The product sample used in this article has been provided by Xigmatek.

Normally, we'd put the product's official specifications and features here, but we have none, so let's get on with the closer look and performance testing.



 

Comments 

 
# Faulty assumption.Olle P 2011-02-15 07:49
Two fans mounted in series will *not* move twice as much air as a single fan. (In free air they will move just a little more than a single fan.)
They will, however, be the equivalent of a *stronger* fan, able to build a higher pressure. That is good if the air flow is very constricted by dense fins or so, like in the case of the H70 cooler. It's a very noisy solution though.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 08:50
Let's try a though experiment: take two 90CFM fans as used on the V6 GT. Put them in series-- the output of one blowing towards the input of another-- but space the fans 6 feet apart. In this configuration the aggregate air flow of the fans is obviously 180CFM, although it's really two independent air streams.

The question is "How close do the fans have to be before the aggregate air flow drops?" A secondary question would be "How does the introduction of an obstruction affect this?"

Obviously a 90CFM fan isn't going to blow 90CFM through the tightly-packed fins of a typical cooler, but I don't know of a good way to measure this. Custom PC magazine did a fan test roundup some years back where they measured how long a given fan took to inflate a garbage bag of known volume, and that might be worth trying.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 09:20
Time to get a digital anemometer and test it. It sounds like a very interesting experiment.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 12:43
Yeah, well, the trouble with that is that commercial anemometers are designed to test air flow in HVAC systems, and generally have low-end CFM ranges of about 80CFM, which means they wouldn't be able to give readings on the majority of fans...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 13:03
Majority of the fans? I'd say most of the enthusiasts use fans below the 80CFM Spec. Fans included with heat-sinks or radiators normally stay between 30-80CFM range. Only when you're looking for an specific test or if you're overclocking a lot your components you'll go for a delta or any other 80+ CFM fan, because they sound like vacuums.

Also, for measuring performance, readings should be measured after passing the radiator/heatsink. So even if a 80CFM fan is mounted, I doubt you'll see 80 CFM after passing trough the heatsink, and will also depend a lot on static pressure for sure.

Anyway, I think there are a lot of fans to test in those conditions. The only problem I can think off, is that we should tap or make a tunnel after the heatsink/rad to make proper measurements, I suppose. Here's a simple, yet useful example at Xtreme Systems: ##youtube.com/watch?v=8AmF1Z0M8JY
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 13:16
Um, yeah. Isn't "majority" similar in meaning to "most of"?

If we're measuring a fan's output to see how well it corresponds to its advertised rating, we'd need to measure the fan in isolation. The performance with specific heat sinks might be interesting, but in that case we'd be testing the heat sink more than the fan...

The video was interesting, but with no explanation of what was being measured or how it was being measured, I didn't get any useful information from it. I assume the orange meter at the right was showing volts, and perhaps one of the three devices to the left was reading out CFM, but I don't really know.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 13:29
Yes, but really, most of the PC fans work above 80CFM?
Oh, It's my fault not to include a link to the specific thread. From left to right: anemometer, sound meter 1, sound meter 2 (on a cellphone, which I don't trust), Fan Voltage. I thought the video was clear enough to see the units, but maybe because I saw it at 1080p res.
I think we'd be testing both heatsink/radiator performance and fan performance.
Here's the link for complete info at XS: ##xtremesystems.org/forums/showthread.php?t=259802

Regards.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 13:40
It would be nice to know which anemometer he was using, since it can obviously handle low air flows...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 13:51
OK, now that I've re-read your phrase I need to apologize because I misread it. You actually meant low-end CFM ranges about 80 CFM, and I understood it the other way. Now all makes sense.

About the model, I could easily read it while watching the video. It's an AM-4836V. Google lead me here: #starmeter.en.made-in-china.com/product/gobQWtUjYLcu/China-Multi-Functions-Thermo-Anemometer-AM-4836V-.html
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 13:58
There doesn't seem to be any way to get one except to order it directly from China, and the price is unknown (all the dozens of web pages just say "Contact" or "Quote", apparently because they want to sell you bulk quantities), but now that I know these low-air-flow anemometers exist, I'll see if I can find one.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 HeatsinkServando Silva 2011-02-15 14:10
There are other models supporting 0-9999 CFM like this: ##digital-meters.com/products/HVAC-Thermo-Anemometer-%252d-CEM-DT%252d619.html

Ebay could also be an option.
Report Comment
 
 
# Not that hard...Olle P 2011-02-17 03:48
"How close do the fans have to be before the aggregate air flow drops?"
Assuming the fans are placed freely the answer is very simple to detect experimentally: Move them slowly closer until they start to increase their rotational speed. That's when the interaction between them is big enough to notice. (I've done this myself, and the distance do differ with the force and geometry of the fans.)
When mounted at the opposite sides of a heatsink one can easily assume a negligible amount of air to not pass through both fans. Especially if the heatsink, like in the V6, is a closed tunnel.

"How does the introduction of an obstruction affect this?"
It does reduce the airflow, in the case of high speed fans the reduction is substantial, as can be read from the pressure/flow curves supplied by the fan manufacturers.
The typical optimal work-span for most fans is at around half of the free flow, and then it's up to the user to pick a fan that have a span covering the desired flow and pressure applicable.
Report Comment
 
 
# Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 prototypeDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 14:17
Servando, the anemometer at the link you supplied (the CEM DT-619) specifically says that the lower bound it supports is 80CFM...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 prototypeServando Silva 2011-02-15 17:11
I'm sorry David but I fail to see that in the specifications table. It says it supports a minimum of 0 CFM and a maximum of 9999CFM. However I do see that it supports a minimum of 80 ft/min, which stands for speed, not volume (air-flow).
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Xigmatek Achilles Plus SD1484 prototypeDavid Ramsey 2011-02-15 17:16
You're right, my bad. I suppose to use this for fan testing, I'd have to construct some sort of tunnel so that all the air flow from the fan was focussed through the blades of the anemometer...
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter