Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Storage arrow Mushkin Callisto Deluxe Solid State Drive
Mushkin Callisto Deluxe Solid State Drive E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Storage
Written by Olin Coles   
Tuesday, 01 February 2011
Table of Contents: Page Index
Mushkin Callisto Deluxe Solid State Drive
Features and Specifications
Closer Look: Mushkin Callisto Deluxe
SandForce SF-1200 SSD Controller
SSD Testing Methodology
AS-SSD Benchmark
ATTO Disk Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 Tests
Iometer IOPS Performance
EVEREST Disk Benchmark
HDD vs Hybrid Drive vs SSD
Mushkin Callisto Deluxe Conclusion

CrystalDiskMark 3.0 Tests

CrystalDiskMark 3.0 is a file transfer and operational bandwidth benchmark tool from Crystal Dew World that offers performance transfer speed results using sequential, 512KB random, and 4KB random samples. For our test results chart below, the 4KB 32-Queue Depth read and write performance was measured using a 1000MB space. CrystalDiskMark requires that an active partition be set on the drive being tested, and all drives are formatted with NTFS on the Intel ICH10 controller set to AHCI-mode. Benchmark Reviews uses CrystalDiskMark to illustrate operational IOPS performance with multiple threads. In addition to our other tests, this benchmark allows us to determine operational bandwidth under heavy load.

Each of our tests of the Mushkin Callisto Deluxe SSD were consistent, but only the best test result speeds were charted below. Sequential tests on this Sandforce-driven SSD produced a maximum read speed of 197.4 MB/s, while the write speed was only 69.63 MB/s. The sequential file transfer speeds have traditionally been low with this benchmark tool for SandForce controllers, which is why we will concentrate on the operational IOPS performance for this section.

CrystalDiskMark 3.0 reported 512K results of 191.1 MB/s read and 68.83 MB/s write performance. 4K tests produced 16.92 read and 59.20 write performance. 4KB queue depth 32 IOPS is one area where SandForce-based SSDs truly excel, yet performance for the 60GB Mushkin Callisto Deluxe is less impressive than the other SandForce SSDs.

CDM-Muskin-Callisto-Deluxe-MKNSSDCL60GB-DX.png

Displayed in the chart below, the maximum 4KB queue depth 32 IOPS performance results for several enthusiast-level storage products illustrate which products offer the best operation under load:

CrystalDiskMark-4K_Results.png



 

Comments 

 
# RE: Muskin Callisto Deluxe Solid State DriveRobert17 2011-02-01 23:37
Well thanks again Olin. Nice review. The more SSDs you test, the more crowded the competition becomes to the advantage of the end user. All is well in the SSD-verse. (PS, forgot the site, but I did see a "sale" item on an SSD, 64Gb @ $84 last week. $$ Looking better all the time.)
Report Comment
 
 
# Waiting,.......RealNeil 2011-02-02 07:06
Good look at SSD's. Thanks for your time and effort putting this all together Olin. I'll refer back to this info when I'm ready to buy more of these drives. I'm still waiting for SSD Prices to come down a little more. I only have one of them, an OCZ Agility-2 that is seriously fast, but I can't afford to put one in the other computers yet.

Maybe SSD makers could learn a lesson from Amazon, whereby they lowered the prices of their Kindle Readers and then had the very best sales and profits that they have ever recorded in the last quarter of 2010.
Report Comment
 
 
# Garbage collection (of words)Ron 2011-02-02 16:58
I would re-check your facts about GC being as bad as defragging aN SSD drive. Yes, it will add some extra wear, but this would be nothing on the order of a full defrag. When these drives are used in a situation where TRIM is not available, then GC is the only solution available. I am very wary of their speeds when in a "dirty" state, and how a normal home desktop user would really be affected. I think cheap Slow long lasting SSD would be great(direct competitor to hard drive) simply for the Noise, power and space requirements. £/GB equality.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter