Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Motherboards arrow ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 Motherboard
ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 Motherboard E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Motherboards
Written by Olin Coles and David Ramsey   
Sunday, 02 January 2011
Table of Contents: Page Index
ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 Motherboard
The Intel P67 Express Chipset
Closer Look: ASUS P8P67
ASUS P8P67 Details
ASUS UEFI (BIOS)
ASUS P8P67 Overclocking
ASUS P8P67 1.0 Specifications
Motherboard Testing Methodology
AIDA64 Extreme Edition Tests
PCMark Vantage Tests
CINEBENCH R11.5 Benchmarks
CPU-Dependent 3D Gaming
PassMark PerformanceTest
Media Encoding Benchmarks
SPECviewperf 11 Tests
SPECapc Lightwave
ASUS P8P67 Conclusion

SPECapc Lightwave

SPECapc (Application Performance Characterization) tests are fundamentally different from the SPECviewperf tests. While SPECviewperf tests incorporate code from the various test programs directly into the benchmark, the SPECapc tests are separate scripts and datasets that are run against a stand-alone installation of the program being benchmarked. SPECapc group members sponsor applications and work with end-users, user groups, publications and ISVs to select and refine workloads, which consist of data sets and benchmark script files. Workloads are determined by end-users and ISVs, not SPECapc group members. These workloads will evolve over time in conjunction with end-users' needs and the increasing functionality of PCs and workstations.

For this test, I ran the SPECapc "Lightwave" benchmark against a trial installation of Newtek's Lightwave 3D product. The benchmark, developed in cooperation with NewTek, provides realistic workloads that simulate a typical LightWave 3D workflow. It contains 11 datasets ranging from 64,000 to 1.75 million polygons and representing such applications as 3D character animation, architectural review, and industrial design. Scores for individual workloads are composited under three categories: interactive, render and multitask.

The benchmark puts special emphasis on processes that benefit from multi-threaded computing, such as animation, OpenGL playback, deformations, and high-end rendering that includes ray tracing, radiosity, complex textures and volumetric lighting. The test reports three scores: Animation (multitasking), Animation (interactive), and Rendering. The numeric scores represent the time it took to complete each section of the benchmark, in seconds, so lower scores are better.

I've found the SPECapc Lightwave 3D test to be an excellent indicator of overclock stability. In many cases, overclocked systems that will make it through every other benchmark here will crash in this test.

SPECapc-Lightwave.png

Although this test stresses system components other than the processor (the video card's OpenGL implementation, for example), it still shows obvious performance differences in the CPUs. The AMD 1100T ekes out a couple of very narrow victories over the Core i7-950 in two of the three tests, but it can't compete with the 2600K.

In the Animation (Multitasking) section, we see a very nice performance scaling with frequency for the Intel processors, with results following clock speed almost perfectly. This pattern is repeated in the Animation (Interactive) and Rendering sections, although the differences are less notable. The 1100T's relatively poor showing here prove that six physical cores don't always beat four physical cores.



 

Comments 

 
# ProgrammerFieyr 2011-01-22 14:26
Just wanted to correct this article...it's not a "UEFI BIOS"

UEFI is the new standard. BIOS is the old standard. But there is no such thing as a UEFI BIOS.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: ProgrammerOlin Coles 2011-01-22 14:36
It's more of a semantics argument. I am aware that the term UEFI replaces the term BIOS, but try getting the average reader to understand that. I suppose I could always refer to it as UEFI (BIOS).
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: ProgrammerFieyr 2011-01-22 14:56
Or even say, UEFI (which is replacing BIOS as the new firmware standard).

But yeah, I understand where you're coming from. Hard to get people to just throw out the word BIOS after 20 something years.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: ProgrammerFieyr 2011-01-22 16:06
I did want to mention though, excellent article. This comparison chart is exactly what I was looking for!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: ProgrammerOlin Coles 2011-01-22 17:36
Thank you! And I've gone back into the articles and made some changes to better clarify UEFI vs BIOS. It will be gradual, but readers often need baby steps.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 MotherboardBrad 2011-01-24 11:17
Hi, one question:

Does the new TUF P67 Sabertooth mobo also have DIGI + VRM? Thanks!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 MotherboardOlin Coles 2011-01-24 11:19
Yes, all ASUS P67 motherboards feature DIGI + VRM.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 MotherboardBrad 2011-01-24 13:37
Oh wow... Great article for intro. Helped a lot!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 MotherboardBill Edwards 2011-01-31 07:28
Does the ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 Motherboard with the Sandy Bridge have an overheating problem on initial set up with Intel supplied cpu cooler?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 MotherboardOlin Coles 2011-01-31 08:39
I'm not aware of this problem, and our test systems didn't have anything similar.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: ASUS P8P67 LGA1155 MotherboardPet 2012-06-13 03:35
I have exactly this same Problem. MB says CPU is overheating and the temp is raising very fast according to the MB up to 97 degrees C. Not sure what is wrong yet, MB or CPU..
Report Comment
 
 
# asus p8p67 EVOCzyberX 2011-02-12 21:11
I ordered this motherboard and a i7 2006k processor last week and now I read somewhere that this peculiar motherboard has been recalled. I don't know if that's true, though I allready paid for both.
Is there realy something wrong with this motherboard?
When I go to amazon.com this item has simply vanished of the shelves and other asus motherboards aswell.
by the way, thanX for your asus review for this was what made me move to LGA1155! I still believe asus is damn GOOD!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: asus p8p67 EVOOlin Coles 2011-02-12 21:42
It's not THIS motherboard per se, it's a transistor flaw in the SATA-II 3.0GB/s controller of all current P67 and H67 chipsets that effects a very small number of products under certain conditions. Intel has said that the design issue is found in only 5% of the products.
Report Comment
 
 
# p67 and NetworkingDave W. 2011-02-20 12:19
Hello, First off great review on a great piece of tech =3. I have been using this for a few days and i couldn't be more impressed. However that being said i have a question. Is a network card required with the P67. I have been troubleshooting this for quite awhile and i cant find a solution -_-. Are there drivers to download? Am i making this too hard? I'm using a wired (cat6) internet connection. I honestly think its just windows goofing up but i would like to be certain. Thanks =)
Report Comment
 
 
# p67 and NetworkingDave W. 2011-02-20 12:21
to be perfectly clear. Having Internet issues, either the mobo or Windows doesn't even recognize the Ethernet Cable. need some advice...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: p67 and NetworkingOlin Coles 2011-02-20 12:27
Is a network card required? No, because it already comes with a network adapter. If you've got to ask if there are drivers, then perhaps it's time to get someone else to help you with your system. All hardware has drivers, but many of these items have drivers auto-installed from the built-in Windows driver library. For troubleshooting questions, visit: forum.benchmarkreviews.com
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: p67 and NetworkingDave W. 2011-02-20 12:30
Thanks for the speedy reply! I didn't think i needed one it seems the issue is more software than hard. Thanks again for the help! =)
Report Comment
 
 
# New terminolgyDave C 2011-02-20 17:20
Hey

Let me be the First (maybe) to offer a new abbreviated terminology for the new UEFI. Since BIOS rolls easily off the tongue, UEFI simply does NOT lend itself to such an abbreviated form...so I propose that we start calling it the "WEEF", simply taking the sound that the first 3 letters would make in any other usage. Calling it "WEEFI" (long i) would confuse it with WiFi, so shortening it to weef would make sense (to me anyhoo). Or if weefI catches on, so be it.
Report Comment
 
 
# yesCraig 2011-08-23 18:42
Now if they could produce a board where the usb works it would be great. Can't even get a USB flash/sd card reader to work correctly even in the usb 2 ports. Mulitple rteaders work on other systems but no on the p67 deluxe. mulitpl bios updates. multiplwe driver installs and on and on. still no card readers working.
what a loss
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: yesOlin Coles 2011-08-23 19:47
That sounds like a driver problem, not hardware. When you uninstall the item in device manager, are you checking the box to also remove driver files with it? That could be the problem.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: yesCraig 2011-08-24 00:38
drivers have been REMOVED and installed multiple times. have another computer with different asus board same drivers. works like a champ. with software costs etc we am sitting with a $5500 white elephant that was intended as a high intensity photographic work station. Imagine annually running 10-15 thousand photos through a work station where you can't use a card reader.
Oh there is a work around. You plug the compact flash card into the card reader first and then plug the card reader into the computer. Then when you are done with that card you unplug everytrhing. Plug a new compact flash card into the card reader and then plug the card reader into the computer. Works like a champ.
Kind of like buying a new stick shift car where you have to come to a standstill every time you want to shift gears.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: yesDavid Ramsey 2011-08-24 08:03
Have you tried other USB devices in the ports the card reader doesn't work with? Honestly, it's starting to sound like a problem with the card reader to me.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: yesCraig 2011-08-24 11:00
OK.
Two different card readers would work fine on two different computers on different multiple ports but none of them would work on the 6 usb ports that were tried on the bad computer. The units were also tired with different compact flash cards. By the way we are working with Lexar dual readers compact/sd one card reader is the older USB 2 and one is the newer USB 3 card reader.
The service rep has now disabled the raid c drives and has put an image of windows onto the solid state drive. The solid state drive is on the system to be used as the scratch memory for Adobe products.
With this temporary arrangement it looks like both the USB 2.0 and USB 3.0 ports perform correctly. We now are in the process of trying to repair windows using the repair feature on the windows disk. The system disk does not have service pack 1 but it may work anyway.
So now it looks like the problem can be blamed on some windows coruption.
If the repair doesn't work then the software will be deactivated and windows will be reinstalled.
By the way Lexar has said they have had some issues of card reader problems on both windows and mac computers but all seem to be unexplainable and random.
When this is done I will provide some info back to them.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: yesDavid Ramsey 2011-08-23 20:26
I haven't had any problem with the USB ports in mine. It's the basis of my Sandy Bridge Hackintosh now, and the rear USB ports work fine, and the card reader I have connected to the internal USB ports works fine, too...
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter