| PowerColor AX6950 PCS++ Video Card | |
| Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards | |
| Written by Bruce Normann | |
| Tuesday, 22 February 2011 | |
|
Page 1 of 20
PowerColor R6950 PCS++ Video Card
Manufacturer: PowerColor (TUL Corporation) Full Disclosure: The product sample used in this article has been provided by PowerColor. AMD's new Radeon HD 6900 series occupies the top position in their single-GPU product hierarchy. The two models, the HD 6950 and HD 6970 are very much like the HD 5850 and HD 5870 that they replace. The xx50 cards generally run at a lower clock rate and have a few sections of the GPU disabled, presumably because the vendor is trying to reclaim chips that have a small, isolated manufacturing defect. But what happens when your manufacturing process is so good that you're not producing enough "defective" chips to meet the market demand? When is a 6950 not a 6950? Well, quite often, as it turns out. In the case of the PowerColor PCS++ HD 6950 video card, it just depends on which way you flip the switch.
Overclocking has been a constant factor for PCs ever since Intel let the cat out of the bag with their E2180, and other members of the Conroe family. What was sort of an underground activity became mainstream overnight, with 50% overclocks almost guaranteed and 100% overclocks achievable by a great many enthusiasts, even with air cooling. Then AMD came along with their Phenom II CPUs and we got to try our luck at unlocking disabled cores. Now PowerColor has combined both methods into one video card, and they've made it as simple as flipping a switch. Push it one way and you have a standard Radeon HD 6950, with 1408 shaders running at 800 MHz. Push it the other way and you have 1536 shaders running at 880 MHz, which is the exact configuration of the HD 6970. The only difference is that PowerColor kept the PCS++ memory at 1250 MHz instead of spending the extra money for the 1500 MHz memory, like a real HD 6970 has. That's easy fix with a little overclocking, because PowerColor has done the hard work of loading a second BIOS that unlocks the extra 128 shader processors. This is a new feature for PowerColor and their PCS++ series. This segment of the product line has always been known for wringing the last drop of performance from whatever GPU and platform they used as a basis. But never before has a video card manufacturer been able to add shader cores at will, like this. It's a happy reflection on the maturity of AMD's 40nm design rules that they seem to have an endless supply of perfectly functional HD 6970 chips. Plus, stability has finally arrived in the manufacturing process, as performed by the world's largest semiconductor foundry operation, TSMC in Taiwan. You may have seen some benchmarks for Radeon HD 6950 video cards already, and an equal number for the HD 6970, but let's take a complete look at the novel PowerColor PCS++ HD 6950 2GB GDDR5, which is a bit of both. Then we'll run it through Benchmark Review's full test suite, where we're going to look at how this card performs with both factory BIOS options.
|
|





Comments
I got the XFX 6950, backed up original bios and modded it to unlock the extra shaders but leave voltages/speeds the same.
Overall I am very impressed, I thought that it more competes between the 570 & 580 than the 460 & 480, based off what Ive read. Haven't done enough tests yet. I really couldn't afford this card, but I broke down and got it because I love all the unlocking goodies. Over all very happy with this card.
*Just wanted to clarify.. You stated that Power-color put slower ram in it but shipped the boards with both a 6970 bios and 6950 bios?
1920x1200, 8GB D/C 1332mhz ddr3 999.24.34, PII x6 1055T disabled C&C/etc.
Unigine at x8 AA, x16 AF, Normal Tesselation: FPS:26.0 Scores:656 Min FPS:8.1 Max FPS:45.5 And.. w/ x4 AA: FPS:30.7 Scores:774 Min FPS: 7.3 Max FPS:59.9
Render:
direct3d11Mode:1920x1200 4-8xAA fullscreen
Shaders: high Textures:high Filter: trilinear Anisotropy:16x Occlusion: enabled Refraction:enabled Volumetric:enabled Tessellation:normal
cpuz validation:
#valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=1724586
gpuz validation:
##techpowerup.com/gpuz/7upme/
It appears that we are using different test settings. My test used DX11, Shader on High, Tessellation on Normal, 16x Anisotropy, and 4x AA at 1920x1200 fullscreen.
Hopefully this helps.
Thanks for this awesome review! Based on the information you gave, I decided to pull the trigger on this as an upgrade (current rig is an i7-920 @ 3.8 GHz, GTX 460 1GB, 12 GB VRAM, Vertex 2 120GB boot).
Newegg has this on sale for $255 with a MIR, which--given the BIOS switch--seems like the best bang for the buck right now.
Apparently I ordered the wrong one, the regular AX6950 2GB with a switch to simply OC the card to 880mhz, not unlock the shaders?
Has BMR contacted PowerColor over this? Why is such a new card deactivated so quickly?