Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow AMD Radeon HD 6850 Barts Video Card
AMD Radeon HD 6850 Barts Video Card E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Olin Coles   
Thursday, 21 October 2010
Table of Contents: Page Index
AMD Radeon HD 6850 Barts Video Card
Radeon HD 6850 Closer Look
Features and Specifications
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX10: 3DMark Vantage
DX10: Crysis Warhead
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Battlefield Bad Company 2
DX11: BattleForge
DX9 SSAO: Mafia II
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Unigine Heaven 2.1
Overclocking and Temperatures
VGA Power Consumption
Radeon HD 6850 Conclusion

DX10: 3DMark Vantage

3DMark Vantage is a PC benchmark suite designed to test the DirectX10 graphics card performance. FutureMark 3DMark Vantage is the latest addition the 3DMark benchmark series built by FutureMark corporation. Although 3DMark Vantage requires NVIDIA PhysX to be installed for program operation, only the CPU/Physics test relies on this technology.

3DMark Vantage offers benchmark tests focusing on GPU, CPU, and Physics performance. Benchmark Reviews uses the two GPU-specific tests for grading video card performance: Jane Nash and New Calico. These tests isolate graphical performance, and remove processor dependence from the benchmark results.

  • 3DMark Vantage v1.02
    • Extreme Settings: (Extreme Quality, 8x Multisample Anti-Aliasing, 16x Anisotropic Filtering, 1:2 Scale)

3DMark Vantage GPU Test: Jane Nash

Of the two GPU tests 3DMark Vantage offers, the Jane Nash performance benchmark is slightly less demanding. In a short video scene the special agent escapes a secret lair by water, nearly losing her shirt in the process. Benchmark Reviews tests this DirectX-10 scene at 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 resolutions, and uses Extreme quality settings with 8x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering. The 1:2 scale is utilized, and is the highest this test allows. By maximizing the processing levels of this test, the scene creates the highest level of graphical demand possible and sorts the strong from the weak.

3dMark_Vantage_Jane_Nash_Benchmark.jpg

Jane Nash Extreme Quality Settings

Cost Analysis: Jane Nash (1680x1050)

  • $142 Radeon HD 5770 1GB costs $7.89 per FPS
  • $167 GeForce GTX 460 768MB costs $7.36 per FPS
  • $180 Radeon HD 6850 1GB costs $7.69 per FPS
  • $188 Radeon HD 5830 1GB costs $7.97 per FPS
  • $220 GeForce GTX 460 1GB costs $9.09 per FPS
  • $240 Radeon HD 6870 1GB costs $8.08 per FPS
  • $260 EVGA GTX 460 FTW 1GB costs $8.18 per FPS
  • $262 Radeon HD 5850 1GB costs $9.00 per FPS
  • $292 GeForce GTX 470 1GB costs $9.97 per FPS

3DMark Vantage GPU Test: New Calico

New Calico is the second GPU test in the 3DMark Vantage test suite. Of the two GPU tests, New Calico is the most demanding. In a short video scene featuring a galactic battleground, there is a massive display of busy objects across the screen. Benchmark Reviews tests this DirectX-10 scene at 1680x1050 and 1920x1200 resolutions, and uses Extreme quality settings with 8x anti-aliasing and 16x anisotropic filtering. The 1:2 scale is utilized, and is the highest this test allows. Using the highest graphics processing level available allows our test products to separate themselves and stand out (if possible).

3dMark_Vantage_New_Calico_Benchmark.jpg

New Calico Extreme Quality Settings

Cost Analysis: New Calico (1680x1050)

  • $142 Radeon HD 5770 1GB costs $10.44 per FPS
  • $167 GeForce GTX 460 768MB costs $8.70 per FPS
  • $180 Radeon HD 6850 1GB costs $10.11 per FPS
  • $188 Radeon HD 5830 1GB costs $10.74 per FPS
  • $220 GeForce GTX 460 1GB costs $10.63 per FPS
  • $240 Radeon HD 6870 1GB costs $10.76 per FPS
  • $260 EVGA GTX 460 FTW 1GB costs $9.42 per FPS
  • $262 Radeon HD 5850 1GB costs $12.13 per FPS
  • $292 GeForce GTX 470 1GB costs $11.59 per FPS

Test Summary: Based on the 3dMark Vantage Jane Nash and Calico performance tests, it appears the Radeon HD 6850 competes directly against the Radeon HD 5830 and 768MB GeForce GTX 460. As far as price to performance value, the Radeon HD 6850 beats the Radeon HD 5830 but fails to match value with a 768MB GeForce GTX 460. At 1680x1050 resolution with extreme quality settings, the Radeon HD 5770 produced 18.0 FPS in Jane Nash compared to 23.6 FPS with the Radeon HD 5830, while the Radeon HD 6850 produced 23.4 FPS. In New Calico the Radeon HD 5770 produced 13.6 FPS compared to 17.5 FPS with the Radeon HD 5830, while the Radeon HD 6850 produced 17.8 FPS. Compared with a similarly priced EVGA GeForce GTX 460 FTW video card ($260), there's a substantial performance lead over the Radeon HD 6850, as well as the Radeon HD 6870. Unfortunately for Radeon fans, 3dMark Vantage doesn't make a strong argument in favor of the Radeon HD 6850 based on these results.

Graphics Card Radeon 5770 Radeon 5830 GeForce GTX460 Radeon 6850 GeForce GTX460 Radeon HD6870 EVGA GTX460 FTW Radeon HD5850
GPU Cores 800 1120 336 960 336 1120 336 1440
Core Clock (MHz) 850 800 675 775 675 900 850 725
Shader Clock (MHz) N/A N/A 1350 N/A 1350 N/A 1700 N/A
Memory Clock (MHz) 1200 1000 900 1000 900 1050 1000 1000
Memory Amount 1GB GDDR5 1GB GDDR5 768MB GDDR5 1GB GDDR5 1GB GDDR5 1GB GDDR5 1GB GDDR5 1GB GDDR5
Memory Interface 128-bit 256-bit 192-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit 256-bit



 

Comments 

 
# Why 7.25 on the value?sweatshopking 2010-10-22 03:50
this card produces frames at a lower cost than anything else you tested, based on your own scores. Why do you rate it a 7.25 on the value front?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Why 7.25 on the value?Olin Coles 2010-10-22 07:04
True, the cost per frame value was quite nice, but there were several factors I considered for the value rating and you've got to keep in mind that it's a subjective score. I didn't like that fan noise was slightly louder than the 6870, and the price seemed just a little higher than I think it should be. Again, it's only my rating, and you can ignore it if you feel differently about the cards' price.
Report Comment
 
 
# Mr.Mete Can Karahasan 2010-10-23 16:59
At 16x10 resolution, Hd 6850 is actually producing 56.1 fps in the BF2:BC benchmark, better than gtx 460. A typo there, my guess.
Report Comment
 
 
# Typo fixedOlin Coles 2010-10-23 17:33
Fixed! Thank you for pointing that out.
Report Comment
 
 
# 5830David 2010-10-25 06:30
well I wish I'd read this before I bought a 5830. not really sure where the 5830 would have placed in this test, but I assume it would be just below the 6850. my options at the site I purchased it were 5770 $139, 5830 $179, or 6850 $199. my motherboard doesn't have pcie 2.1 on 2.0 but I'm not sure if that would influence my choices.
Report Comment
 
 
# typoDavid 2010-10-25 06:31
2.1 on 2.0 should read 2.1 only 2.0
Report Comment
 
 
# 5830 wasn't greatsweatshopking 2010-10-25 07:02
the 5830 would come in quite a bit below the 6850, and with much higher tdp, and noise. It was a lackluster part, and that was one of the reasons for the refresh. that being said, it's still better than my 4850, so enjoy it!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: 5830Olin Coles 2010-10-25 07:14
I've actually got several results tested on the 5830, but didn't include them because this model is being phased out. I'll update the article with what I've got.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: 5830David 2010-10-25 08:05
so my next question is how will my system likely perform. I'm upgrading from a 8800GT OC to a 6850 reference card on a P43 ICH10 MB a E8400 cpu with 4GB of Dual Channel DDR2 1066 Ram and a 3gbs Sata HD, onto a 1680 x 1050 22" LCD via DVI
Report Comment
 
 
# finesweatshopking 2010-10-25 08:51
should be able to play pretty much anything on high, at that resolution.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: 5830Olin Coles 2010-10-25 10:23
At that resolution, it should nearly match the 1680x1050 results I produced in this review.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: 5830David 2010-10-25 10:46
Thanks :D thats great news!
Report Comment
 
 
# rmaDavid 2010-10-25 07:35
called NE they informed me that the order shipped but i can refuse delivery or rma the whole box unopened for a full refund. so I reordered everything with a 6850 :D
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: rmaOlin Coles 2010-10-25 07:37
That's good news. I've updated the test summary sections with 5830 performance results.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: rmaDavid 2010-10-25 07:45
thanks, looks like it's $20 well spent to go from the 5830 to the 6850. besides the FPS increase, I will also get a overall better quality controlled product with a couple of extras that I probably won't use LOL.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: rmaDavid 2010-10-25 07:49
hmm well did have to give up a free copy of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. sigh. I doubt I would of played it much though
Report Comment
 
 
# Updated performance chartsOlin Coles 2010-10-25 16:23
You'll all be pleased to know that I've updated this article with new performance charts that compare the Radeon HD 5830 and 5770.
Report Comment
 
 
# EVGApero 2010-11-12 23:09
How can the EVGA GTX460 be so much better than a normal one?
Report Comment
 
 
# Massive OverclockBruceBruce 2010-11-12 23:34
It's overclocked by the factory from 675 MHz to 850 MHz, giving it a pretty substantial (25% +) kick compared to stock cards.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Massive Overclockpero 2010-11-13 14:39
Is it physically different too? If a consumer overclocked a non-overclocked GTX460, would the results be the same?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Massive OverclockOlin Coles 2010-11-13 15:49
Nope, it's just been overclocked. The results would be the same for any GTX 460 overclocked to those speeds.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: EVGAOlin Coles 2010-11-13 08:49
Please see the Test Methodology section for specifications, but the reason it's better is because of a strong factory overclock.
Report Comment
 
 
# Will it work with my mobo?Ethan 2011-11-24 20:22
Hi. My motherboard has a pci 2.0 slot, not 2.1. will this card work?

Im currently running an amd msi r5770 hawk.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: AMD Radeon HD 6850 Barts Video CardEthan 2011-11-24 20:29
also, how much power does it need to run crossfire?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: AMD Radeon HD 6850 Barts Video CardOlin Coles 2011-11-24 21:06
It will work just fine with PCI-E 2.0, and since each card uses 140W expect to use 280W in CrossFire.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: AMD Radeon HD 6850 Barts Video CardEthan 2011-11-24 23:28
I have a 750 watt power supply. A 1 terrabite segate 7200 rpm hdd 8 gigs of ddr3 1333 Corsair Dominator ram, and an x fi titanium sound card. do you think that there would be enough power to run cf or should i check and see how much power each thing takes individually?

Thank you very much for the response
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: AMD Radeon HD 6850 Barts Video CardOlin Coles 2011-11-25 08:34
Your 750W PSU will be more than enough for CrossFire on that system.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter