Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Cooling arrow SilverStone SST-AP181 Air Penetrator Fan

SilverStone SST-AP181 Air Penetrator Fan E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Cooling
Written by David Ramsey   
Sunday, 08 August 2010
Table of Contents: Page Index
SilverStone SST-AP181 Air Penetrator Fan
Closer Look: SilverStone SST-AP181 Fan
Air Penetrator Detailed Features
Air Penetrator Fan Installation
Fan Testing and Results
Who needs a CPU fan?
Final Thoughts and Conclusion

Fan Testing and Results

The system I used for testing is the same one I built into the FT02 case originally, which I described in my SilverStone FT02 Computer Case review. It comprises an ASUS P6T V2 Deluxe motherboard, 12G of Corsair Dominator memory, two NVIDIA GTX480 video cards, and an Intel Core i7 980X processor.

I used Everest Ultimate version 5.5 to load the processor with the "Stress CPU" and "Stress FPU" tests. The results are presented as "thermal difference": the difference between the processor temperature and the ambient temperature. For these tests the Intel Core i7 980x processor was overclocked to 4.1GHz with a 160MHz BCLK and 1.35 volts.

silverstone_sst_ft02s_w_cpuid.jpg

The CPU cooler used was a dual-fan Cooler Master V6GT. And here are the results:

silverstone_sst-ap181_fan_v6gt.png

SilverStone claims that the AP181 fans set to "low" provide the same performance as the original case fans set to "High". This certainly seems to be true: in fact, the AP181's on low provide slightly better performance than the FT02 fans on high. The difference between the stock fans on low and the AP181 fans on high is 3.7 degrees.

Now let's look at the NVIDIA GTX480 temperatures with the video card fans set to "auto". I took idle and load temperature measurements (using Furmark 1.8.2 Multi GPU version to load the cards) with the case fans set to both low and high speeds.

silverstone_sst-ap181_fan_gtx480_auto.png

Here we see much less difference between the FT02 fans and the AP181 fans. The AP181 wins by a degree or so at idle with low fan speed, but actually falls behind slightly at idle with high fan speed. When the cards are loaded with Furmark, the temperatures with the AP181 fans are actually higher than the temperatures with the FT02 fans. Let's try the test again with the GTX480 fans set to 100%, as they might be in an overclocking or benchmarking scenario.

silverstone_sst-ap181_fan_gtx480_full.png

Here, the AP181 fans provide a much better performance: the GTX480 load temperatures are 0.9 to 5.9 degrees cooler with the case fans set to "low", and 3.9 to 4.9 degrees lower when the case fans are set to "high".

But then I had a crazy thought...



 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Attached Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter