Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Storage arrow G.Skill Phoenix Pro SandForce SSD
G.Skill Phoenix Pro SandForce SSD E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Storage
Written by Olin Coles   
Sunday, 04 July 2010
Table of Contents: Page Index
G.Skill Phoenix Pro SandForce SSD
Features and Specifications
Closer Look: G.Skill Phoenix Pro
SandForce SF-1200 SSD Controller
SSD Testing Methodology
AS-SSD Benchmark
ATTO Disk Benchmark
CrystalDiskMark 3.0 Tests
Iometer IOPS Performance
EVEREST Disk Benchmark
HDD vs Hybrid Drive vs SSD
G.Skill Phoenix Pro Conclusion

Iometer IOPS Performance

Iometer is an I/O subsystem measurement and characterization tool for single and clustered systems. Iometer does for a computer's I/O subsystem what a dynamometer does for an engine: it measures performance under a controlled load. Iometer was originally developed by the Intel Corporation and formerly known as "Galileo". Intel has discontinued work on Iometer, and has gifted it to the Open Source Development Lab (OSDL).

Iometer is both a workload generator (that is, it performs I/O operations in order to stress the system) and a measurement tool (that is, it examines and records the performance of its I/O operations and their impact on the system). It can be configured to emulate the disk or network I/O load of any program or benchmark, or can be used to generate entirely synthetic I/O loads. It can generate and measure loads on single or multiple (networked) systems.

To measure random I/O response time as well as total I/O's per second, Iometer is set to use 4KB file size chunks over a 100% random sequential distribution at a queue depth of 32 outstanding I/O's per target. The tests are given a 50% read and 50% write distribution. While this pattern may not match traditional 'server' or 'workstation' profiles, it illustrates a single point of reference relative to our product field.

The chart below illustrates combined random read and write IOPS over a 120-second Iometer test phase, where highest I/O total is preferred:

Iometer_Random_4K-IOPS_30QD_Results.png

From the onset, SandForce SSDs clearly outperform the competition when tested which a larger queue depth. While G.Skill's product website displays an image of their Iometer results reaching nearly 50,118 IOPS, there's no telling what settings were used for this test. In our own Iometer tests, which use 32 outstanding I/O's per target and a random 50/50 read/write distribution, only the 'unrestricted' SandForce SSDs approach 50,000 IOPS. These SSDs demonstrate a much higher performance level due to the custom firmware they've implemented, whereas the others each use 'locked' standard-release SandForce firmware that offers consistently identical results. Benchmark Reviews discusses this topic in more detail in our SandForce SF-1200 SSD Firmware Comparison article.

Drive Hardware

In our next section, we test linear read and write bandwidth performance and compare its speed against several other top storage products using EVEREST Disk Benchmark. Benchmark Reviews feels that linear tests are excellent for rating SSDs, however HDDs are put at a disadvantage with these tests whenever capacity is high.



 

Comments 

 
# RE: G.Skill Phoenix Pro SandForce SSDtuleggi 2010-07-06 23:17
Hello, I have noticed that in the "Iometer IOPS Performance" you already have the performance of the Vertex 2 in the graphics, I guess this is a preview? ;-)

Also if it is not asking too much could you also test in parallel the Vertex LE (Limited Edition)?
This because there are many confusion around the web and although they seems to perform similar (Vertex 2 and Vertex LE), it would be nice for the customer to understand which one of these two is the fastest!
I trust Benchmarkreviews!!
thanks!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: G.Skill Phoenix Pro SandForce SSDOlin Coles 2010-07-07 05:46
The Vertex-2 review is coming in the next few days; I just happened to be making charts and already had the results for this test. The Vertex LE will not be tested at this time because we do not have a sample. I assure you though, nobody could ever tell the difference in performance without a synthetic benchmark.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter