Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Cooling arrow Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010
Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010 E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Cooling
Written by Olin Coles - Testing by David Ramsey   
Tuesday, 27 July 2010
Table of Contents: Page Index
Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010
Thermally Conductive Element Reference
Cooler Master V6 GT Heatsink
ProlimaTech Super Mega Heatsink
Scythe Yasya SCYS-1000 Cooler
SilenX Effizio EFZ-120HA4
Thermalright Venomous-X RT Cooler
Zaward Vapor-120 ZCJ013 Cooler
CPU-Cooler Preparations
Heatsink Test Methodology
Heatsink Performance: Stock Cooling Fan
Heatsink Performance: High-Output Fan
CPU Cooler Final Thoughts
Best CPU Cooler Conclusion

Thermally Conductive Elements

Manufacturers have made a small fortune off of confusion tactics and misinformation. Marketing departments often times neglect to refer back to solid science when making their bold claims, which is why we have assembled a complete list of thermally conductive elements in the reference chart below.

It's very well known that Silver, Copper, Gold, and Aluminum together comprise the top four most thermally conductive elements. However, without knowing the thermal conductance of these elements you might be fooled into thinking the performance was close. As it turns out, Silver and Copper both offer nearly twice the performance of Aluminum when transferring thermal energy such as heat. The reason Aluminum is used in so many applications is because it's the least expensive top-tier metal available. Most Thermal Interface Material and CPU coolers use several different elemental ingredients to work together, but after a careful inspection of the performance levels it comes as a surprise to me that some of the most popular products make use of such poor conductive elements.

Thermal Conductance Element Name Symbol
4.29 W/cmK Silver Ag
4.01 W/cmK Copper Cu
3.17 W/cmK Gold Au
2.37 W/cmK Aluminum Al
2.01 W/cmK Calcium Ca
2.01 W/cmK Beryllium Be
1.74 W/cmK Tungsten W
1.56 W/cmK Magnesium Mg
1.5 W/cmK Rhodium Rh
1.48 W/cmK Silicon Si
1.47 W/cmK Iridium Ir
1.41 W/cmK Sodium Na
1.38 W/cmK Molybdenum Mo
1.29 W/cmK Carbon C
1.17 W/cmK Ruthenium Ru
1.16 W/cmK Zinc Zn
1.024 W/cmK Potassium K
1 W/cmK Cobalt Co
0.968 W/cmK Cadmium Cd
0.937 W/cmK Chromium Cr
0.907 W/cmK Nickel Ni
0.876 W/cmK Osmium Os
0.847 W/cmK Lithium Li
0.816 W/cmK Indium In
0.802 W/cmK Iron Fe
0.718 W/cmK Palladium Pd
0.716 W/cmK Platinum Pt
0.666 W/cmK Tin Sn
0.599 W/cmK Germanium Ge
0.582 W/cmK Rubidium Rb
0.58 W/cmK Dubnium Db
0.575 W/cmK Tantalum Ta
0.54 W/cmK Thorium Th
0.537 W/cmK Niobium Nb
0.506 W/cmK Technetium Tc
0.502 W/cmK Arsenic As
0.479 W/cmK Rhenium Re
0.47 W/cmK Protactinium Pa
0.461 W/cmK Thallium Tl
0.406 W/cmK Gallium Ga
0.359 W/cmK Cesium Cs
0.353 W/cmK Lead Pb
0.353 W/cmK Strontium Sr
0.349 W/cmK Ytterbium Yb
0.307 W/cmK Vanadium V
0.276 W/cmK Uranium U
0.274 W/cmK Boron B
0.243 W/cmK Antimony Sb
0.23 W/cmK Hafnium Hf
0.23 W/cmK Rutherfordium Rf
0.227 W/cmK Zirconium Zr
0.219 W/cmK Titanium Ti
Thermal Conductance Element Name Symbol
0.2 W/cmK Polonium Po
0.186 W/cmK Radium Ra
0.184 W/cmK Barium Ba
0.179 W/cmK Promethium Pm
0.172 W/cmK Yttrium Y
0.168 W/cmK Thulium Tm
0.165 W/cmK Neodymium Nd
0.164 W/cmK Lutetium Lu
0.162 W/cmK Holmium Ho
0.158 W/cmK Scandium Sc
0.15 W/cmK Francium Fr
0.143 W/cmK Erbium Er
0.139 W/cmK Europium Eu
0.135 W/cmK Lanthanum La
0.133 W/cmK Samarium Sm
0.125 W/cmK Praseodymium Pr
0.12 W/cmK Actinium Ac
0.114 W/cmK Cerium Ce
0.111 W/cmK Terbium Tb
0.107 W/cmK Dysprosium Dy
0.106 W/cmK Gadolinium Gd
0.1 W/cmK Lawrencium Lr
0.1 W/cmK Einsteinium Es
0.1 W/cmK Berkelium Bk
0.1 W/cmK Californium Cf
0.1 W/cmK Fermium Fm
0.1 W/cmK Curium Cm
0.1 W/cmK Nobelium No
0.1 W/cmK Americium Am
0.1 W/cmK Mendelevium Md
0.0834 W/cmK Mercury Hg
0.0787 W/cmK Bismuth Bi
0.0782 W/cmK Manganese Mn
0.0674 W/cmK Plutonium Pu
0.063 W/cmK Neptunium Np
0.0235 W/cmK Tellurium Te
0.0204 W/cmK Selenium Se
0.017 W/cmK Astatine At
0.00449 W/cmK Iodine I
0.00269 W/cmK Sulfur S
0.00235 W/cmK Phosphorus P
0.001815 W/cmK Hydrogen H
0.00152 W/cmK Helium He
0.00122 W/cmK Bromine Br
0.000493 W/cmK Neon Ne
0.000279 W/cmK Fluorine F
0.0002674 W/cmK Oxygen O
0.0002598 W/cmK Nitrogen N
0.0001772 W/cmK Argon Ar
0.0000949 W/cmK Krypton Kr
0.000089 W/cmK Chlorine Cl
0.0000569 W/cmK Xenon Xe

Recipes usually call for only the finest ingredients, and the very same principle is true for overclocker and hardware enthusiast products. Thermal pastes are often times mixed from at least a dozen different components, while heatsink coolers may use only one or two different metals. Armed with the knowledge above, you might expect any silver-based product to be a clear-cut winner... but building a superior product by design is different than what you receive in execution. Production and material costs usually dictate how the product is designed and fabricated.

Keep these materials in mind as we take a look at the new products Benchmark Reviews has collected for this round-up article, beginning with our first contender...



 

Comments 

 
# FanGyta 2010-07-27 17:45
I´m puzzled about V6 GT heatsink,what caused the loss in performance? Could it be the fan has less CFM?? Or it is the static air pressure?? or another thing that i cannot think?
Aside from that great test, as good as always, and still help me emphasizing that i did a good thing buying scythe mugen 2.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: FanOlin Coles 2010-07-27 19:19
There's no doubt that the Mugen 2 was a good investment... it's a great cooler for very little money. The V6 GT has two high-output fans on it to begin with, configured in a push/push set, so it's understandable to see performance decrease with one higher-output fan.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: FanDavid Ramsey 2010-07-27 19:21
It's simple: the Cooler Master V6 GT's stock fans provide a lot more airflow than the single Yate Loon fan. Base on the fan specifications, airflow drops by about 50% in this case, so the cooler's performance suffers. The V6GT represents a design trend in coolers that provides good performance with a relatively small heatsink by simply pushing a lot of air through it. You'll probably see more of this, since plastic and fans are cheaper than copper and aluminum.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: FanOlin Coles 2010-07-27 20:00
Either lots of plastic and fans, or pretty copper fringes to make you feel better about the premium price.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: FanServando Silva 2010-07-27 21:17
Don't forget to paint it black to get extra premium performance...
Report Comment
 
 
# Vertical motherboard test?Testy01 2010-07-27 20:03
It appears these coolers are designed for horizontal motherboards as heat rises. Surely using a system in this orientation with aftermarket or supplied fans will give a better outcome.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Vertical motherboard test?Olin Coles 2010-07-27 21:31
Vertical motherboard means that it stands upright, as in the case of most all mid-tower enclosures.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010halfwaythere 2010-07-27 20:58
The V6 simply doesn't have what it takes to be a top notch product. Its too small and the build quality is not very good. The problem is if you turn the stock fans down performance figures will drop pretty quick.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010David Ramsey 2010-07-28 06:59
Sure it does. The build quality on the sample I tested was excellent-- flat, well-finished base; perfectly ven fins, and nice little details like the rubber anti-vibration pads on the snap-on shrouds that hold the fans. The stock V6 fans are PWM controlled, so let your motherboard decide how fast they should be run, and you'll get a very good combination of balance and noise. The performance with the stock fans is excellent, too. My only complaint about the cooler is its high price.
Report Comment
 
 
# ?Daniel Mayes 2010-07-28 07:02
How come the Titan Fenrir was in instead of the Thermaltake Frio? The Thermaltake Frio did better than the ProlimaTech Megahalems in stock fan test and a little worse than the Mugen 2 with the Yate Loon D12SH-12. Are you using one or two Yate Loon D12SH-12? I'm sure I'm not the only that would like to see temperatures with both one and two high-output fans on there.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: ?Olin Coles 2010-07-28 07:05
Usually it's because of time contraints. If we had unlimited time, every single heatsink ever made would be tested for each article... but that's just not the case. We've already reviewed the Frio in our cooling section, so take a look there: benchmarkreviews.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=519&Itemid=62
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: ?Daniel Mayes 2010-07-29 07:10
It would be awesome to see pictures of the heatsinks in the computer setup in the future, I tried my thermaltake frio with the air blowing up but it blocked the first 2 ram slots, so I had to turn it where it blows outside the case since the computer would be faster in dual channel mode than single channel mode
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010Ladyfox 2010-07-28 11:41
Are there any plans to do a similar review, maybe smaller in scale, for those coolers that use 92mm fans instead? Reason I ask is that some mATX cases like the NZXT Vulcan have clearance issues with a good many 120mm systems even with the added room of special side panels. Consider as well that many have even released revised designs that will work on LGA-1156 and LGA1366 sockets including those from AMD with a sample list here:

ARCTIC COOLING Freezer 7 Pro Rev.2
COOLER MASTER Hyper N 520
Cooler Master Hyper TX3
Noctua NH-U9B SE2
Scythe "NINJA MINI Rev.B"

Granted, there are individual reviews for some of these out there but let's face it they're not you guys. ^_^
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010Olin Coles 2010-07-29 07:13
I have wanted a writer to take on the 92mm segment for over a year now. Apparently the threat of constant work with unreasonably tight tolerances has dissuaded everyone on staff. That and it's boring beyond belief. Still, I have my hopes.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Best CPU Cooler Performance Q2-2010Padge 2010-08-13 15:47
I would love to see a system for rating the mounting hardware on each review. There are a couple heatsinks I'm really liking but the hardware uses pushpins (Cogage True Spirit) or is a mini erector set (Mugen 2). I really think a Cogage True Spirit with ProLimatechs brackets would be the best.
Report Comment
 
 
# Can we get CPU Perf for LOW PROFILE Collers?OneEyedPony 2010-09-10 11:35
These big brick sized CPU coolers are great for the monster and mid towers, BUT...

I deal in building small cased PCs for people. I would like to see recommendations for CPU coolers in the 50-100mm height range.
Report Comment
 
 
# Low profile?RealNeil 2010-09-28 05:23
Corsair H50,.....Asetek LCLC (they actually make the H50 for corsair) and the ECO A.L.C. ECO-R120 CPU Cooler. All are water cooling solutions and all are relatively low profile.
I have two of the Asetek LCLC's (stands for: Low Cost Liquid Cooling) here and they work really well. I added extra fans to both of mine for a push/pull effect. I also have a Scythe Big Shuriken SCBSK-1000 120mm CPU Cooler on a Linux box and it's a very low profile cooler.
Report Comment
 
 
# HS MaterialsAthlonite 2010-12-22 18:29
"Because of their density, metals are the best conductors of thermal energy"

Actually that's wrong the best material is Diamond but an HS made of diamond would cost and absolute fortune.... you should have said best Perfomance/cost material is metal of which the best is Gold (best $$$$/Performance = Copper)for now atleast until they make Carbon nano tube materials more readily available
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter