|Biostar TA890GXB-HD mATX AMD Motherboard|
|Reviews - Featured Reviews: Motherboards|
|Written by Hank Tolman|
|Monday, 31 May 2010|
Page 9 of 15
Everest Benchmark Results
Lavalys EVEREST is an industry leading system diagnostics and benchmarking solution for enthusiasts PC users, based on the award-winning EVEREST Technology. During system optimizations and tweaking it provides essential system and overclock information, advanced hardware monitoring and diagnostics capabilities to check the effects of the applied settings. CPU, GPU and memory benchmarks are available to measure the actual system performance and compare it to previous states or other systems. Furthermore, complete software, operating system and security information makes EVEREST Ultimate Edition a comprehensive system diagnostics tool that offers a total of 100 pages of information about your PC.
Both the Queen and the PhotoWorxx tests rely on basic x86 instructions, and consume very low system memory while also being aware of HyperThreading, multi-processors, and multi-core processors. While the EVEREST CPU tests really only compare the processor performance more than it measures platforms, it still offers a glimpse into what kind of power each platform possesses.
Queen and Photoworxx tests are synthetic benchmarks that operate the function many times over and over-exaggerate by several magnitudes what the real-world performance would be like. The Queen benchmark focuses on the branch prediction capabilities and misprediction penalties of the CPU. It does this by finding possible solutions to the classic queen problem on a chessboard. At the same clock speed theoretically the processor with the shorter pipeline and smaller misprediction penalties will attain higher benchmark scores.
The ASUS M4A785TD-M EVO registers a less than 1% gain over the Biostar TA890GXB-HD. This pretty well shows us that the two chipsets are equal when it comes to the Queen benchmark. With so little changing between the two chipsets, this really comes as no surprise. Most of the upgrades coming with the 890GX chipset are found in the southbridge, which doesn't affect the Queen benchmarks.
Like the Queen benchmark, the Photoworxx tests for penalties against pipeline architecture. The synthetic Photoworxx benchmark stresses the integer arithmetic and multiplication execution units of the CPU and also the memory subsystem. Due to the fact that this test performs high memory read/write traffic, it cannot effectively scale in situations where more than two processing threads are used. The EVEREST Photoworxx benchmark performs the following tasks on a very large RGB image:
The Photoworxx benchmark tests offer a different perspective, and one that is a little more in line with what we saw in the PCMark Vantage tests. The Biostar TA890GXB-HD lags behind the ASUS motherboard by about 18%. That is a big difference considering the only piece of hardware that is differing between the two systems is the motherboard. It is very disappointing that the TA890GXB-HD, equipped with the newer chipset, is being handily outperformed by the older 785G motherboard.
The Zip Library test measures combined CPU and memory subsystem performance through the public ZLib compression library. ZLib is designed as a free lossless data compression library for use on virtually any computer hardware and operating system. The ZLib data format is itself portable across platforms and has a footprint independent of input data that can be reduced at some cost in compression. The AES integer benchmark measures CPU performance using AES data encryption. It utilizes Vincent Rijmen, Antoon Bosselaers and Paulo Barreto's public domain C code in ECB mode and consumes 48 MB of memory.
In the Zlib and AES compression tests we go back to the results we saw from the Queen tests. Both tests fall within the 1% margin of error region and really go to show that there isn't much difference at all between the two chipsets. Without taking advantage of the new options on the southbridge, relatively equal tests are just what we would expect to see.
The Julia and Mandel tests focus on measuring the single precision FP performance through the Julia fractal. The code behind this is written in Assembly, so it's incredibly optimized for both Intel and AMD processors. Julia focuses on 32 bit precision while Mandel focuses on 64 bit. SinJulia is a modified version of Julia which measures in 80 bit.
The final Everest tests again give us a good idea that the two northbridge chipsets are about as close to equal as we can get. Using the same processor, there is really no difference in the floating point precision between the two motherboards.