Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Motherboards arrow Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 Motherboard
Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 Motherboard E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Motherboards
Written by Olin Coles   
Thursday, 25 February 2010
Table of Contents: Page Index
Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 Motherboard
Intel Core i7: Platform
Intel X58-Express Platform
Gigabyte X58A Features
GA-X58A-UD7 Specifications
eXtreme Hard Drive (X.H.D)
Gigabyte X58A-UD7 Components
BIOS and Overclocking
Motherboard Testing Methodology
EVEREST CPU Benchmarks
Maxon CINEBENCH Results
PCMark Vantage Test Results
HD-Tune Pro Benchmarks
Far Cry 2 Benchmark
Power Consumption Results
Tylersburg Refresh Final Thoughts
Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 Conclusion

HD-Tune Pro Benchmarks

HD-Tune Pro is a benchmark designed for testing many different aspects of a storage device. In this article, Benchmark Reviews tests the Crucial RealSSD-C300 SATA 6Gb/s Solid State Drive and Crucial M225 CT128M225 SATA-3Gbps SSD on four different storage controllers. The Gigabyte EX58-UD4P utilizes the Intel ICH10R storage controller, and operates as our point of reference for the others. Gigabyte's X58A-UD7 includes the Marvell SE9128 SATA 6Gb/s controller, while ASUS adds the Marvell SE9123 SATA-6G controller chip to their product. Tested on the Gigabyte EX58-UD4P, the PCI-Express 2.0-based HighPoint Rocket 620LF SATA 6Gb/s controller card also utilizes the Marvell SE9128 controller.

Our test results were obtained after each SSD had been prepared using the DISKPART program with the "clean all" command. Because performance will degrade after write-to operations, even in the presence of Garbage Collection and TRIM support, Benchmark Reviews utilized read-from tests for our performance benchmarks. Intensive read and write benchmark testing is appropriate for our Storage Device Reviews, but for this article the purpose is to illustrate top-end performance.

HD-Tune_Read_Speed_X58.png

Since the Marvell SE91xx series of third-generation SATA controllers is still rather new to market, firmware and driver updates occur almost weekly. Benchmark Reviews originally tested each of these storage controllers with their out-of-the-box firmware, and in every test the ASUS P6X58D-Premium produced results there were 25 MB/s faster than the other motherboards. After we received the Marvell Magni Firmware 1.0.0.1210, performance results were much more level across the board.

Beginning with the second-generation SATA Solid State Drive attached to the EX58-UD4P to produce a reference score, the Intel ICH10 controller and M225 delivered a 198 Mb/s average read speed with 218 MB/s peak performance. Using the same M225 SSD on the other motherboards, Gigabyte's X58A-UD7 uses the SE9128 to produce 206/226 while the ASUS P6X58D-Premium uses the Marvell SE9123 chip to deliver 202-226 Mb/s. The add-in HighPoint Rocket 620LF delivered 200/222 using an integrated Marvell SE9128 chip.

Switching to the third-generation SATA-6G compatible Crucial RealSSD C300 Solid State Drive, the 222/223 MB/s reference score produced with a SATA-3G Intel controller becomes obsolete. The Crucial C300 SSD performed at 305/313 on the Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 motherboard, which was matched by the ASUS P6X58D-Premium and HighPoint Rocket 620LF add-in card. As firmware is updated, it becomes increasingly likely that performance will change as well.

Random Access tests are divided into 512b, 4KB, 64KB, 1MB and random size test files sizes. The Random Access test measures the performance of random read or write operations. The amount of data which will be read varies from 512 bytes to 1 MB. Performance is reported in operations per second (IOPS), average access time, and average speed. Benchmark Reviews has focused only on 4KB transfer size IOPS read performance for this article.

HD-Tune_Read_IOPS_X58.png

Read IOPS performance was very similar among all SATA controllers when testing the Crucial M225 SSD, with the Intel ICH10 producing an average score of 6942. The RAID-capable Marvell SE9128-equipped Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 delivered nearly 5% better performance than Intel's ICH10 controller and was nearly identical to the SE9128-equipped HighPoint add-in card, while the ASUS P6X58D-Premium also produced matching read-from IOPS performance.

Using the SATA-6G Crucial C300 SSD for testing, the Intel ICH10 controller reported an average of 7147 read-IOPS performance. Gigabyte's X58A-UD7 produced 7999 for a 12% boost in performance, which the HighPoint PCI-E card and ASUS P6X58D-Premium set pace with.

Marvell_SE9128_BIOS_Setup.jpg

All Marvell SE9123/SE9128 SATA 6Gb/s controllers are limited to 5.0Gbps by the PCI-Express bandwidth, regardless of motherboard manufacturer. Ultimately these Marvell-based controllers all depend on driver and firmware improvements to deliver increased performance and improved stability, and the company to offer the most up-to-date software will be in the best position. Watch for software updates to be available directly from the Gigabyte product website to ensure optimal speeds.

Drive Hardware



 

Comments 

 
# Smart TPM initialization problemJohn Berthoty 2010-03-18 14:34
Tried to initialize, got an error: InvalidArgument=Value of '-1' is not valid for 'index'. Parameter name: index

Any clues anyone?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Smart TPM initialization problemOlin Coles 2010-03-18 14:41
You should take this question to our forum, where there are more people avialable to respond. You should also include more information, such as your O/S, software version, and steps taken.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 MotherboardLeibritz 2010-04-09 10:09
none MB utilizes more than 3GB of memory on 32-bit Windows...
Report Comment
 
 
# SATA-II and SATA-III Raid 0 SupportBill 2010-04-16 14:47
(1) Are there two SATA controllers on the motherboard, one for SATA-II and one for SATA-III ?

(2) Either way, will the respective SATA controller support Raid 0 for two SATA-II SSD storage devices ?
Report Comment
 
 
# Answered in the article...Olin Coles 2010-04-16 14:51
"There are two eSATA ports available with a 4-pin Molex power connector between them for a total of two eSATA ports. In regards to standard integrated SATA ports, the X58A-UD7 motherboard offers six Intel ICH10R (colored blue) Southbridge ports capable of RAID-0, 1, 5, and 10. Along side these ports are four SATA-6.0 connections supplied by the Marvell 88SE9128 controller (colored white) which support RAID-0, 1, and JBOD."
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Answered in the article...Bill 2010-04-16 14:56
Perfect! Thanks for the information :)
Report Comment
 
 
# ProlimaTech MegahalemsDustin 2010-04-21 14:38
Did the ProlimaTech Megahalems fit with the included mobo cooler which takes up a pci express 1.0 slot?
Report Comment
 
 
# No problemsOlin Coles 2010-04-21 14:59
The Hybrid SilentPipe is positioned below the Northbridge, if you choose to use it. This add-on is nowhere near the CPU, and doesn't get in the way of any heatsinks I've tested.
Report Comment
 
 
# ThanksDustin 2010-04-21 15:05
Thanks for the fast response. I'm a big fan f your work :)
Report Comment
 
 
# SATA 6.0Gb HDDTinus Pruis 2010-05-14 13:34
Hi, on the GA-X58A-UD7 with the I7-Core.. which SATA port do I connect my 2TB Barracuda HDD (7200) with Windows 7? On SATA 0 or SATA 6 where the 6.0Gb connection I think should be connected?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: SATA 6.0Gb HDDOlin Coles 2010-05-14 13:40
Hello Tinus: Although the Barracuda XT's are SATA-6G compatible, you won't see a difference. The X58A-UD7 motherboard offers six Intel ICH10R (colored blue) Southbridge ports capable of RAID-0, 1, 5, and 10. Along side these ports are four SATA-6.0 connections supplied by the Marvell 88SE9128 controller (colored white) which support RAID-0, 1, and JBOD.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: SATA 6.0Gb HDDTinus Pruis 2010-05-14 14:14
Hi Olin, thank you for your quick response.. hmm ~ sorry but you are going way over my head..
iaw. I can connect my hdd on SATA 0 and the DVD-rom on SATA 1? Won't make a difference, cause I also don't run any RAID configuration..
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: SATA 6.0Gb HDDOlin Coles 2010-05-14 14:16
Conntect them to any of the ports, and you'll be fine. Ideally the hard drive should be on one of the white ports, and everything else on blue.
Report Comment
 
 
# TempSobo 2010-06-01 14:48
Hi everyone !
My i7-930 cpu is at 60*C temperature in idle with no OC and box cooler, what can i do ?
Report Comment
 
 
# Best CPU Cooler PerformanceOlin Coles 2010-06-01 15:44
@ Sobo: You need to read our "Best CPU Cooler Performance" articles located in the Cooling section from the main menu of this website.
Report Comment
 
 
# crossfiremartin 2010-06-19 05:29
is there is a problem to make crossfire with this motherboard + HDD with sata 3 - because i read 1 of pci x16 slots start working at x8 when sata 3 and another story with fps drop at half when this sata 3 is working with 1 vga at this slot(x16 who drops at x8)
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: crossfireOlin Coles 2010-06-19 08:11
Martin: your question has already been answered in this review, as well as in the user comments.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: crossfiremartin 2010-06-20 09:32
well first -thank you for the answer
second - i didnt made my question exactly correct - yes i can read there its possible and 'no problem ' but i cant find any real time test with high end crossfire/sli configurations + sata 3 HDD ,thats why i asked
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 Motherboardleo 2010-07-21 20:54
hay alguna que sea parecida a esa y que este un poco mas barata para un i7 920
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 MotherboardOlin Coles 2010-07-21 20:59
Este es un producto para overclockers serios, pero hay modelos mucho más asequible.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 Motherboardleo 2010-07-21 21:05
entonces esta es para overlockers.igual gracias porque me escribis en español.
Report Comment
 
 
# MrSheps 2010-08-01 01:01
Is trim supported by the GA-X58A-UD7 in raid0 with 2 OCZ vertex2e ssd drives.
Report Comment
 
 
# Not In RAIDBruceBruce 2010-08-01 05:58
TRIM is currently not supported by any SSDs in any RAID configuration. It is not strictly a function of the Motherboard, more like an alliance between the Southbridge, device drivers, the OS, and the firmware on the SSD.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: MrOlin Coles 2010-08-01 07:06
It doesn't matter what motherboard you use, TRIM is an O/S and SSD function. On the Intel ICH10 controller, it's my understanding that TRIM only works with the Intel Rapid Storage Driver when used in a RAID array.

I have to tell you though, SSDs aren't HDDs. You don't need RAID-0, and you'll notice no real-world difference like you would with a HDD.
Report Comment
 
 
# OlinJJ 2010-09-30 17:33
While TRIM is a function of the OS, the SSD must support the functionality. TRIM cannot be passed to drives in a RAID array. TRIM also does not require the Intel Rapid Storage Driver.

AHCI performance is, however, affected by the IRSD. You will get a noticable increase in performance with AHCI on AND using the updated IRSD. There is currently no way to make TRIM work with RAIDed drive members.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: OlinOlin Coles 2010-09-30 18:03
Sorry to correct you, but TRIM actually is possible on SSDs in a RAID array. They have to be on an Intel ICH controller, and you have to use the Intel Rapid Storage Driver.
Report Comment
 
 
# AlsoJJ 2010-09-30 17:38
Though SSDs are not HDs, there in fact IS a huge difference in performance with RAIDed SSDs. The real issue is, unless you are using a dedicated PCIe RAID card (not the onboard ICHxx RAID solution which uses the SATA bus), your crazy fast SSD RAID will be limited by the 250 MB/sec SATA II bottleneck. Two Crucial Real SSDs would reach more than 500 MB/sec on a PCIe RAID card solution.

Would you really know the difference between 250 and 500 MB/sec when you're opening IE, Word, or any day-to-day application? Probably not. For applications that benefit from multiplication of throughput rates... yes, you would. Again, TRIM would be out the window in that configuration.
Report Comment
 
 
# Motherboard recommendationNag 2010-10-29 20:34
May I trouble you to recommend a Gigabyte X58 motherboard?

Main use: cpu-intensive, computational. memory or HDD i/o is not an issue.

My constraints:
1. cpu = i7 950
2. stable motherboard--no overclocking, no fancy features, must be reliable and durable with most kinks ironed out, good thermal features.
3. 6 memory slots: prefer to start with 12GB (3 x 4GB)--again speed is not a constraint--with a max of 24GB.
4. Summers are hot--45C
5. Prefer one eSATA port and USB 3.0 Do not care about SATA 3. Perhaps you can recommend one MB wihout eSATA, USB 3.0 being a constraint and one MB with eSATA and USB 3.0.

Thanks
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Motherboard recommendationOlin Coles 2010-10-30 09:11
Hello, thanks for posting but this is really a question for our forum. The quick answer is that X58 is intended for SLI/CrossFire video card sets, and would be 'overkill' for your needs. Because of the processor, I recommend any of the lesser-expensive X58 options. Nearly all will feature eSATA and USB 3.0, and SATA-6G is merely an option. Take a look at NewEgg, and sort by price.
Report Comment
 
 
# Sata 3.0Oni 2011-03-01 15:44
Guys i want to Connect my 250 gb HDD to the 6gb/s how do i do it i know its a stupid question but is it possible to increase the data transfer I have 1 HDD

My PC
Core I7 930 O.C. ar 3.4 ghz
Gigabyte X58 A UD7
Hitachi 250gb HDD
2x 250 GTS SLI
Gigabyte Odin Pro 550 PSU
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Sata 3.0Olin Coles 2011-03-01 15:46
Don't bother. SATA 6Gb/s connections are only useful for drives designed to reach past 3GB/s, and your hard drive only offers 1GB/s speeds. Only the newest SSDs are able to make use of the extra bandwidth.
Report Comment
 
 
# Dualdavid wisotsky 2011-03-27 09:24
I just came off a dual zeon tiger board thinking I would go faster with this 4 core 3.2
I was very disappointed with this board. Stalls and makes allot of hard drive noise So i shut off paging helped a little
Then i shut off power saving features and it seems to really help
I think the default starves the CPU
If you have good cooling do it
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter