Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card Performance E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Olin Coles   
Tuesday, 07 December 2010
Table of Contents: Page Index
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card Performance
GeForce GTX 570 Closer Look
GeForce GTX 570 Detailed
Features and Specifications
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX10: 3DMark Vantage
DX10: Crysis Warhead
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Battlefield Bad Company 2
DX11: BattleForge
DX11: Lost Planet 2
DX9 SSAO: Mafia II
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Tom Clancy's HAWX2
DX11: Unigine Heaven 2.1
GeForce GTX 570 Temperatures
VGA Power Consumption
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Conclusion

VGA Power Consumption

For power consumption tests, Benchmark Reviews utilizes an 80-PLUS GOLD certified OCZ Z-Series Gold 850W PSU, model OCZZ850. This power supply unit has been tested to provide over 90% typical efficiency by Chroma System Solutions. To measure isolated video card power consumption, Benchmark Reviews uses the Kill-A-Watt EZ (model P4460) power meter made by P3 International.

A baseline measurement is taken without any video card installed on our test computer system, which is allowed to boot into Windows 7 and rest idle at the login screen before power consumption is recorded. Once the baseline reading has been taken, the graphics card is installed and the system is again booted into Windows and left idle at the login screen before taking the idle reading. Our final loaded power consumption reading is taken with the video card running a stress test using FurMark. Below is a chart with the isolated video card power consumption (system without video card minus measured total) displayed in Watts for each specified test product:

Video Card Power Consumption by Benchmark Reviews

VGA Product Description

(sorted by combined total power)

Idle Power

Loaded Power

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 SLI Set
82 W
655 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 Reference Design
53 W
396 W
ATI Radeon HD 4870 X2 Reference Design
100 W
320 W
AMD Radeon HD 6990 Reference Design
46 W
350 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 Reference Design
74 W
302 W
ASUS GeForce GTX 480 Reference Design
39 W
315 W
ATI Radeon HD 5970 Reference Design
48 W
299 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 Reference Design
25 W
321 W
ATI Radeon HD 4850 CrossFireX Set
123 W
210 W
ATI Radeon HD 4890 Reference Design
65 W
268 W
AMD Radeon HD 7970 Reference Design
21 W
311 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 470 Reference Design
42 W
278 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 Reference Design
31 W
246 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Reference Design
31 W
241 W
ATI Radeon HD 5870 Reference Design
25 W
240 W
ATI Radeon HD 6970 Reference Design
24 W
233 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 465 Reference Design
36 W
219 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680 Reference Design
14 W
243 W
Sapphire Radeon HD 4850 X2 11139-00-40R
73 W
180 W
NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GX2 Reference Design
85 W
186 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Reference Design
10 W
275 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770 Reference Design
9 W
256 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280 Reference Design
35 W
225 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 (216) Reference Design
42 W
203 W
ATI Radeon HD 4870 Reference Design
58 W
166 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 560 Ti Reference Design
17 W
199 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 460 Reference Design
18 W
167 W
AMD Radeon HD 6870 Reference Design
20 W
162 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 670 Reference Design
14 W
167 W
ATI Radeon HD 5850 Reference Design
24 W
157 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti BOOST Reference Design
8 W
164 W
AMD Radeon HD 6850 Reference Design
20 W
139 W
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GT Reference Design
31 W
133 W
ATI Radeon HD 4770 RV740 GDDR5 Reference Design
37 W
120 W
ATI Radeon HD 5770 Reference Design
16 W
122 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Reference Design
22 W
115 W
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 650 Ti Reference Design
12 W
112 W
ATI Radeon HD 4670 Reference Design
9 W
70 W
* Results are accurate to within +/- 5W.

The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 surprised us with chilly idle and lukewarm loaded temperatures when we tested it last month, but the surprises keep coming as we measure power consumption on the GTX 570. Utilizing 15 of 16 possible SMUs, the GeForce GTX 570 requires two 6-pin PCI-E power connections for proper operation. Resting at idle with no GPU load, the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 consumed 31W - identical to the GTX 580 by our measure. Compensating for a small margin of error, this roughly matches idle power draw from the GeForce 8800 GT and slightly less than the GeForce GTX 280 or GTX 465. Compared to the GF100 inside the GeForce GTX 480, it's nearly 26% lower.

Once 3D-applications begin to demand power from the GPU, electrical power consumption climbs. Because the GeForce GTX 580/GTX570 series uses new hardware power monitoring technology not included on previous GeForce models, we've had to work around the power-throttling effects enabled when using FurMark or OCCT. To do so, we merely renamed Furmark.exe to Crysis.exe and changed some file names and locations. Measured at full throttle with FurMark's 3D torture load, the GeForce GTX 570 topped out at 241W maximum power draw. NVIDIA's stated max TDP is 219W, which is 22W less than our measurements - although power supply efficiency rating and margin of error have not been factored in.

While the idle power draw is identical to older models like the GeForce 8800 GT, it's still better than the GeForce GTX 280 and more recent GTX 465 models. At full power load the GeForce GTX 570 matches up to the ATI Radeon HD 5870, but still operates well below the levels of ATI's Radeon HD 5970 and the GeForce GTX 580.



 

Comments 

 
# No award ?Succellus 2010-12-07 08:46
No award and no final rates ?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: No award ?Olin Coles 2010-12-07 08:53
I'm experimenting. I occasionally get complaints about our ratings, so with this review you guys can draw your own conclusion.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card Performanceaberkae 2010-12-07 09:08
High end gpu for $350, now we are starting to see the affects of gpu wars!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceRealNeil 2010-12-07 09:49
Very compelling video card here. This looks to be a good replacement for the pair of GTX460's I was going to get. Maybe I'll get a pair of them,...(one for each box)...Ha-Ha! For the performance rendered, it really IS a good price point.
Report Comment
 
 
# sweet deal !LASER 2010-12-07 13:39
thnks guys for fast review.. its 3Am but i dont really sleep so readind reviews..

i didnt thought 152hp machine can beat 177hp.... but yea it matches it and so much price difference...
totally stunning card compared to older price/perfor ratios by Nvidia...
i was going for GTX 580 but now i gotta think 170$ extra for 6fps in heavy games...

Finally i gotta again wait for price downs on GTX 580 ... or i will go for GTX 570 which is sweet deal !!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceServando Silva 2010-12-07 19:01
Is it possible to update the article with GTX 460 SLI results? Many people are still thinking about getting a pair of 460s.
Thanks for the article!
Report Comment
 
 
# more than agreeresere 2010-12-08 06:51
call us lazy or whatever, but it would be nice to see in the same article the results of both 460 SLI/ 570.
Anyway good job once again.
Report Comment
 
 
# BF: BC2 resolutionBunzing 2010-12-08 05:32
The Bad Company benchmark is probably done a 1920x1080 resolution, but I just want to no for sure. Thanks

Lookin like a great card btw. First time in years that i'm looking to buy a nvidia card instead of an ati. I sent thermaltake a mail to see wether the awesome coolingapparatice ISGC-V320 will fit (believe me it's a great cooler, but has to be supported some way because of the enormous weight).
Report Comment
 
 
# Old School Gaming MonitorBruceBruce 2010-12-08 07:29
The second set of results (on the right) are for 1920 x 1200. The world has gone 1080P crazy, but we still like the "extra" 20% of vertical view on the old-school 1920 x 1200 monitors.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: BF: BC2 resolutionOlin Coles 2010-12-08 08:12
I've updated that chart to show the test resolutions. Sorry for the confusion!
Report Comment
 
 
# BFBC 2 BenchmarkManuKey 2010-12-08 07:08
The result on BFBC2 are WAY to high... especially with 8X AA and HBAO...
Report Comment
 
 
# You haven't been paying attentionBruceBruce 2010-12-08 07:23
Take a look at some other reviews, and you'll see that these results are typical. In my recent testing, I'm getting 1-2 FPS higher than this, with a P55-based system. See my MSI Radeon HD 6870 article on this site for examples:

GTX 460 - 47.5 FPS
HD 6870 - 55.7 FPS
HD 5870 - 65.9 FPS
Report Comment
 
 
# Resolution for hi-res testingBruceBruce 2010-12-08 07:31
The results above are for 1920 x 1200 screen resolution. Sorry, forgot to mention that.
Report Comment
 
 
# BFBC 2 Benchmark --> SPManuKey 2010-12-08 11:43
Anyway I juste realised that this is a Singleplayer benchmark (for a multiplayer oriented game... lol)... Multiplayer w/ 32+ players are way more demanding!
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: BFBC 2 Benchmark --> SPOlin Coles 2010-12-08 12:00
Actually, the frame rates are about the same. I've tested it both ways, and the multiplayer maps generally produce the same FPS scores.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: BFBC 2 Benchmark --> SPManuKey 2010-12-08 12:22
I think you're the first I hear saying that! just check the forums... in general, people seem's to get better performances in Singleplayer than multi...
Report Comment
 
 
# Higher ping=Lower FPSNator 2010-12-09 12:13
Usually this computes. Ergo, playing online gives lower FPS.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Higher ping=Lower FPSOlin Coles 2010-12-09 18:35
I think you're confusing network latency (lag) for video frame rate (FPS). Lag might appear to display choppy frames, but it's because of a network issue and not the video card. Most people avoid playing first person shooter games with a ping over 60ms.
Report Comment
 
 
# temps____ 2010-12-08 18:52
The temps are higher than the 580!? Are you sure the 520 is not throttled? I can't think of anything else.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: tempsOlin Coles 2010-12-08 19:20
I'm going to presume you meant the 570, and not 520.

The temperature difference still has me a little baffled. The cooling solution is the same, and the test methodology was identical. Yet, somehow, the GeForce GTX 570 sample I received heats up more than both the GTX 580 I have.

If I hadn't retested three different times, I would still think there was something amiss. It is what it is.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: tempsTim 2010-12-09 12:00
My GTX 580 heats up above 80 degrees under load so in that way its similar to 570
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: tempsOlin Coles 2010-12-09 12:10
No, it doesn't. Our reference GTX 580 did not heat up to 80 degrees, it produced only 70C under full load. This was explained in the 'GeForce GTX 570 Temperatures' section of this article.
Report Comment
 
 
# Could just be a very well produced 580Nator 2010-12-09 12:16
Temperatures can vary a bit between cards, even though they appear the same, its all down to the measuring stick, and a little bit to how good the contact between cooler and gpu/ram is. The temp. sensors can be off by a ways sometimes.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceTim 2010-12-10 00:42
I use a Gigabyte gtx 580. First I tried it in a 2008 Mac Pro (running Windows 7) For some reason the cooling didn't work properly and the card went too hot and fail (above 100 degrees). Putting the card in a i7 system and it does work ok. Idle temps are around 48 degrees. Playing BFBC2 temp goes up to about 82.
Running Adobe apps / premiere pro MPE temps are about 55 degrees.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceOlin Coles 2010-12-10 08:19
Is your Gigabyte GTX 580 overclocked at all? I'm just curious, because our overclocked ASUS GTX 580 could reach 80C but the reference card only produced 70C.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceTim 2010-12-11 00:51
No it is a stock Gigabyte GTX 580. I am talking degrees in Celcius no Fahrenheit :-)
Report Comment
 
 
# GTX480 Max Tempaaron686 2010-12-10 22:08
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 480 - 82°C (max)

How can the 480 have an absolute max temp of 82C? I've seen this card go to 95 - 100 easily, having both the 480 and the 570 at the same max temp is baffling.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceTim 2010-12-11 00:53
By the way, running Vray RT v2 GPU mode, the temp goes up to 86 degrees Celsius.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceLaszlo 2010-12-13 00:46
I would like to see the 570's preformance against 470 with same GPU, shader and mem clock speed (and memory timings too). Then - I think - that the differences would be almost nothing, only that little which comes from 448 vs 480 CUDA cores.
I searched for overclocking maximum results and not surprisingly the fastest 470 results clocked about 900+ (air, stock cooling) MHz - just the 570 results I found so far. With my lame mind (as I'm not an insider in the hw industry) I think that the ~900 is a limit that is nvidia made (with their 'protection'), not the limit that comes from the 40nm manufacturing process. And this things clearly show that the 570's higher clocks doesn't come from the more refined manufacturing (as older gen CPUs got more overclockable when their newer revisions came out) just from marketing strategy. Like you design a Porsche GT3, but first you sell a version to the public which is limited just a bit higher than the Boxter's (and call it Boxter2). Then playing that you worked hard (but did nothing), you limit the product less, say 911 Turbo. But literally the same product.
I will wait for 1: when the prices starting to drop; 2: the next gen.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 570 Video Card PerformanceLaszlo 2010-12-13 01:59
Sorry, 800+, not 900+ (the GPU overclock). Mem-wise: if the gddr5 can be clocked as high as 1200 on the 5870, then maybe NV have some surplus GPU power on their shelf to unleash (as the 512 bit wide membus too - remember GTX285). Not too surprising that mem can be pushed ~1150. My ex8800 GTS512's mem - which is GDDR3 - was stable on that clk, and if it's 65nm GPU was stable on 750 (750/1950/1150 @1,15V), then a two (55nm then the current 40nm) gen later 40nm chip's 600-800 MHz clk is somewhat funny.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter