Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Storage arrow Corsair X256 CMFSSD-256D1 MLC SSD
Corsair X256 CMFSSD-256D1 MLC SSD E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Storage
Written by Olin Coles   
Monday, 07 September 2009
Table of Contents: Page Index
Corsair X256 CMFSSD-256D1 MLC SSD
Features and Specifications
First Look: Corsair X256 SSD
Indilinx Internal Components
SSD Testing Methodology
Random Access Time Benchmark
Basic IO Bandwidth
Random Access IOPS Tests
I/O Response Time
Linear Bandwidth Speed
Sequential Performance Tests
Buffered Transaction Speed
Solid State Drive Final Thoughts
Corsair X256 Conclusion

HD Tune Pro Benchmarks

In the past, Benchmark Reviews has avoided HD Tune benchmarks because the software was so similar to others already being used in our articles. However, EFD Software has released several versions of this program, which now adds functionality and features not available in previous revisions. The latest edition of HD Tune Pro allows random access read and write testing, a feature not available to other similar software benchmark tools. HD Tune is a low-level test that will not operate on a drive which contains a partition, so Benchmark Reviews uses DISKPART to prepare hardware and remove any partitions before conducting these tests.

Random Access tests are divided into 512b, 4KB, 64KB, 1MB and random size test files sizes. The Random Access test measures the performance of random read or write operations. The amount of data which will be read varies from 512 bytes to 1 MB. Performance is reported in operations per second (IOPS), average access time, and average speed. Because it is our intent to compare one product against another, Benchmark Reviews has focused on random transfer size IOPS performance.

HD-Tune_Read_Corsair_CMFSSD-256D1.png

Benchmark Reviews has tested the 256GB Corsair CMFSSD-256D1 against a collection of top-performing desktop storage drives for our random IOPS benchmarks. The 4 KB random IOPS performance in HD Tune measured 7444 for read IO, and an impressive 16244 for write. The 4KB read IOPS was better on the X256 than it was on the Vertex Turbo, which scored 7272. The Vertex Turbo offered 17358 4KB write IOPS, which was slightly better than the Corsair X256. Random IOPS swung back into Corsair's favor, however.

HD-Tune_Write_Corsair_CMFSSD-256D1.png

The tight range of IO is an indicator of operational bottlenecks. For example, the WD VelociRaptor WD3000HLFS SATA Hard Disk Drive indicates a read-IOPS range of 10-150 whereas the average SSD might offer 200-1,000. As a direct result, in most cases SSDs will offer a much higher IO over their hard disk counterparts.

HD-Tune_Random_Transfer_IOPS_ICH10.png

Charted above, the OCZ Vertex EX (firmware 1.20) enjoys the benefit of SLC construction that delivers traditionally better IOPS performance than MLC counterparts, and also offers the best measured random IOPS performance of the group with 384 read and 477 write IOPS. The Corsair X256 and OCZ Vertex Turbo (MLC) lead the pack of Indilinx-based SSDs which follow behind (Vertex, CT128M225, Torqx, UltraDrive ME, Agility) and performs at near-SLC levels with 327 read and 429 write IOPS. The Intel X25-E Extreme SSD performed well, and produced 337 random read IOPS, and 394 write.

Our test results were obtained after each SSD had been prepared using the DISKPART program, and in the case of products using the Indilinx Barefoot controller they were further prepared with the Sanitary Erase application. In our tests, we discovered that the maximum performance results (charted) would decay as subsequent tests were performed. As a word of caution, applications such as Sanitary Erase (SE) and Wiper offer immediate but temporary restoration of original 'pristine' performance levels.

Drive Hardware

Benchmark Reviews measures I/O Response Time and IOPS performance using the Iometer tool in our next section...



 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter