Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Processors arrow Intel Core i5-750 Processor BX80605I5750
Intel Core i5-750 Processor BX80605I5750 E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Processors
Written by Mathew Williams   
Tuesday, 08 September 2009
Table of Contents: Page Index
Intel Core i5-750 Processor BX80605I5750
Features and Specifications
Closer Look: Core i5-750
Testing and Results
Lavalys EVEREST
Passmark PerformanceTest
PCMark05 Benchmark Suite
Crysis Gaming Tests
Devil May Cry 4 Gaming Tests
SPECperfview 10 CATIA
MAXON CINEBENCH R10
Performance Features and Overclocking
Power Consumption
Intel Lynnfield Final Thoughts
Core i5-750 Conclusion

Performance Features and Overclocking

In this section, we examine the performance features and overclocking potential of the Core i5-750. As i mentioned earlier, none of the Core i5-700 seres parts will support hyper-threading. However, they do have the advantage of Intel's revised Turbo Boost Technology. Turbo Boost is enabled by default and was used in all of our benchmarking so far. However, I ran a few of benchmarks without it to illustrate the its effect on performance. You'll find those results below.

intel_core_i5-750_cpuz_overclock.jpg

I also decided to test how for I could push the Core i5-750 manually. If you go this route, one of the first decisions you'll have to make is whether to enable or disabled Turbo Boost. With it enabled, every change to the base clock will increase the turbo frequency. As you can see above, I was able to increase the bus speed to 180 MHz for a base clock speed of 3.6 GHz and a maximum turbo clock speed of 4.32 GHz. Needless to say, that's a great result. However, turbo boost actually limited the overclock of the base clock speed. If you disable it, you lose the higher turbo clock speed, but should be able to increase the base clock speed of all four cores a bit more. For the purposes of this review, though, I kept Turbo Boost enabled.

intel_core_i5-750_features_everest_integer.jpg

In the EVEREST integer benchmarks, turbo boost has a slight, but significant impact, particularly in the Queen test. Of course, the overclocked Core i5-750 has a massive lead over both.

intel_core_i5-750_features_crysis.jpg

Moving on to Crysis, we find that turbo boost again has a significant effect, at least at the lower resolution and settings. And once again, the overclocked result is simply phenomenal. However, no increase to clock speed can remove the limitation of our Radeon HD 4850, as demonstrated in the last two tests.

intel_core_i5-750_features_cinebench.jpg

Finally, in CINEBENCH we see how turbo boost varies with threading. In the single threaded benchmark, enabling turbo boost amounts to a 14.8% increase in performance. However, in the multi-threaded benchmark the maximum turbo boost multiplier is decreased and turbo boost results in only a 5.7% increase. The only thing left to do is overclock the i5-750 manually by increasing the bus speed, which clearly results in the highest scores--but at the expensive of power, heat, and hardware longevity.



 

Comments 

 
# Why is the i7-920 suddenly out of the mix on page?Fred Ubercake 2010-02-17 09:30
Why not continue to include the i7-920 in the benchmark graphs? I don't get it.
Report Comment
 
 
# How can you say...Fred Ubercake 2010-02-17 09:35
..."in many tests, it even matched the Core i7-920" when the charts suddenly don't include it from the PCMark page on???
Report Comment
 
 
# Why Windows XP and not Win 7Julian 2010-10-11 12:54
Why are you using Windows XP and not the Win 7 64. I believe Windows 7 can achieve better results aspecialy 64 bit
Report Comment
 
 
# Windows 7 hadn't been released yetOlin Coles 2010-10-11 12:57
If I had to guess, it's because Microsoft Windows 7 didn't arrive until about two months after this article was published.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter