Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Processors arrow AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOX
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOX E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Processors
Written by Mathew Williams   
Thursday, 13 August 2009
Table of Contents: Page Index
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOX
Features and Specifications
Closer Look: Phenom II X4 965 BE
Testing and Results
EVEREST Benchmark Tests
Passmark PerformanceTest
PCMark05 Benchmark Tests
Crysis Gaming
Devil May Cry 4 Gaming
SPECperfview CATIA Tests
Overclock Results
Catalyst 9.8 Results
Final Thoughts

Passmark PerformanceTest

PassMark PerformanceTest is a PC hardware benchmark utility that allows a user to quickly assess the performance of their computer and compare it to a number of standard 'baseline' computer systems. The Passmark PerformanceTest CPU tests all benchmark the mathematical operations, compression, encryption, SSE, and 3DNow! instructions of modern processors.

In our tests there were several areas of concentration for each benchmark, which are combined into one compound score. This score is referred to as the CPU Mark, and is a composite of the following tests: Integer Math, Floating Point Math, Find Prime Numbers, SSE/3DNow!, Compression, Encryption, Image Rotation, and String Sorting. For this review, we've also decided to run the memory benchmark, which results in a composite score based on the following tests: small block allocation, cached read, uncached read, write performance, and large block allocation.

amd_phenom_II_x4_965_passmark.jpg

From past reviews, we've seen that Intel processors consistently score higher in this benchmark. Once again, that's the case. The extra clock speed of the Phenom II X4 965 allows it to inch closer to the Intel Q9450, but it still can't quite pass it up. The X4 965 does, however, perform about 6.5% faster than the X4 955. What's interesting is that this performance increase also applies to the memory score. It appears that the at least some memory tests used by Passmark were affected by the difference in clock speed.



 

Comments 

 
# speed comparisonRosale B. Devocion, Jr. 2010-03-07 19:37
Hi There!

I would like to ask from you guys if which is better AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE or Intel® Core? i7-920. I am planning to assemble such high speed processors but I am confused about these two products.
Please send me your reply to my email which I provided.

Thanks & More Power,

R. Devocion, Jr.
Report Comment
 
 
# Hello sirkevin 2010-03-14 03:30
sir, if you want performance, go for Core i7 920 though. It much faster than Phenomm II x4 965. but the phenom is much cheaper than core i7.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOXShimada 2010-03-29 16:32
kevin, Are you sure man?
Phenom IIx4 965 in some aspects is better than Corei7 920,and core 2 Quad Q9650.
take a look at this processors comparison:
##anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3619

Phenom II 965 is cheap and with a very good performance.
Report Comment
 
 
# over allTicojon 2011-05-23 10:07
Over all passmark rates both the i7 920 and Q9650 higher than the Phenom965 BE but they're comparable. Q9650 very comparable, i7 920 less comparable...however pricewise there's no comparison. Phenom 965BE is WAY less expensive! Phenom 965BE is a quadcore after all.
Report Comment
 
 
# Maxfeild Park Children's HomeIsaiah Simms 2012-04-02 08:49
sir, if you want performance, go for Core i7 920 though. It much faster than Phenomm II x4 965. but the phenom is much cheaper than core i7.
Phenom IIx4 965 in some aspects is better than Corei7 920,and core 2 Quad Q9650.
take a look at this processors comparison:
##anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3619

Phenom II 965 is cheap and with a very good performance.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter