Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Processors arrow AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOX
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOX E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Processors
Written by Mathew Williams   
Thursday, 13 August 2009
Table of Contents: Page Index
AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOX
Features and Specifications
Closer Look: Phenom II X4 965 BE
Testing and Results
EVEREST Benchmark Tests
Passmark PerformanceTest
PCMark05 Benchmark Tests
Crysis Gaming
Devil May Cry 4 Gaming
SPECperfview CATIA Tests
Overclock Results
Catalyst 9.8 Results
Final Thoughts

AMD Phenom II Final Thoughts

Flagship processors tend not to retain their title for very long and that's exactly the case here. Less than four months after its introduction, the Phenom II X4 955 is being replaced by the X4 965. It's a good move for AMD, though, particularly with the Fall shopping season gearing up and Intel's Lynnfield launch looming around the corner.

It's also good news for consumers and an interesting milestone for the industry: the X4 965 is the first quad-core processor ever to ship at 3.4GHz, making it the highest clocked processor on the market. Combined with the solid performance of AMD's C2 revision of Deneb and the unlocked Black Edition multipliers, the X4 965 is a welcome addition to the Phenom II family.

amd_phenom_II_x4_965_pib.jpg

HDZ965FBGIBOX Conclusion

Throughout our benchmarks today, the 3.4GHz Phenom II X4 965 consistently topped the charts. Compared to the previous 3.2 GHz X4 955 flagship model, the extra 200 MHz led to an average performance increase of roughly 6%, making it the fastest Phenom II to date. It also put up a decent fight against Intel's Q9450, pulling ahead in nearly every benchmark.

The X4 965 earns top marks for construction quality as well. We torture all of our system with a combination of Prime95 and FurMark before running any benchmarks and not once did we notice instability. We've come to expect this kind of quality from modern processors, and the Deneb-based X4 965 certainly does not disappoint.

Based on the same C2 revision of Deneb as the X4 955, the Phenom II X4 965 also carries the same architectural benefits. This includes full AM3-DDR3 support, 8MB combined L2 and L3 cache, and backwards compatibility with AM2+ and DDR2. The only downside seems to the slightly increased TDP: 140 watts versus the 955's 125 watts.

Fortunately, that TDP didn't hinder our overclocking results. Thanks to the unlocked multipliers, we were able to achieve 3.9 GHz core clockspeed with our X4 965 BE, up 100MHz from our X4 955 review. Some thorough benchmarking also illustrated the importance of the cpu-northbridge frequency. After bringing this frequency up to 2.8GHz, we noticed a significant improvement in memory-intensive benchmarks as well as some of our gaming tests.

Given the increase in performance compared to the X4 955, it's refreshing to see that AMD is actually introducing X4 965 at the same price point. You can find the Phenom II X4 965 on newegg.com for $249. Of course, that also means a price drop for X4 955, which may entice some. Fortunately, AMD is planning several bundle deals that promise to bring the price down during launch.

Pros:Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award

+ Highest clocked processor on the market
+ AM3 & DDR3 support
+ Unlocked multiplier
+ 8MB of total cache
+ AMD OverDrive 3.0
+ Excellent price/performance

Cons:

- 140W TDP

Ratings:

  • Performance: 9.50
  • Construction: 9.25
  • Functionality: 9.00
  • Overclock: 9.50
  • Value: 8.50

Final Score: 9.15 out of 10.

Excellence Achievement: Benchmark Reviews Golden Tachometer Award.

Questions? Comments? Benchmark Reviews really wants your feedback. We invite you to leave your remarks in our Discussion Forum.

NewEgg.com


Related Articles:


 

Comments 

 
# speed comparisonRosale B. Devocion, Jr. 2010-03-07 19:37
Hi There!

I would like to ask from you guys if which is better AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE or Intel® Core? i7-920. I am planning to assemble such high speed processors but I am confused about these two products.
Please send me your reply to my email which I provided.

Thanks & More Power,

R. Devocion, Jr.
Report Comment
 
 
# Hello sirkevin 2010-03-14 03:30
sir, if you want performance, go for Core i7 920 though. It much faster than Phenomm II x4 965. but the phenom is much cheaper than core i7.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: AMD Phenom II X4 965 BE CPU HDZ965FBGIBOXShimada 2010-03-29 16:32
kevin, Are you sure man?
Phenom IIx4 965 in some aspects is better than Corei7 920,and core 2 Quad Q9650.
take a look at this processors comparison:
##anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3619

Phenom II 965 is cheap and with a very good performance.
Report Comment
 
 
# over allTicojon 2011-05-23 10:07
Over all passmark rates both the i7 920 and Q9650 higher than the Phenom965 BE but they're comparable. Q9650 very comparable, i7 920 less comparable...however pricewise there's no comparison. Phenom 965BE is WAY less expensive! Phenom 965BE is a quadcore after all.
Report Comment
 
 
# Maxfeild Park Children's HomeIsaiah Simms 2012-04-02 08:49
sir, if you want performance, go for Core i7 920 though. It much faster than Phenomm II x4 965. but the phenom is much cheaper than core i7.
Phenom IIx4 965 in some aspects is better than Corei7 920,and core 2 Quad Q9650.
take a look at this processors comparison:
##anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?i=3619

Phenom II 965 is cheap and with a very good performance.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter