Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Motherboards arrow Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 Motherboard
Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 Motherboard E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Motherboards
Written by Miles Cheatham - Edited by Olin Coles   
Monday, 22 December 2008
Table of Contents: Page Index
Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 Motherboard
Intel Core i7: Platform Information
Intel X58-Express Platform
DX58SO Features and Specifications
Intel DX58SO First Look
Intel DX58SO: Closer Look
Intel DX58SO BIOS
Intel DX58SO BIOS Options
Testing Methodology
Intel DX58SO: Overclocking
PCMark Vantage System Tests
Vantage and 3DMark06 Tests
SANDRA 2009 System Tests
EVEREST Ultimate System Tests
CINEBENCH
Crysis, WIC and Power System Tests
"Smackover" Final Thoughts
Intel DX58SO Conclusion

Testing Methodology

This is Benchmark Review's fifth article where the Intel i7 series of processor was used. The focus in this review shifts from solely the processor to more that of the motherboard. In our other releases we strictly used the Intel DX58S0 Smackover motherboard with the only comparison being the different processors we tested. Today we'll use a single processor, the Intel i7-965 Extreme Edition and compare its performance using the Intel DX58S0 heads-up versus the ASUS P6T X58 Deluxe Motherboard. In our previous reviews we also compared a previous generation X48 motherboard, the ASUS P5E3 using an overclocked Intel X3350 processor to establish some semblance of comparison to then versus now. To put is mildly, the P5E3 and X3350 were completely outclassed in every arena except for gaming in which the results were a bit closer. For that reason to day we will be comparing only the two X58 motherboards using the fastest processor currently on the planet, mano-a-mano. For those extreme enthusiasts out there we also tested both motherboards using our full array of benchmarks overclocked.

Unfortunately when testing systems of this type there is not set of "grass roots" tests that will completely speak to the to the system's overall performance. It is therefore necessary to comparatively test the performance of the CPU, Memory, Hard Drive(s) and Graphical Rendering and then draw your assumptions from the results of these tests. We chose an array of benchmarking tools (captioned below) that we felt would give our readers a complete of a picture of each system's performance. Each benchmark test program begins after a system restart, and the very first result for every test will be ignored since it often only caches the test. We then ran each of the tests a minimum of three times and reported an average of each test's results. We ran enabled Turbo Boost on both motherboards with the processors at their stock clock speeds.

System #1

  • Motherboard: Intel Extreme Motherboard DX58SO
  • Processor: Intel Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition [3.20 GHz clock speed]
  • Processor Cooling: Noctua NH-U12P with 1366 adapter kit
  • System Memory: QIMONDA 3 x 1GB DDR3 1067 CL7 non-ECC UDIMM
  • Disk Drive: Intel High Performance SATA SSD X25-M 80GB MLC,

System #2

  • Processor: Intel Core i7-965 Extreme Edition [3.20 GHz clock speed]
  • Processor Cooling: Noctua NH-U12P with 1366 adapter kit
  • System Memory: QIMONDA 3 x 1GB DDR3 1067 CL7 non-ECC UDIMM
  • Disk Drive: Intel High Performance SATA SSD X25-M 80GB MLC,

Intel DX58SO Intel DX58SO
CPU-Z View of DX58SO in Turbo Boost Mode

Intel DX58SO Intel DX58SO
CPU-Z View of ASUS P6T Deluxe in Turbo Boost Mode

Common Components

  • Graphics Card: Zotac GTX 260 Amp2!
  • Optical Drive: ASUS DRW-2014L1T SATA Optical Drive
  • Enclosure: Lian Li PC-A7010B Black Aluminum Full-Tower ATX Case
  • PSU: Thermaltake W0132 Toughpower Cable Management 1000 Watt
  • Monitor: Dell 24-Inch Widescreen LCD Monitor 2407FPW
  • KVM Switch: ATEN CS1782 USB 2.0 DVI KVM Switch
  • Operating System: Windows Vista 32-bit Ultimate SP-1 with all current updates

Benchmark Applications

  • PCMark Vantage
  • 3DMark Vantage v1.01
  • 3DMark06 v1.1.0
  • SANDRA 2009
  • SuperPi Mod 1.5XS
  • EVEREST Ultimate v4.60.1500
  • Cinebench R10
  • World In Conflict
  • Crysis v1.21 Benchmark



 

Comments 

 
# eSATA port not stableGuru 2010-02-28 02:25
Hi,

Please dont buy this board if you are planning to use eSATA port.
Report Comment
 
 
# I've had eSATA issues alsoDogwood 2010-04-16 02:30
I was using an eSATA volume on my DX58SO for backup using Clonezilla. At first this worked fine, but at some point I started getting I/O errors in the middle of the process. I swapped out various components and tried both ports, but the unreliability persisted. I was speculating that maybe one of the BIOS updates rendered the eSATA ports unstable (it would presumably be BIOS, because Clonezilla isn't running Windows or Windows drivers). Very mysterious...it's interesting to see that someone else cautions against eSATA. Anyway, I don't have a critical need for eSATA, so I've just stopped using it; can substitute USB, albeit with loss of speed. But I'm never comfortable when something isn't working properly; I want to know the full story.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: I've had eSATA issues alsoGuru Prasad H B 2010-04-16 06:28
I faced the same problem, with WD MY book (1TB) external Hard disk.
The eSATA port works for first 5 min, and the windows freezes for some time or i used to get PD(or some such) time out warning and newer stops. Initially i suspected about the WD hard disk, when i contacted them, they said there is some problem with marver controller (which is used in DX58SO mother board). so i took this issue with Intel support team, but its of no use..

Tried installing latest BIOS, Marvel driver, Intel Matrix storage drivers which are available in Intel webpage, its of no use.

My intention to buy DX58SO was mainly for using eSATA port for which i had huge data (around 25 Gb) to be used for testing purpose. now because of the one HDD (eSATA) is not working why will i invest on another HDD for which to make sure the problem is not there in Intel Mother board. So i brought low cost PCI-eSATA card (which is 10 $) which is working fine with DX58SO.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 MotherboardDogwood 2010-04-16 13:40
Aha! I finally found an official word that maybe clarifies the need for the unusual extra "auxiliary power" connector on the DX58SO. This Intel page indicates that the extra power cable is only necessary when the primary power connector is an old 2x10 connector, but it's not necessary with a newer 2x12 connector. So this is just Intel's way of making the board compatible with older hardware.

##intel.com/support/motherboards/desktop/sb/cs-012073.htm

"Next generation high-end graphics cards will consume from 75 watts up to 150 watts of power. The PCI Express x16 connector can deliver up to 75 watts. In order to achieve 75W, an ATX12V power supply with a 2x12 main power connector is recommended. However, 75W can also be achieved with ATX12V power supplies with 2x10 main power connector when using the 1x4 power connector on the board."
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 MotherboardDave_O 2010-07-23 08:31
FYI - Purchased this board in June, 2010. Intel has changed the internal SATA connectors so they plug in from the back, not from the top as noted in the review.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 MotherboardOlin Coles 2010-07-23 08:33
Thank you for the update! Do you happen to know which revision your motherboard is (should be printed), so I can update this article?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 MotherboardDave_O 2010-07-23 09:07
The label on the box is - AA E29331 - 702
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 MotherboardOlin Coles 2010-07-23 09:15
Hmm... usually it will be printed on the motherboard itself. For example: R2 or Rev 2.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 MotherboardClyde Snider 2011-11-24 05:41
Where did the name "Smackover" come from? Was it from the town Smackover, Arkansas?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel DX58SO Smackover X58 MotherboardDavid Ramsey 2011-11-24 08:04
Good question. Intel doesn't say.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter