Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Cases arrow Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX Case
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX Case E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Cases
Written by David Ramsey   
Tuesday, 11 September 2012
Table of Contents: Page Index
Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX Case
Features and Specifications
Closer Look: Exterior
Closer Look: Interior
Building a System
Mini ITX Case Final Thoughts
CM Elite 120 Advanced Conclusion

Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Computer Case Review

Manufacturer: Cooler Master
Product Name: SFF Chassis
Model Number: RC-120A-KKN1
UPC: 884102017315 EAN: 4719512037836
Price As Tested: $49.99 (Newegg)

Full Disclosure: Cooler Master provided the product sample used in this article.

The last Cooler Master case I reviewed was the enormous (and enormously expensive) Cosmos II. This case is so huge that Cooler Master felt obliged to define a new category for it: the "ultra tower". It was so big it wouldn't fit under my desk, and so heavy, even empty, that it's very difficult for one person to lift it to the top of their desk

The Elite 120 Advanced is about as far from the Cosmos II as you can get and still be considered a "computer case". Since it's designed to use a standard ATX power supply and has a full-sized 5.25" bay, some might argue that it's on the large end of the mini-ITX case spectrum, and while they'd be right, it's still pretty tiny in absolute terms.

cooler_master_elite_120_342.jpg

While Cooler Master has a broad line of cases, the Elite 120 Advanced is currently their only mini-ITX case. Since it can accommodate a full-sized ATX power supply and video card, there doesn't seem to be any reason you couldn't build a killer small gaming system in it.



 

Comments 

 
# Do you know the aprox cost?Robert Crew 2010-04-19 18:08
I know that nikon s560 cost around 174 dollar on the US, how much does the s600 cost, there is no doubt this is an incredible digital camera
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX Casekzinti1 2012-09-17 21:57
Exactly how does the front fan blow over the 5.25" bay which is sealed on the bottom by a solid plate?
Besides the enormously wide fan mounts, the pitifully tiny front-fan intake ports can't possibly help anything. At all. CoolerMaster is known for poor performing fans supplied in their cases that are regularly tossed and replaced by any conscientous builder. Myself included. CM should just keep the fans and lower the case price commensurately.
You should've mentioned that Ivybridge cpu's are strictly verboten due to practically zero cooling. There's really no mention of the loud, high-pitched whine from the side fan, either.
This case definitely needs an 80mm. top exhaust fan, but then it wouldn't work since there's no air intake source, so this point is rendered moot. I seriously doubt intake filters would be worthwhile since there's so little air intake to begin with.
On the other hand, this case is a prime example of what the consumer should NOT buy. Congratulations on proving this very point! Thanks for the heads up! I generously give this case an overall rating of 6.5. It is quite cute, though it is rather unusable for even a very slightly warm-running system.
BTW, what does the above post have to do with this case review?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX CaseDavid Ramsey 2012-09-17 22:10
The fan doesn't blow air over the 5.25" bay. Who cares? Has your optical drive been overheating of late? Airflow over the hard drive bays is more important, and the front fan works fine for that. The front fan has plenty of air intake: the slots I showed run almost the full vertical height of the front panel, stopping just below the 5.25" bay.

If you don't like the "loud, high-pitched whine" (certainly not what I heard) from the side fan, then remove it. Just four screws.

The case design leaves no space for an 80mm top exhaust fan, so I don't know where you'd put one.

I've been running my personal Hackintosh in this case since I received it, using the hardware mentioned in the article, and haven't had any overheating problems at all.

The first comment has nothing whatsoever to do with the review. Perhaps Olin can remove it.
Report Comment
 
 
# Poor performing fans?Steven Moeller 2012-10-04 17:12
I'm not sure that I've ever seen ANY fan that performs well at 80mm. High airflow 80mm fans sound like B2 Bombers flying over Britain. I don't consider that good performance.

I've been building air-cooled PC's since Win3.x, and I've certainly never seen 1 or 2 fans perform well at such small sizes. I certainly won't be using any fans under 120mm ever again. As to CM not making any fans that perform well, I'll rebuke that with the fans that came in my game rigs current case, the Storm Sniper Black Edition. These 3 great big honking 200mm fans are whisper quiet at full speed and move more than enough air to keep my OC'ed 4GHz AMD Phenom 2 X6 rig supplied with enough cool air that my Noctua NH-D14 doesn't even hiccup when they are set at the lowest speed.

Frankly, the fans on the review case don't perform to your standards simply because they are small. To perform better they would need to be faster, which means they would be louder, also. Seeing that your already complaining about the noise, I doubt you'd appreciate it.
Report Comment
 
 
# hmm,kryteris 2012-09-18 00:37
I would have to rate functionality at maybe 5.0. The airflow is a big deal, especially on itx setups w/ full size video cards. They could have sacrificed more of the hard drive space for airflow. All you really need for hd's in a small setup is an ssd and (1) 3.5 hd.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX Casekryteris 2012-09-18 00:40
Now for the price of $50.00 vs silverstone sg08 at 200.00 -there is great value.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX CaseMike McCloud 2012-09-18 16:54
I used this case to build an HTPC/Server using an MSI E350IA-E45 motherboard, 4 gigs ram and 3 Hard Drives. Runs cool % quiet
Report Comment
 
 
# GeminII M4 - Very Tight Fit!Dave 2012-09-28 23:57
Did you use the standard back plate with the GeminII M4? I found that it made contact with components on the back of the board. Had to use the rubber standoffs that were included with the kit which made for a very tight fit. It also resulted in the backplate pressing against the floor of the case.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: GeminII M4 - Very Tight Fit!David Ramsey 2012-09-29 08:44
I didn't notice any problem with the backplate on the ASUS P8Z77-I motherboard I used...
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: GeminII M4 - Very Tight Fit!Dave 2012-10-01 21:33
Upon closer look at one of your pic's I noticed the cooler is oriented differently then mine. You have the heat pipes facing towards the memory and back i/o plate, where mine is 90 degrees to this (i.e., heat pipes towards the daughter board and PCIe slot.) Not sure if that matters much as I believe the back plate can only be positioned one way in order for it to clear the three bolts (2 at one end and 1 at the other)of the factory back plate.

When I get a chance to pull out the motherboard I'll have another look. Might be a few days though. Thank you for the quick reply David.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: GeminII M4 - Very Tight Fit!Dave 2012-10-03 20:56
Okay, got a chance remove the motherboard tonight and no matter how the cooler backplate is oriented it will come in contact with some components on the back of the motherboard. From what I can see the only way to prevent this is to use the supplied rubber pads. Unfortunately, this raises the back plate further off the motherboard and when installed in the CM120 it makes solid contact with the floor of the case, even causing the P8Z77 board to bend/arch slightly.

If I've missed something please let me know. With the exception of this one issue everything installed fine. Although, I do fine the front & side fans a little noisy (emiting a buzzing sound from both fans) so I expect to swap them out soon.

Thanks for the detailed review David.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: GeminII M4 - Very Tight Fit!David Ramsey 2012-10-04 17:27
I can't explain the fitment problems you're having. The back plate on my cooler has a rubber padding pre-applied to the side facing the motherboard, but it all seems to fit and work well.

I'm using an ASUS P8Z77-I motherboard; is that what you're using?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: GeminII M4 - Very Tight Fit!Dave 2012-10-04 19:09
Same motherboard, Asus P8Z77-I. If you're using the rubber padding then that makes sense, otherwise I couldn't figure out how you were able to install the backplate without it coming in contact with some of the motherboard components on the back side.

Here is a pic of my kit showing the rubber pads (lower portion of pic), #prohardver.hu/dl/cnt/2012-05/85571/cm_geminii_m4_2.jpg, and although it's tough to judge the hight of the pads from this pic, they add apprx. 1/8" to 3/16" (guessing, don't have them in front of me). Add this to the already raised back plate and that's why it comes into contact with the bottom of the case -- interesting that you didn't experience this.

Thanks for continuing to stick with me on this issue David.
Report Comment
 
 
# A higher standoff for the mb?Trevor 2012-10-04 21:57
Interesting discussion. Would taller main board standoffs clear the bottom of the case? And Cooler Master support desk? Seems the case and cooler should be compatible with each other together with the current Asus mini ITX board.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: A higher standoff for the mb?David Ramsey 2012-10-05 08:47
Taller standoffs would not work since the I/O panel and card slot in the motherboard would no longer match up with the cutouts on back of the case.

Dave, I misspoke when I said I was using the rubber padding (that turned out to be on another machine; I have lots of 'em around here). I'm using the large multipurpose bracket shown in your image. The four black Intel "feet" face down on the motherboard, with the raised center section sitting slightly about the backing plate on the motherboard.

Where, exactly, are you having component clearing problems?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX CaseTrevor 2012-10-05 12:27
Different editions of the GeminiII M4? From the product page: * Supplied accessories may differ by country or area. Please check with your local distributor for further details.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX CaseDavid Ramsey 2012-10-05 13:36
Maybe, but the bracket in his photo looks just like the one I'm using.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX CaseDave 2012-10-05 21:36
Assuming that our brackets are the same then have a look at Post #89 from overclock.net forum here, #overclock.net/t/1241916/cooler-for-asus-p8z77-i-deluxe/80.

Although he is using a different CM cooler the back plate appears to be the same as the Geminii M4. The MoBo is also different but it shows alsmost exactly what I'm experiencing with the P8Z77-I.

Wish I had more time to remove the board from my system and take a few pic's but I'm Currently out of town working long hours -- just enough time to type this then hitting the sack.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced Mini-ITX CaseTrevor 2012-10-09 08:36
The rubber washers seem to be too high to use underneath the motherboard in the case. A thin piece of cardboard traced out and cut to shape of the backplate should provide the insulation. The insulation would protect the solder points and not conduct a charge, unless it got water on it. I read about using cardboard (cereal box thickness) in other cases like this. Hopefully works here.
Report Comment
 
 
# Plastic....Bruce 2012-10-09 08:43
Better to use some plastic sheeting. It's a better insulator.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Plastic....Trevor 2012-10-09 08:51
Plastic wouldn't 'absorb' the solder points into its surface to even out the height with the corners.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter