Archive Home
OCZ Core Series SATA-II SSD OCZSSD2-1C64G E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Storage
Written by Olin Coles   
Monday, 21 July 2008
Table of Contents: Page Index
OCZ Core Series SATA-II SSD OCZSSD2-1C64G
OCZ Core Features and Specifications
OCZ SSD Support Addendum
OCZ Core SSD Closer Look
SSD Testing Methodology
System Speed Test Benchmarks
HD Tach RW Benchmarks
ATTO Disk Benchmarks
Core Series Final Thoughts
OCZ CORE SSD Conclusion

ATTO Disk Benchmark Results

EDITORS NOTE: Please read Solid State Drive (SSD) Benchmark Performance Testing to understand how the benchmarks used in this article should be interpreted.

The ATTO Disk Benchmark program is free, and offers a comprehensive set of test variables to work with. In terms of disk performance, it measures interface transfer rates at several different user-specified intervals and reports read and write speeds. The drives seek and access times are not statistics made available in this application, which makes this a considerably basic tool, although the adjustable test settings allow for a large range of differing results. Manufacturers seems to like this tool because it offers them the ability to reduce the test length load size to produce high benchmark results. Conversely, Benchmark Reviews uses this tool with the largest (32 MB) test chuck used to produce our test results.

Bandwidth results are indicated as the transfer rate in the image below, showing the performance curve for the Core Series SATA II 2.5-Inch SSD from 512 Bytes up to 1 MB test chunks. OCZ specifies bandwidth expectations as 120-143 MBps read and 80-93 MBps write for their OCZSSD2-1C64G SSD, and so far our own bandwidth test results indicate that these are optimistic yet possible figures.

Read performance begins to plateau from 64.0 KB to 1024 KB and generates a 112,383 KBps (109.75 MBps) bandwidth around 512 KB, indicating a preference for larger file chunks. The same is true for the write bandwidth, which sustains a 77.10 MBps bandwidth peaking at the 512 KB test chunk range.

ATTO_Disk_Benchmark_OCZ_CORE_SSD.png

Since ATTO Disk Benchmark offers test settings for each transfer file size from .5 KB to 1 MB, we used the largest (1 MB) statistic to build the chart located below. In this chart, I have organized the products using the sum of their read and write bandwidth speeds to determine position rank.

Once again, the MemoRight GT SSD demonstrates that an optimized SATA-I controller can outperform even the latest SATA-II controllers. The Seagate 7200.11 hard drive gets the closest in terms of performance, followed by the OCZ Core Series SSD. Not far behind was the OCZ 64GB SATA-II SSD, Mtron Pro 7000 16GB SSD, and Samsung SSD.

The mid-range of performance is filled by the Mtron MOBI 3000 SSD and Western Digital Raptor, which aren't really all that far off from the products positioned above them. On the other hand, the low-end of performance is a noticeable distance away. The Crucial / Lexar CT32GBFAB0 SATA-II SSD takes a major dip in write-bandwidth performance, which is mirrored by the Super Talent MasterDrive MX SSD and Silicon Power 64GB SATA SSD. I'm not entirely clear on the technology each of these lower-end SSD's contain, but considering that two of them are SATA-II and match the performance of our slowest SATA-I SSD's I would contend that a design improvement is in order.

ATTO_Disk_Benchmark.png

Originally I hadn't planned on including the ATTO Disk Benchmark results in this article. While the software is decent enough to mention, it was merely included because almost all SSD manufacturers test with it... and for very good reason I have learned. After several tests had been completed, I began to see why they decided on this particular software for benchmarks. What I like least about ATTO Disk Benchmark is how you can manipulate the settings to produce extremely wide range results from the same product.

As an example, if you reduce the total test length size from 32 MB (used in our testing configuration) to one of the smaller sizes the benchmark results are more than 30% different (as in higher bandwidth). This reason alone is enough for manufacturers to tweak their own test configurations for self-benefit. Nevertheless, in regard to our ATTO tests the entire range of SSD products is very well represented with our configuration. It should be noted that with cache buffers growing larger and larger, perhaps there's a reasonable middle ground that will provide the best of both worlds. I suspect that hybrid drives could play an important role in this argument very soon.

Disk Hardware Tested:

In our next section, we address the collection of test results and give our conclusion on the OCZ 64 GB Core Series SATA II 2.5-Inch SSD OCZSSD2-1C64G.



 

Comments 

 
# RE: OCZ Core Series SATA-II SSD OCZSSD2-1C64GRaj Naraine 2010-09-19 14:52
Hello I, bought a Core 64GB - OCZSSD2-1C64G sometime
ago. It worked fin with Vista and XP. Win 7 has a problem
it never loads on this SSD .. Is there any firmware etc..
I can use to have win 7 workng on this SSB.

Best Regards
Raj Naraine
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: OCZ Core Series SATA-II SSD OCZSSD2-1C64GOlin Coles 2010-09-19 15:39
There have been several firmware updates for this product. Visit here: ocztechnologyforum.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?236-End-of-Life-OCZ-SSD-s-(Core-V1-V2-Apex-Summit)
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter