Archive Home arrow Editorials arrow How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video Games
How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video Games E-mail
Articles - Opinion & Editorials
Written by Olin Coles   
Thursday, 17 May 2012

How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video Games

NVIDIA GeForce GRID and NVIDIA VGX Cloud Computing Technology Introduce Change to Video Games and the PC Platform

NVIDIA recently unveiled two new graphics technologies at the 2012 GPU Technology Conference: NVIDIA GeForce GRID and NVIDIA VGX. You're probably not familiar with either of these 'Cloud Computing' technologies, but in the next few years they'll develop to become quite commonplace. One day in the not so distant future, you could find yourself choosing between a NVIDIA GeForce GRID subscription or NVIDIA GeForce graphics card to play the latest high-end game. In this editorial I explore what these two new technologies offer, and how they will change the graphics industry.

Not everyone has a computer device with the power to do whatever they want with it. If you're reading this then you're one of the lucky few, but for many people of other nations a modern computer is an unknown luxury. Most desktop PC systems can be upgraded with new hardware, but notebook computers lack this ability and cannot run may of the latest video game titles or play back high-definition multimedia content. Tablet and SmartPhone devices suffer a similar fate, and have limited capability. Traditionally, video games have been played on the most capable system, usually a PC or console. Now NVIDIA GeForce GRID technology removes this need for an expensive system, and gives gamers the ability to play video games from any connected device with a display screen (think: HDTV, monitor, notebook, tablet, SmartPhone, etc).

Back in 2002 I built a Citrix MetaFrame server to conduct an experiment: connect several very old PCs into one mainframe computer system and enable friends to play video games on each using the high-end GPU installed on the Terminal Server. The experiment was successful with low-end 2D multiplayer games (this was before the era of countless browser-based games that now cover every genre), but multiplayer 3D games such as Quake III lacked OpenGL support on our server platform. Using a Local Area Network connection to join several friends together via Ethernet cables into a multiplayer game worked very well, up until high-speed Internet became the household standard across the planet and made LAN parties virtually obsolete. Ten years later NVIDIA has made my experiment into reality, and one remotely-located high-end system can offer the performance that other connected devices lack.

The Internet is Everything!NVIDIA_Black_Square_3D_Logo_250px.jpg

Some of us can remember back to a time when video games only offered one mode: arcade. It wasn't for many years later when dial-up Internet service was common that video games offered a multiplayer mode, and then many more years before broadband Internet helped make multiplayer gaming the standard (suggested reading: Before PC and Console Games: The Video Arcade). Now everything is connected, and it's difficult to find a modern video game title that doesn't feature an online multiplayer mode. Multiplayer games helped fuel the home entertainment market, while wiping out an entire arcade industry.

Although my Terminal Server experiment back in 2002 was uninspired, cloud-based gaming isn't new. First-generation cloud gaming platforms suffered high network latency times (ping) referred to as lag, had low quality graphics, and were expensive. NVIDIA GeForce GRID technology promises to overcome these issues and make game streaming as common as renting a movie online. Cloud-based NVIDIA GeForce GRID servers will be outfitted with several of the latest GeForce GPUs to provide the best graphics processing power available, while having lower server latency so that cloud-based video games play just like they were installed locally.

America is one of the greatest developed nations in the world, but it's also one of the worst for network infrastructure. NVIDIA GeForce GRID technology requires fast Internet connections in order for it to work well with real-time multiplayer games, especially first-person shooters where response and reaction times mean life or death. GRID networks need to offer a server cluster near to your Internet Service Provider to reduce packet transfer hops and travel time, or the network latency will get your character killed. NVIDIA VGX technology, which focuses on the Enterprise segment and relates to software applications, visual presentations, and multimedia playback, will require only a standard broadband Internet connection.

Cloud Computing Kills the Desktop PC... and Console.

Would you spend money on a new gaming console or desktop PC system upgrade if you could simply power-up any Internet-connected HDTV and start playing a library of video games using the best graphics settings possible? Most people would make the obvious choice to move with technology, but there will always be a few die-hards out there who refuse to keep with the times and cling to their old devices. Some readers may recall that several of my past editorials foretell a future where the desktop computer platform no longer exists, and this section ties into the others.

If you're not up to speed on this topic Benchmark Reviews has published related articles that go into detail on each topic: Fears and Predictions, Statistical Obituary, and How Video Games Killed Desktop PC Computing. If you haven't already read these articles, you should, and might also consider Killed By Overclocking and Saved By Overclocking as well. I might even convert you to my school of thought after you've read them all. So getting back to this matter of killing off PCs and game consoles...

NVIDIA GeForce GRID and NVIDIA VGX technology, once made available and adopted widespread, will mean that users won't need to buy that high-end computer system to play games or run complex design applications. They won't need a powerful processor and graphics card, extreme amounts of system memory, constant updates and patches, or expensive network servers... they'll merely need an Internet-connected device. Because some businesses may fear downtime and resist complete dependence on their Internet connection, the desktop computer platform could survive longer in the Enterprise segment than everywhere else, but the landscape for enthusiast hardware is certain to change.

Use Your Imagination

It's still too early to rate the value of NVIDIA GeForce GRID technology since there are competing product already available (such as OnLive and Evolve), but if we consider these announcements at face value there's plenty of potential for NVIDIA VGX server-side graphics to become the world standard for connected businesses. Websites are already server-side, as are many online games and productivity programs, so it's really not much of a stretch to imagine a day where most complex tasks are handled by an offsite super-computer. Most companies dread mandatory hardware upgrades made for the sake of operating on the latest version of essential software, and Cloud Computing's offset in costs could make sense for cash-strapped businesses.

Of course, this would mean steep declines in consumer revenue for everyone involved in selling computer hardware. Intel, AMD, NVIDIA, and everyone else in the supply chain would be hard-pressed to continue selling desktop hardware in a world where only servers need powerful components and everyone else uses a simple Internet-connected device to access them. All this time I've been worried that mobile phones, laptops, and game consoles might be killing off the desktop platform, but in reality it could be the server that does us in.

Only time will tell how accurate my predictions will be, so weigh-in with your comment below.


Related Articles:
 

Comments 

 
# RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video GamesDoug Dallam 2012-05-17 20:28
Wow, that's a lot to digest when contemplating what affects Cloud Computing will have on digital content. No way to tell how we would subscribe to individual "packages" or other apps. I'm probably going to sound really stupid here, but how do you get that vast amount of video information back to the screen? Right now pixel information is handled by the video card, board, and CPU. How are we going to move that amount of information from the pipe of the GPU traveling to the monitor through a cable over the internet?

And even though digital speeds through wires or fiber approaches the speed of light, the routers and switches etc are what gives us the lag. If we could get rid of all of the hardware between two point, we'd have virtually no lag at all, and that problem would be solved.

I'm thinking based on those two problems, this is going to require some sort of technology breakthrough of alien proportions. Bio-routers?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video Gamess2korpio 2012-05-17 21:35
What I sense here is a massive change in cable standa--- oh wait. There's Intel's LightPeak ;-)
Report Comment
 
 
# No Lag?Endocine 2012-05-27 11:15
"If we could get rid of all of the hardware between two point, we'd have virtually no lag at all, and that problem would be solved."

The only problem with what you say is that it still takes electrons which are traveling at only a fraction of the speed of light, or light itself which then has to be converted into an electrical signal, time to travel, so there is no such thing as "no lag at all", even with no equipment in between which is science fiction. It's not instantaneous and it's not "no lag", which is also science fiction, and even aliens on other worlds are still bound by physics.

The article title should read "How NVIDIA marketing says NVIDIA GeForce GRID Might Change Video Games"
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: No Lag?Olin Coles 2012-05-27 11:20
When you start writing, feel free to name the article whatever you want. Anyone who actually read the article will likely connect the dots and see how gaming will change in the future.
Report Comment
 
 
# 200+GTexel/s over broadband?FromUndaChz 2012-05-17 20:58
Maybe someday, but we're talking at least a decade before we can replace desktop PCs.. even with the 190GTexel/sec or so bandwidth we have on high end cards today, I don't think we would achieve that kind of speed by then. That's just such an insane and intense amount of data to feed back and fourth with >50ms or so acceptable pings. Latency kills the game, and this would be king of latency for quite some time to come. Wireless is honestly the only way I see this actually working, and wireless speeds will take even longer to catch up.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: 200+GTexel/s over broadband?FromUndaChz 2012-05-17 20:59
Not to mention, in a decade we'll be looking at a unit other than GTexel/s I'm sure, which is an even greater challenge to overcome.

You're right though, some day.. this will be reality.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: 200+GTexel/s over broadband?Olin Coles 2012-05-17 21:21
You say ten years, and I say about two. After installing Terminal Server systems for the past twelve years, I've learned it takes about 300KB downstream bandwidth for a remote user to enjoy motion video at their terminal. However in a FPS game environment you'll be uploading pointer coordinates to the server, so total bandwidth will increase slightly.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: 200+GTexel/s over broadband?Doug Dallam 2012-05-17 21:24
Where does all of the video information come from? Is there some new technology that you haven't mentioned? Doesn't all of the video processed online need to get to the clients?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: 200+GTexel/s over broadband?Olin Coles 2012-05-17 21:30
Do you have any experience with Terminal Services? It's not streaming video, it's painting screen pictures at a specific FPS.
Report Comment
 
 
# Can we discuss further?Looking4Help 2012-05-19 20:59
I'm working on an architecture that you seem to have some experience with. I am at a point where I need more help and was wondering if we could discuss further how you could be of assistance?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video Gamess2korpio 2012-05-17 21:32
I'm still trying to digest the idea that my Lumia could play Dawn Of War II at the maximum graphical settings. What's next, audio GRID from Sennheiser?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video Gamesweilrich 2012-05-17 21:57
The nVidia solutions has one obvious, and well-stated drawback: the need for a pervasive, fast Internet connection. A quick overview of demographics will show where this model fails. Rural residents do not have access to fast Internet connections, fiber, cable, or DSL because the distance to the hub is too great to justify the cost.

I am one of those people who live in a very rural area, but am lucky in that a local entrepreneur decided to set up a radio network with reasonable speeds. The biggest caveat to the system is the cost. Both the installation of the radio - I live in dense forest and the radios must be mounted in the tops of the 200 foot trees - and the monthly fee make the system very expensive.

For example, to get 786k downloads (and 256k uploads) I pay $80 a month. The radio cost $200 and I had to pay a tree climber $150 to put it up in a tree. I also had to pay for almost 300 feet of cable (200 up the tree 70 more to the house) and, as most tech-savvy people know, that is close to the limit of cat5 capability.

Most of my neighbors do not have high speed access to the Internet. Instead, they still rely on antiquated dial-up (yes, 28k baud modems) to check email - they cannot surf the web, or play even simple flash games. The nVidia grid will not help people who cannot get or afford high speed Internet connections. Those people still need good GPUs and fast computers to play games.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video GamesMack 2012-05-17 22:00
I think this idea is pretty futuristic. It might be possible to "technically" perform cloud video rendering under very controlled conditions. The reality tho, is that most "gamers" are going to be using extreme resolutions and desiring > 30 FPS for all their interaction. This is actually much more bandwidth intensive than your average youtube video. (Which by the way STILL has to be buffered, and suffers from frequent interruption even on a connection that can handle 20 megs per sec down.) So, another thing is that traditional video is 1 file, that can be buffered and cached, but a video game frame, cannot be handled like a traditional video because the perspective of each gamer is completely unique to every other gamer. Ultimately, its a losing proposition that offers no true advantage to the consumer, and cannot possibly be performed at reasonable cost to the "cloud".
It would require that the "Cloud" rendering farm have at least the power of all the players on the net such that no player would suffer from significant / noticeable lag due to video degradation.
For example: It would mean an Average of 25,000 to 100,000 times the processing power of a single high-end Geforce or ATI card, with upload capability on the internet that equates to at least an average of 1080p for most gamers at 30 fps or better.
Its simply over reaching into the existing infrastructure, which cannot handle that much upload, and over reaching into the existing rendering farm technology that it would be capable of keeping up with the technology and total numbers of users.

While I admire the "vision" for such a technology, it will be relegated to a very select few who can afford it.
This type of technology will also have to overcome the constant desire for gamers to increase their screen resolution,and FPS.

Ultimately, it will take at least 10 to 20 years before the internet can handle this amount of upload.

To be clear, this is not just a traditional upload model. Each individual game must have their own frame rendered. The bandwidth requirement would be huge.

Of course, once the internet is capable of such a massive upload, the "gamer" will have upped the ante, and started demanding 10 times the resolution that exists today.

I just don't see this model being adopted by the masses.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video GamesOlin Coles 2012-05-18 07:14
I think you should do more research. First, there's very little to upload beyond mouse position and keyboard input... which amounts to about 8KB/s. Next, understand that most people playing online games obviously have a broadband Internet connection, so it's moot to point out those without it. Finally, products like OnLive and Terminal Services already do this. Now. Today.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video GamesMack 2012-05-18 08:04
Olin,
Yes, I should have specified "server upload".
I was referring to the upload that the "rendering service" will have to perform.
As you know, a traditional desktop client receives information from a server (downloads) and sends to server (uploads)
However... the same is true for a server.
A server must "upload" or serve the actual data, in this case the data must be served, and this uses upload bandwidth from the server point of view.
My apologies for not specifying that I was talking about the massive amount of server upload that would be needed to handle the frames.
The client will have little or no client side upload, but their download will be quite significant.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video GamesMack 2012-05-18 09:30
These services (Terminal Services, remote control desktop, VNC etc..) perform screen updates. this does not even come close to the amount of bandwidth that would be needed for "gamers".

We are talking about a different frame render for each gamer, not a frame that is shared and broadcast or multicast.

I look at my current screen: 1920x1200 for gaming, and my requirement for gaming is at least 30 fps ( I prefer >40 FPS)

720p streaming is 1.5 to 2 mbps compressed
and 1080p is around 5 mbps compressed.
(roughly)

A typical game like call of duty, world of tanks, eve online, or any other popular multiplayer game might have 10,000 to 30,000 people actively playing (or more).

At the finest level of granularity, each cloud service would have to minimally serve the current game zone for multiplayer.
For MMO games this could be hundreds of players.
You would need a service for each set of players...

Now matter how its done, the server bandwidth requirement is staggering.

With just 30 players that's 150 mbps in video rendering.

Also, I am going to side with the other posters here, and say...
Most gamers will not appreciate having to log in to a video render service to see their games.
Report Comment
 
 
# Olin is correctLooking4Help 2012-05-19 21:00
Let's discuss what we both know further please?
Report Comment
 
 
# are you kidding me?leignheart 2012-05-17 22:31
i think your all out of your minds. this is no way good. this is a form of control, always connected to nvidia, i dont like it, and do not want to be tethered to anything or anyone. and also lets not forget about the millions of people who are diehard enthusiests and building extreme pc's is one of the best joys in life. its like cutting the @#$#s off a dog, interest will go way down if everyone everywhere is the same. competition is the spice of life, and i like knowing my desktop is the top 1% of the world. i dont watn to be the same as everyone else. man society sure will be dull and bland. imagine if everyone had to have the same phone, or tv, or the same house, or drive the same car? this is a mistake.
Report Comment
 
 
# Radio HostComputer Ed 2012-05-18 04:39
"They won't need a powerful processor and graphics card, extreme amounts of system memory"

I am not sure we need these now. The truth is the rush forward in hardware has slowed quite a bit and the high end components are now more than ever a pure nitch market.

Lets begin with CPUs; at this moment the budget gamer is in CPU nirvana because we have reached the point from a gaming persecptive, in fact the total home user perspective, that anything over $200 for a CPU is a waste. Intel's i5 and i3 provide more than enough horse power for an amazing gaming experience. AMD might lag behind in benchmarks but even they have shown the FX is a very solid gaming CPU.

The GPU is no different because the mad rush for higher resolutions is over. Oh sure we have the multimonitor push but again very nitch market. Most gamers use a single monitor and 1080 seems to be the base we work from. Here we see essentially the same thing as the CPU, the $200 price point is were things go from great game experience changes to less for more as it were. The GTX560 and GTX 560ti deliver amazing gaming experience at 1080 as does the HD 6870 and even the HD 6850. Plus as the newer higher end models have hit prices have dropped, I saw a HD6950 for $200 on Newegg today.

Finally RAM, 4 gig is more the enough for a great gaming experience and GOOD RAM kits can be had in 4 Gig models for under $30.

Finally realise this is not a new idea, we have had a working service doing this same thing for a while now. Onlive actually delivers a very solid service. In oour look at the Sapphire Edge we were able to play some very modern games that the system could not play itself with ease using Onlive.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Radio HostOlin Coles 2012-05-18 07:11
So far, most of the people commenting on this story lack experience and understanding of Terminal Services, products such as OnLive, or broadband Internet statistics. Perhaps they'll be surprised when NVIDIA rolls this out in the next year or two.
Report Comment
 
 
# serious?leignheart 2012-05-18 07:15
dude, im glad and thank God almighty that everyone doesnt think like you, im sorry, but that garbage you rattled off isnt a good enough pc for me, im glad thats good for somebody but not me and alot of other people. if everyone thought like you then technology would never move forward and everything would be stagnate and very boring. your entitled to your opinion, but just so you know, your dead wrong. and p.s you have never experienced gaming until you have done it on a 30inch monitor in 2560x1600. or 3d or anything else, and that pc you listed wont cut it. i take offense to people who try to mainstream everything. its people like you who ruin things for everyone else. just saying.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Radio HostMichael 2013-02-05 11:15
Got some news for you... ALL INFORMATIONAL DATA IS ABOUT TO BE QUADRUPLED!!

Bluray will become the standard disc drive and the TB will become the GB and the GB the MB and so on.

4K Resolution is about to come out. Just to reproduce that it currently takes an ENTIRE Thunderbolt port on a Brand New Motherboard with Decent video support.

Can you imagine sites which would STREAM VIDEO In 4K? OR Sites which would download you a Movie in 4K?

And the system you named would be HORRIBLE to Run Crysis 2.

Also 4GB of Memory is NOT enough memory even for today. I have 16 in my system and have ran out of Memory.

Programs like Catia 5 Will take all the memory you can give it and keep running faster.
Report Comment
 
 
# You better not hold your breath.Slaunyeh 2012-05-18 05:35
This is plainly unrealistic due to the state of the world. it would get at least 15 years to implement something that would begin to work that way worldwide, more probably 30, at least.
Look how Diablo3 is getting kicked in the groin by DRM, server # and aleatory internet quality connection around the world.
Not mentioning those who move to no internet served place which are still 70% of the planet.
There is also the psicological aspect of it and securities issue, internet traffic is easely cracked, extremely monitored by all kind of agency and spying organs from around the world.
Report Comment
 
 
# That future isnt really here quite yetFoolsChaos 2012-05-18 11:21
I have a onlive account, and have even played multiple demo's on Gaikai, but it's not going to supplant PC's and consoles anytime soon, Maybe by the time the playstation 5 hits it might be more of a threat.

720p resolution, latency, bandwith caps, broadband availability, etc....too many reasons why it wont be the defacto gaming solution anytime soon.

What I think might be really interesting is if a gaming network like Xbox live and PSN use cloud streaming in game, rather than the entire game. Remember in Minority report where advertisements were geared to individuals thanks to eye scanners? We could have just that when playing a racing game, billboards with advertisements streamed straight to the game, constantly changing and geared to individual interests.

In game levels and items could be created on the fly due to your choice's in the game with everyone having a different experience. The building parts of the levels like textures, audio, etc could be on the disk while the geometry data could be streamed on the fly while in a game, allowing for a very custom personal experience. It's the crossover stuff that interests me rather than a replacement of a pc or console. If developers could figure out what to stream via the cloud quickly, having non latency import geometry like backgrounds cities etc could be really interesting.
Imagine a Mass effect scene where the level you are on is in the game, but the extremely detailed backgrounds and animations are in the cloud

I think I'll write something about this on my blog now lol :)
Report Comment
 
 
# I say ... ehCartigan 2012-05-20 16:58
While soft clients are no doubt the future of gaming, if simply because it is the ultimate end of anti-piracy measures, I certainly don't like it. Think always-on connections are bad? Wait until you need an internet connection of sufficient speed and stability to play the simplest game.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: How NVIDIA GeForce GRID Will Change Video Gamessaganhill 2012-05-21 06:12
One word comes to mind with this technology; "Dvix"
Report Comment
 
 
# DONT DO IT!!!!!leignheart 2013-02-05 11:17
no way people, this is a trick, take physical content over air any day. this is to cut out piracy and have total control over people, and the fact you would always have to have the internet to play a game you purchased for probably the same price or more than what you pay now!!!! DON'T DO IT!!!!!!
Report Comment
 
 
# AGAIN DONT DO IT!!!!!leignheart 2013-02-05 11:18
think about it people, I don't want to live in a world, where there is only cloud based garbage, everyone will be the same!!! who wants to be the exact same as everyone else!!!! I love building computers and having a high end machine, while other people love their consoles, who wants to see either of those go the way of the dinosaur for some cloud based crap that will never truly be owned by you. if you fall for this junk then your playing right into their greedy corporate hands.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter