| Best Thermal Paste Application Methods | |
| Articles - Featured Guides | |
| Written by Olin Coles | |
| Monday, 21 April 2008 | |
|
Page 4 of 6
Application on Round-base CoolersIf there's one thing our recent 33-Way Thermal Interface Material Comparison article has taught me, it's how the advice freely handed-out in discussion forums can often be wrong. After we wrote the article, many enthusiasts argued that spreading out the TIM with a latex glove (or finger cover) was not the best way to distrubute the interface material. Most answers from both the professional reviewer industry as well as enthusiast community claim that you should use a single drop "about the size of a pea". Well, we tried that advice, and it turns out that maybe the community isn't as keen as they thought. The image below is of a few frozen peas beside a small BB size drop of OCZ Freeze TIM. The image beside it is of the same cooler two hours later after we completed testing.
Decidedly, the BB size seems to be a much more appropriate amount for the PGA-478 application since it easily covered the one-inch round copper core of this Intel cooler and then some. Our images above have done sufficiently for depicting how much TIM should be used in a socket 478 cooler, but that's old news. To begin our experiments, we have started with the most basic of all designs. Circular coolers are very common equipment, with the product list spanning from small Intel-supplied stock cooler up to the larger Thermaltake MaxOrb aftermarket cooler. But while the round outer design may be popular to designers, it is much less common to find a circular base as the contact surface. To the best of my knowledge, the only coolers I have ever seen with this finish are those from Intel, but I digress. The design has its pros and cons, and regardless of cooling performance the round base is among the easiest to properly apply thermal paste to.
Because the raised copper center core is circular, the most logical application pattern is going to match the shape. A single drop of thermal paste roughly half the size of a BB is placed at the center of the cooler, which will theoretically spread evenly in every direction as pressure is applied. In all of our experiments, the images showing the depressed material once it has been spread out were all taken only moments after mounting the cooler. The thermal material is not allowed to cure, and the system is not powered on to begin thermal cycles. This is all done so that you can see the initial impact of mounting pressure and the direction that Thermal Interface Material travels. Please note that allowing the system to complete a few initial thermal cycles will thin the viscosity of the material and level out the paste, which will also allow it to bleed out towards the edges.
Judging from our cold test, a single round drop of thermal paste roughly half the size of a BB is more than sufficient to cover the entire mating surface of a stock Intel-included cooler. Ideally, you will want to use slightly less material than the amount shown above. Just remember that once heat is applied to thermal grease the viscosity will thin and spread out towards the edges just a little more, allowing the surfaces to come into closer (or direct) contact with each other. Keep in mind that thermal paste is only meant to fill the gaps, not coat the surface; perfectly flat metal on metal with no material in-between is your ultimate goal. Benchmark Reviews invites you to share your comments and suggestions for this topic in our Discussion Forum.
|
|






Comments
This kind of quality reviews makes it a lot easier for enthusiasts, like me, which do not have much resources for us to try such tests.
Thanks again... and i hope for more quality reviews from you guys..
Thanks Again!
Cheers!
Definitely going this route next time.
is still as keen as it thought, or in other words, it is not mistaken - your peas are mistaken ( they are really f***** up ;) ). I do hope this is cleared out, and I do hope that somebody confirms the size of the peas on the picture, based on my assumptions!
On a different subject, I would liked to have seen the results of mounting the square cooler that you did a thin, even spread of TIM on. How did it look when removed?
Also I would like to see heat readings from all these different application methods. While you may want one or the other spreads visually, how does that translate into actual practice? Could less coverage translate into a thinner layer that increases metal to metal contact, yielding better results than 100% CPU coverage but thicker layer? Inquiring minds want to know!!
now what is 'channels level' we are talking about here?
Moto
##overclockersclub.com/vimages/coolermaster_hyper_t x3/8.jpg
##goldfries.com/images/hwreviews/2010/coolermasterhypertx3/cmhypertx3_04.jpg
After having read your article, I have concluded that the two drops on the two centre partitions of the mounting base would be the best option for the Hyper TX3 cooler (to be used with an AMD Phenom II x6 1100T CPU), however, if sanding is not carried out, how would one deal with the space between the deeply set pipes and the CPU surface? Also, I have read that even merely touching the metal with a finger can cause grease and all kinds of particles to become stuck to it, so if sanding were to be carried out, how could one possible ensure that the cooler is thoroughly cleaned of all the residue from sanding? Thank you for any advice.