Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Processors arrow Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell Processor
Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell Processor E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Processors
Written by David Ramsey   
Saturday, 01 June 2013
Table of Contents: Page Index
Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell Processor
Features and Specifications
Haswell and Z87
Processor Testing Methodology
AIDA64 Extreme Edition Tests
PCMark 7 Tests
CINEBENCH 11.5
Media Encoding Benchmarks
SPECviewperf 11 Test
SPECapc Lightwave
Blender and POV-Ray
HD4600: DX11 Performance
Core i7-4770K Overclocking
Haswell Final Thoughts
Core i7-4770K Conclusion

HD4600: DX11 performance

Intel claims that since 2006, the performance of their integrated graphics has increased by 75 times, as measured by 3DMark 06. Granted this is a pretty old benchmark that targeted DX9 capabilities, but you couldn't use more recent DX10 and DX11 tools to benchmark the performance of older systems. Of course the problem is that the HD4600 GPU isn't going to be compared to 7-year-old DX9 video cards; it's going to be compared against the video cards you can buy today. In this case I'll use a reference design AMD Radeon HD6850 video card. For these tests I set the iGPU to use the maximum amount of shared memory (512M), and I tested it at both stock (1250MHz) and overclocked (1600MHz) speeds. Let's start with the Heaven 3.0 benchmark and the Aliens vs. Predator benchmark.

Heaven 3.0 settings: 1680x1050, moderate tessellation, medium shaders, no anti-aliasing, and 4x anisotropic filtering

Heaven.png

Here we see that the HD4600 iGPU is much quicker than the HD4000: at 18.1 frames per second average, it's a whopping 68% faster in this test than the Ivy Bridge iGPU. Overclocking doesn't buy us much here, though, and the Radeon HD6850 is still more than twice as fast.

AvP Settings: 1680x1050, medium textures, low shadows, advanced shadows off, SSAO off, no anti-aliasing, 8x anisotropic filtering

AvP.png

The performance difference is less dramatic with Aliens vs. Predator, but a 25% better frame rate is nothing to sneeze at, either. Again, overclocking doesn't help a whole lot, and the Radeon HD6850 is three and a half times faster.

Last, let's take a look at 3DMark 11's GT1 through GT4 tests. These tests render underwater and jungle scenes with tessellation and multiple light sources, with distance blur and other features added with post-processing passes. For these tests I selected the "Performance" presets and set the resolution to 1680x1050.

3dmark11 gt1gt2.png

The GT1 and GT2 render underwater scenes with lots of cloudy water, moving submarines with light sources, and large structures seen murkily through the haze. The HD4600 is 33% faster than the HD4000 in the GT1 test and 48% faster in the GT2 test.

3dmark11 gt3gt4.png

The performance improvement is even more dramatic in the GT3 and GT4 tests, which render complex jungle scenes during the day and night, with very complex lighting filtering through dense foliage as we explore ruins in the jungle. In GT3, the HD4600 is a solid 90% faster than its forebear, while the difference in the GT4 tests is an amazing 136%!

Last, let's take a look at the Lost Planet benchmark.

Lost_Planet.png

OK, this one's strange. Performance of the HD4600 is actually 27% slower than the previous generation HD4000! Even overclocked to 1600MHz, the HD4600 can't keep up with its Ivy Bridge parent. I'm at a loss to explain this one, but I ran the tests multiple times, and these are the results...

Now that we've run the benchmarks, let's see what went into overclocking the Core i7-4770K in the next section.



 

Comments 

 
# Laptops.alfie 2013-06-01 07:43
No wonder your OC crashed!

"even going to 4550GHz by tweaking the base clock resulted in crashes"

(4th para, pg 12)

Excellent write up David Ramsey. Thank you.

I wonder what TIM was used this time.

I feel this will be a very nice chip for the laptop crew as the GPU is a great step up.
I see nothing to make me shift from Sandy in my desktop, not even in the new chipsets.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorArgos 2013-06-01 08:01
I am a bit disappointed.
I will most likely get a new system this year an waited for Haswell (and the Nvidia 700 series), but it does not seem to be a very interesting new product for PC gamers like me.
Currently I have an i7920 with a GTX295.

Any recommendations, ideas, suggestions?
(My new GPU will most likely be the GTX780.)
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorArgos 2013-06-01 08:14
I'd like to ad that I also thought about buying a Intel Core I7 3820.
Would it be wise to switch to the new socket?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorDavid Ramsey 2013-06-01 10:55
You will see a substantial performance improvement moving from a 920 to a Haswell CPU. As I mentioned in the review, if you've upgrading your platform, there's little reason to spend money on the end-of-life LGA1155 platform unless you can find motherboards and CPUs significantly cheaper than Haswell-based components.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorArgos 2013-06-01 11:13
A substantial improvement?
Ok, being a layman that was not quite clear to me.

Is the LGA2011 platform at the end-of-life too?
The i7 3820 is a hundred bucks cheaper than the i74770 and appears to be just as powerful.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorDavid Ramsey 2013-06-01 13:27
Well, I did provide a link to my original Sandy Bridge review, which compared the then-new Core i7-2600K to a Core 2 950. The 2600K stomped all over the 950, so it's a reasonable assumption that the two-generations-newer 4770K would be much faster than a 920.

Yes, a Core i7-3820 will be (for all intents and purposes) about the same performance as a 4770K, except in things that use the integrated GPU like Quick Sync. You would have to buy an expensive LGA2011 motherboard, though. And while the LGA 2011 isn't EOL, it's a more expensive platform overall, and it's not really worth the money unless (A) you really anticipate a need for a six-core CPU in the future, or (B) can really used all those PCI-E lanes. In the meantime you're giving up the advantages of the Haswell platform, like more SATA 6G ports, integrated USB 3.0, and all those fun Intel SSD caching things.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorArgos 2013-06-01 14:53
Mr. Ramsey,
Thank you so much for your time.
You've really helped me to decide.
One can read all the reviews one can digest, but for a layman it is very difficult to get a clear view of these complex technical matters.
I might wait a few more months (if I can muster the patience) and then I will opt for a Haswell based machine with a GTX780.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorDavid Ramsey 2013-06-01 13:29
Also, on Newegg right now a Core i7-3820 is $299.99, while the MSRP of a 4770K is $339.99. That's only $40 difference, and you'll probably spend that much more on an LGA2011 motherboard.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorRob 2013-06-01 10:24
It all depends on what you want to do with your machine and is your machine currently meeting your needs. I was considering going with the Haswell upgrade and the GTX 770 but then looked at my usage to see if my machine was being taxed or missing some feature. My answer was, no I am not missing anything. I have the same CPU as you but have a GPU GTX 570. I also had the GTX 295 and when I upgraded to the GTX 570 there was a huge improvement. I also put in an SSD which helped out a bit as well. You also have to remember most games a console ports as well.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorArgos 2013-06-01 11:21
My system is foremost used as a gaming computer. I am a heavy gamer. I also work with large databases containing tens of thousands of records.

I noticed that my GTX295 has difficulty keeping up with the latest games. And I want my machine to be able to run games like Metro Last Light, and the upcoming Watchdogs, Batman Arkham Origins, and most of all GTA V etc without any problems.
I read somewhere that my current motherboard would limit the newer much faster videocards like the GTX780 in their data throughput. So I figured I needed a new system.
Report Comment
 
 
# GPU.alfie 2013-06-01 11:32
I would upgrade your GPU first, then investigate what level of GPU will saturate PCI-e2 (a single 780 will not, a 690 might a bit), if you're still not happy with the performance you can upgrade the CPU/board and carry the GPU accross to a new board.

Unless you have cash to burn then just buy the best :D

Just my 2cents.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: GPU.Argos 2013-06-01 12:25
Thanks. Something to consider... but my current system is so stable and reliable I hate the thought of breaking it up. I don't want to jinks it :). I think I might keep it intact as a backup system.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorDavid Ramsey 2013-06-01 14:19
Theoretically, yes, the PCI-E 2.0 lanes on older motherboards only offer half the throughput of the PCI-E 3.0 lanes on a newer motherboard.

In terms of game playing, though, no current video card can even come close to saturating the bandwidth of 16 PCI-E 2.0 lanes. So a newer motherboard won't help there.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell Processorcube 2013-06-02 10:09
I have the i920. stock and all i did was add an SSD - and Nvidia 680 GTX - ALL my games run butter smooth still. - i have no problem in the cpu department. still considering the upgrade just cause.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorPico 2013-07-10 03:30
Keep that 920.

I have an i7-2600K that I can push to 4800Ghz.
Can only push the 4770K to 4400Ghz.

But even with both at 4400Ghz, the 2600K is far faster than the 4770K.

I do not play games. I am a developer and I usually compile 24 huge projects at the same time which pushes the CPU to the max.
After I do a 7Zip to all 24 EXEs at the same time again.

The 2600K finishes the same task way faster than the 4770K.

Don't know why but its the disappointed truth.

Have an i7-2600K + Asus P8P67 WS Revolution and now an i7-4770K + ASUS Z87 Deluxe.

Will have to sell this new babies and keep the 2600K.

Hope this helps some of you.

Pico
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorChris 2013-06-01 11:59
To be honest, the CPU performance is where I expected. On average, we're looking at a minor performance gain of perhaps 5% on average. Also, the reason why power consumption went up is because they integrated the voltage regulators onto the chip itself, so power:performance is not going to go up.

What really bugs me about this is that well, Intel has taken VT-d out of the K series of parts. It's a matter of chasing short term profits for long term gains IMO. Actually, if they wanted enthusiasts to buy Xeons, they could try to sell a "K" series of Xeon cpu.

Then you realize that Intel is a monopoly and that well, they can pull this sort of segmentation off because well, there's nothing the competition can do.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell Processorcaring1 2013-06-01 14:34
Except bring out their own performance, unlocked Processor.
Something which AMD has in their plans for future release.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorDavid Ramsey 2013-06-01 17:21
What do you mean? AMD's _current_ CPUs are unlocked.
Report Comment
 
 
# LeeLee 2013-06-02 01:57
Would this be a big upgrade for me as I have a i5750 Lynnfield cpu.

I do a lot of desktop and programs work on three 1200 res monitors and sometimes the computer slows down . even when transferring files from one hard drive to another it can kill the system.

would I benefit upgrading my system would I see a big upgrade at the same clock speed.

thanks for any advice
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: LeeDavid Ramsey 2013-06-02 08:38
My guess would be that the CPU is the least important part of your system as regards performance. After all, transferring files from one disk to another isn't a very CPU-intensive activity, so upgrading to a faster CPU probably wouldn't help.

Without knowing more it's hard to say what the problem is. If you're running an old XP box, it's probably full of crufty software junk. Limited RAM can affect performance as stuff must be continually swapped out to disk, and hard disks themselves could be slow.

For most people, upgrading from a hard disk to an SSD is the single biggest performance improvement they can make. You might want to try this and see if it helps. You can of course always use the SSD if you decide to subsequently upgrade the entire system.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: LeeLee 2013-06-02 10:00
thanks

windows 7 and have two f3 samsungs and 4gig ram that uses 60%

still wanting to upgrade but wanted to know if it was worth it

thanks
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorAki 2013-06-03 04:33
Srory (to set the scene) and then one question I'd like opinions on pls. I also run an i920 and it's currently clocked at 3.8 without breaking a sweat. The only reason I kept it down there is because I don't want my missus complaining about fan noise when she's working on her laptop (and I'm gaming next to her). I was thinking of upgrading my CPU (which would effectively constitute a rebuild with mobo and memory and cpu).

I've had no issues with gaming or working through windows, it was more of an 'upgrade itch'. So in the end I backpedalled out of the rebuild idea. I had been running on my XFX 5870 GPU for the last three and bit years, so opted to put the cash there instead and went for a Vapor-X 7970GhZ. Money well spend imho. I can probably squeeze some more out the i7920 (DO) if I need to, and wait till next year for Broadwell before I rebuild....or at least that's my thinking, and the question is, do people agree with the approach?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorDavid Ramsey 2013-06-03 05:07
The performance of the Haswell at the same clock speed will be substantially better than that of the i920. That said, it's hard to predict how it would affect your frame rates in games. When I compared the 950 to the then-new Sandy Bridge 2600K, overall performance was 35% better on benchmarks, but I didn't do any "game frame rate with discrete video card" tests. The 920 was a great CPU and I think your strategy of going for a video card upgrade was the right one in this case.4jnft
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorRob 2013-06-03 07:58
I agree with your approach with just upgrading the video card and waiting for Broadwell I plan on doing the same.

I am almost in the same position as you(see my comment above).
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell Processorsamiullah shah 2013-06-12 11:16
i want to know that is there any compatibility issue if use core i7 4770k with asus maximus vi extream ??
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Intel Core-i7 4770K Haswell ProcessorDavid Ramsey 2013-06-12 16:41
I would imagine not. It would be quite embarrassing for ASUS if there was.
Report Comment
 
 
# managerdarsikun 2014-01-29 22:14
would I benefit upgrading my system would I see a big upgrade at the same clock speed.

thanks for any advice
Report Comment
 
 
# managerdarsikun 2014-01-29 22:15
I can probably squeeze some more out the i7920 (DO) if I need to, and wait till next year for Broadwell before I rebuild....or at least that's my thinking, and the question is, do people agree with the approach?
Paket Pulau Tidung
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter