Archive Home arrow Reviews: arrow Video Cards arrow NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics Card
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics Card E-mail
Reviews - Featured Reviews: Video Cards
Written by Olin Coles   
Thursday, 23 May 2013
Table of Contents: Page Index
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics Card
First Look: GTX 780
Video Card Testing Methodology
DX10: Crysis Warhead
DX11: 3DMark11
DX11: Aliens vs Predator
DX11: Batman Arkham City
DX11: Battlefield 3
DX11: Lost Planet 2
DX11: Metro 2033
DX11: Unigine Heaven 3.0
Temperature and Power Consumption
GeForce GTX 780 Conclusion

DX11: Batman Arkham City

Batman: Arkham City is a 3d-person action game that adheres to story line previously set forth in Batman: Arkham Asylum, which launched for game consoles and PC back in 2009. Based on an updated Unreal Engine 3 game engine, Batman: Arkham City enjoys DirectX 11 graphics which uses multi-threaded rendering to produce life-like tessellation effects. While gaming console versions of Batman: Arkham City deliver high-definition graphics at either 720p or 1080i, you'll only get the high-quality graphics and special effects on PC.

In an age when developers give game consoles priority over PC, it's becoming difficult to find games that show off the stunning visual effects and lifelike quality possible from modern graphics cards. Fortunately Batman: Arkham City is a game that does amazingly well on both platforms, while at the same time making it possible to cripple the most advanced graphics card on the planet by offering extremely demanding NVIDIA 32x CSAA and full PhysX capability. Also available to PC users (with NVIDIA graphics) is FXAA, a shader based image filter that achieves similar results to MSAA yet requires less memory and processing power.

Batman: Arkham City offers varying levels of PhysX effects, each with its own set of hardware requirements. You can turn PhysX off, or enable 'Normal levels which introduce GPU-accelerated PhysX elements such as Debris Particles, Volumetric Smoke, and Destructible Environments into the game, while the 'High' setting adds real-time cloth and paper simulation. Particles exist everywhere in real life, and this PhysX effect is seen in many aspects of game to add back that same sense of realism. For PC gamers who are enthusiastic about graphics quality, don't skimp on PhysX. DirectX 11 makes it possible to enjoy many of these effects, and PhysX helps bring them to life in the game.

  • Batman: Arkham City
    • Settings: 8x AA, 16x AF, MVSS+HBAO, High Tessellation, Extreme Detail, PhysX Disabled

Batman-Arkham-City-Benchmark.jpg

Batman: Arkham City Benchmark Test Results

Graphics Card Radeon HD6970 GeForce GTX670 Radeon HD7970 GeForce GTX680 GeForce GTX780 GeForce GTX590 Radeon HD6990 GeForce GTX690
GPU Cores 1536 1344 2048 1536 2304 1024 3072 Total 3072
Core Clock (MHz) 880 915 925 1006 863 608 830/880 915
Shader Clock (MHz) N/A 980 Boost N/A Boost 1058 Boost 902 1215 N/A Boost 1020
Memory Clock (MHz) 1375 1502 1375 1502 1502 854 1250 1502
Memory Amount 2048MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 3072MB GDDR5 2048MB GDDR5 3072MB GDDR5 3072 GDDR5 4096MB GDDR5 4096MB GDDR5
Memory Interface 256-bit 256-bit 384-bit 256-bit 384-bit 384-bit 256-bit 256-bit



 

Comments 

 
# Caring1John 2013-05-23 12:18
Pity the bias shown towards Nvidia resulted in the exclusion of the newly released AMD 7990, which I believe would be a true competitor being in the same price bracket.
Try the tests again when you include that card and we'll see how smug Nvidia is then.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Caring1Austin Downing 2013-05-23 12:28
You guys really find a way to say we are biased every time. If we don't have one NVIDIA card in a test then obviously we love AMD, and if we don't have one AMD card obviously we are biased towards NVIDIA.

He is a idea, perhaps we don't have a 7990 because AMD never saw fit to send us one. I am sure if you would like to send Olin a card he would gladly test it.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Caring1Caring1 2013-05-23 19:00
I hardly think the bias shown towards Nvidia in this revue has anything to do with the exclusion of any particular card.
I really don't care one way or another which brand is the better, so i'm definitely not a "fan boy" of either camp.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: Caring1Olin Coles 2013-05-23 22:19
Um, so why do you think there is any bias then? You do realize it's just benchmark results and FPS numbers, right? Kind of hard to bias that.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: Caring1Caring1 2013-05-24 04:38
Yes, the stats don't lie.
I was talking about your conclusion which doesn't even admit the existence of the 7990.
and ranks the GTX 780 against the lesser 7970, which is apples and oranges.
If you were unable to test the 7990, then why not admit it like you did with the Titan which you state was not tested.
For example:
"GeForce GTX 780 lacks direct competition from another graphics card. The closest available competing solution comes in the form of AMD's Radeon HD 7970, which as you might have seen from the benchmark results, hardly compares. In fact, the only real competition that can stand up to GTX 780 is the GeForce GTX TITAN (not tested), and the dual-GPU GTX 690. There were rare occasions when the dual-GPU AMD Radeon HD 6990, such as in Metro 2033 and Aliens vs Predator, but otherwise AMD has nothing to compare against GTX 780 (as well as GTX TITAN, and GTX 690).
Synthetic benchmark tools offer an unbiased read on graphics products, allowing video card manufacturers to display their performance without special game optimizations or driver influence. Futuremark's 3DMark11 benchmark suite strained our high-end graphics cards with only mid-level settings displayed at 720p, yet GeForce GTX 780 produced higher FPS results than every graphics card AMD produces".
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Caring1Austin Downing 2013-05-24 06:24
So, he left out one sentence and therefore he must be biased? Seems like a pretty strawman argument.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Caring1Olin Coles 2013-05-24 07:30
You honestly think the Radeon HD 7990, a dual-GPU $1050 video card, is the direct competition for a $650 single-GPU GeForce GTX 780? Seriously? I can hear AMD calling you back to the first to sing Kumbaya with the rest of the boys.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Caring1Olin Coles 2013-05-24 07:33
PS: GeForce GTX TITAN has one single GPU, so of course I'm going to mention it as competition for the #2 best-performing single GPU video card (GTX 780). Methinks you lack an understanding of these products, and what makes apples and oranges different.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Caring1Olin Coles 2013-05-23 12:32
If you have one to loan for testing, I'll gladly pay for shipping and include it. Otherwise, we have no intention of purchasing a product that we've been intentionally excluded from receiving from manufacturers. AMD wouldn't even give us a media briefing on the product details, which is telling.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: Caring1Caring1 2013-05-23 18:57
Tom's Hardware has a review of the 7990 which compares it a to number of cards, including Nvidia.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Caring1Pigbristle 2013-05-23 12:34
While I do agree with some bias towards nvidia by this reviewer, I have to disagree with your 'same price bracket quote' The 7990 seems to be around 250 more expensive. Therefore not a true competitor.
Report Comment
 
 
# no Titan either. whats your point?sean 2013-05-24 04:47
they didnt include the Titan, either. There is no point in comparing this card to the flagships, from either company.
Report Comment
 
 
# Idiot.Alex 2013-07-04 08:15
Or, since you are clearly an AMD fanboy, you should maybe go look at some 7990 articles, seeing how they are biased aswell. It is just the way it works man. Not only that, but who the # cares. If you like AMD, go buy AMD, if you like Nvidia guess what? GO BUY NVIDIA. The truth is, both manufacturers have ups and downs. AMD can't Crossfire for # right now, so for anybody who is interested in bridging, AMD is 100% useless. Nvidia has horrible game packages right now, so for anybody who is poor and can't afford games, Nvidia is 100% useless to you. There is going to be company bias anywhere you go, this community is full of fanboys and illogical morons. Do yourself a favor and find yourself a AMD review if that is what you are looking for.
Report Comment
 
 
# Really ? at 1920nyein 2013-05-24 00:11
benching those GTX780 high end card on 1920x1080 is ridiculous.
the person who buy GTX780 will not be playing on Full HD.
They want on 2560 or surround.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: Really ? at 1920Luay 2013-05-27 01:45
Unless it's a 120hz++ display.
Report Comment
 
 
# Really ?Alex 2013-07-04 08:23
I own a 780, and quite often I disable Nvidia surround and play 1920x1080. I enjoy multitasking sometimes, and to be quite honest Nvidia surround is not that special. Unless you like dealing with stretch marks and fish-eye effect. From what I have seen it is a massive pain in the arsenal for me to have to adjust resolution of games. Even with Widescreen Fixer, the games look horrible and are still stretched beyond my enjoyment. Maybe me buying the 780 was a mistake. Or maybe when Next-Gen games come out. I might actually be able to play them at 1920x1080. Because truth be told, your 560ti or whatever you think is fine for 1920x1080, Is going to be garbage for games like BF4 or higher.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics CardChris 2013-05-24 06:40
It seems that we're looking at 20% faster (or thereabouts) than a 680 GTX depending on which game you look at.

From a performance standpoint, it's a modest upgrade over the 680/7970 and well, in terms of price to performance, not really an upgrade at all. You can get a 7970 these days for under $400 US/CAD, so a card that performs 20% faster is a pretty hard sell. Of course, as you get into the higher end, the law of diminishing returns comes into play.

It's basically a cut down Titan, brought to an "affordable" price point for the general public.

What this card needs is something like an MSI GTX 780 Lightning, namely something with better cooling and a better PCB. On that note, Olin is there any word that something like that will happen?
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics CardOlin Coles 2013-05-24 07:36
MSI hinted on a production product arriving in June. No word on pricing, however.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics CardChris 2013-05-24 09:08
I'm expecting a ~$100 premium over the reference, which hopefully will be cheaper. Let's face it though, for those that wanted price:performance, this card is not going to be it.

But the real reason why I like the MSI series of cards Lightning/Hawk/PE, is due to the cooler and better PCB. They usually do tend to overclock better as well, although OC is always no assurance.

It seems right now, for $350 less than the Titan, you lose ~10% of core performance, 3gb of VRAM (no big deal unless you're playing a super high resolutions), and that's about it. But the Titan was always a hard sell to the general public.

This card, to be honest, is not a great value either. 20% faster, but for about 60% more than the 7970 - it's diminishing returns for sure. I guess I'm a bit disappointed that it's been about 18 months since the 7970 has come out and there haven't been the performance gains at a competitive price point that I would have liked to see.
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: RE: RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics CardAlex 2013-07-04 08:27
You are saying the gtx 780 is bad for price to performance? How about comparing it to the titan. With a MILD overclock, the 780 beats a stock titan. So for $300 less, you basically get same performace as a titan, same look, same cooling. It is good value for money if you were previously in the market for a Titan (which if anybody still buys a titan, they are completely stupid.)
Report Comment
 
 
# Is the GTX 780 Waterproof ???...Tangldweb 2013-05-24 08:23
I ask because I figure this would be the BEST Overall card for these AMD people whom Cry everytime their poor cards get the C@%& kicked out of them as with the 650ti Boost. I mean my 650ti boost couldnt take this kind of Humidity on a Good Day so I'm figuring the AMD cards MUST be waterproof. So I must agree that not using the AMD'S obviously waterproof cards such as the 7990 in this reveiw is Highly Biased,.. even though I Rarely use my Desktop in the Pool !!! There's always one in the Crowd. Hehe. And I'd link other reveiws that back up these numbers but needless to say,.. Good Technical Reveiw as always. Cheers
Report Comment
 
 
# RE: NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Graphics CardTrajan Long 2013-05-25 05:44
I can't believe that AMD fanbois are whining about the 7990, a Crossfire solution which doesn't get almost half its fps numbers to the screen due to runt frames, resulting in herky jerky stuttering. Many sites have exposed this and currently refuse to recommend Crossfire until this is fixed, including Hardocp, Tech Report, Hardware Canucks, PC Perspective.
Report Comment
 

Comments have been disabled by the administrator.

Search Benchmark Reviews
QNAP Network Storage Servers

Follow Benchmark Reviews on FacebookReceive Tweets from Benchmark Reviews on Twitter